留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

成形极限预测韧性断裂准则及屈服准则的影响

陈劼实 周贤宾

陈劼实, 周贤宾. 成形极限预测韧性断裂准则及屈服准则的影响[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 32(08): 969-973.
引用本文: 陈劼实, 周贤宾. 成形极限预测韧性断裂准则及屈服准则的影响[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 32(08): 969-973.
Chen Jieshi, Zhou Xianbin. Suitability of some ductile fracture criteria and yield criteria in forming limit prediction[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 32(08): 969-973. (in Chinese)
Citation: Chen Jieshi, Zhou Xianbin. Suitability of some ductile fracture criteria and yield criteria in forming limit prediction[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 32(08): 969-973. (in Chinese)

成形极限预测韧性断裂准则及屈服准则的影响

基金项目: 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20040006022)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈劼实(1979-),女,辽宁锦州人,博士生, chenjieshi@yahoo.com.cn.

  • 中图分类号: TG 381

Suitability of some ductile fracture criteria and yield criteria in forming limit prediction

  • 摘要: 将韧性断裂准则用于预测板材成形极限,通过数值模拟HS钢、IF钢和6111-T4铝合金3种板材在单向拉伸、平面应变和双向等拉等不同应变路径下的变形过程,获得试件中心区域主应变最大单元的应变历史,结合成形极限实验数据计算韧性断裂准则的材料常数;通过对接近平面应变变形路径下的模拟结果与实验获得的网格应变相比较分析了Hill48,Hill90和Barlat89 3种各向异性屈服准则对模拟获得的应变路径的影响.结果表明,Barlat89屈服准则可以较好地描述单元的应变路径;在此基础上比较了几种韧性断裂准则用于预测板材断裂成形极限的计算结果, Cockcroft-Latham准则和总塑性功准则的计算结果比较理想,材料常数的确定也较为简单.

     

  • [1] 陈劼实,周贤宾. 板料成形极限的理论预测与数值模拟研究[J].塑性工程学报,2004,11(1):13-17 Chen Jieshi, Zhou Xianbin. The theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of sheet metal forming limit[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2004,11(1):13-17(in Chinese) [2] Goijaerts A M, Govaert L E. Evaluation of ductile fracture model for different metals in blanking[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2001,110:312-323 [3] Li X Q, Zhou X B, Wu X D, et al. Suitability of the yield criterion in numerical simulation of stretch bending of Aluminum extrusions Smith L M, Pourboghrat F. NUMISHEET'2005, 6th International Conference:Numerical Simulation of 3-D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Detroit, US:, 2005:359-364 [4] Yao Hong, Cao Jian. Prediction of forming limit curves using an anisotropic yield function with prestrain induced backstress[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2002,18:1013-1038 [5] Graf A F, Hosford W F. Calculations of forming limit diagrams for changing strain paths[J]. Metals Transaction A, 1993,24:2497-2501 [6] Lee J K, Kinzel G L, Wagoner R H. NUMISHEET'96, 3rd International Conference:Numerical Simulation of 3-D Sheet Metal Forming Processes——Forming Limit Diagram Benchmark . Dearborn, Michigan:, 1996:476-518, 834-840 [7] Cockcroft M G, Latham D J. Ductility and the workability of metals[J]. Journal of the Institute of Metals, 1968,96:33-39 [8] Clift S E, Hartley P. Fracture prediction in plastic deformation processes[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Science,1990,32:1-17 [9] Oyane M, Sato T. Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications . Journal of Mechanical Working and Technology, 1980,4:65-81
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4011
  • HTML全文浏览量:  79
  • PDF下载量:  1568
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-09-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2006-08-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答