飞翼布局飞行器等离子体激励滚转操控试验

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0309

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 701-708.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0309

飞翼布局飞行器等离子体激励滚转操控试验

姚军锴¹, 何海波¹, 周丹杰¹, 何承军¹, 史志伟², 杜海²

1. 北京机电工程研究所, 北京 100074;
2. 南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2016-04-18 出版日期:2017-04-20 发布日期:2016-09-12
通讯作者: 姚军锴,E-mail:yjk1031@163.com E-mail:yjk1031@163.com
作者简介:姚军锴男,硕士研究生,工程师。主要研究方向:飞行器气动布局设计。

Tests of flying wing aircraft roll control using plasma actuator

YAO Junkai¹, HE Haibo¹, ZHOU Danjie¹, HE Chengjun¹, SHI Zhiwei², DU Hai²

1. Beijing Electro-mechanical Engineering Institute, Beijing 100074, China;
2. College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2016-04-18 Online:2017-04-20 Published:2016-09-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 飞翼布局飞行器采用多个气动舵面共同作用来控制飞行，常规气动舵面的结构复杂，在大迎角时由于流动分离，舵面操纵效率显著降低。等离子体激励器具有结构简单、重量轻和响应快等优势，常被用在流动控制上。本文利用激励器抑制单侧翼面流动分离产生不对称的气动力，对飞翼布局飞行器滚转通道的控制进行了试验研究，得出了激励器在飞行器上的最优布置位置和最佳控制参数，并和常规副翼舵面滚转操控效果进行了对比。结果表明：布置于内翼、中翼前缘的等离子体激励器能够获得最佳的滚转控制效果；激励器调制频率对飞行器滚转控制效果的影响较大，而激励电压对滚转控制效果的影响较小；与常规副翼相比，等离子体激励器在大迎角时对滚转通道的操控效果优于副翼。

关键词: 等离子体激励器, 飞翼布局, 风洞试验, 滚转操控, 流动控制

Abstract: Flying wing aircraft usually uses multiple aerodynamic control surfaces for flight control. The aerodynamic control surface has a complex structure and control efficiency decreases dramatically at large angles of attack due to flow separation. The plasma actuator is usually used in flow control due to the advantages of simple structure, light-weight design and fast time response. In this paper, tests were done using the plasma actuator to produce asymmetrical aerodynamic forces for flying wing aircraft roll control by suppressing the flow separation on unilateral wing. The optimal dispose position and discharge parameter of plasma actuator were obtained and aileron roll control effect was also investigated and compared with plasma actuator. The results indicate that the plasma actuator arranged at the leading edge of inner and middle wing can get the best roll control effect. The modulation frequency of plasma actuator has significant impact on aircraft roll control, while excitation voltage's impact is small. Compared to the aileron, the plasma actuator achieves better roll control effect at large angles of attack.

Key words: plasma actuator, flying wing, wind tunnel test, roll control, flow control

中图分类号:

V211.7

姚军锴, 何海波, 周丹杰, 何承军, 史志伟, 杜海. 飞翼布局飞行器等离子体激励滚转操控试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(4): 701-708.

YAO Junkai, HE Haibo, ZHOU Danjie, HE Chengjun, SHI Zhiwei, DU Hai. Tests of flying wing aircraft roll control using plasma actuator[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2017, 43(4): 701-708.

参考文献

[1] BOWLUS J A,MULTHOPP D,BANDA S S.Challenges and opportunities in tailless aircraft stability and control:AIAA-97-3830[R].Reston:AIAA,1997:1713-1718.
[2] 李林,马超,王立新.小展弦比飞翼布局飞机稳定特性[J].航空学报,2007,28(6):1312-1317.LI L,MA C,WANG L X.Stability features of low aspect-ratio flying wings[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007,28(6):1312-1317(in Chinese).
[3] MOELLER E B,REDINIOTIS O K.Hingeless flow control over a Delta-wing planform[J].Journal of Aircraft,2002,39(6):1035-1044.
[4] TRAUB L W,GILARRANZ J L,REDINIOTIS O K.Delta wing hingeless control via synthetic jet actuation[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.Reston:AIAA,2002:1-10.
[5] 孔轶男,黄建栋,王立新,等.涡流控制在小展弦比飞翼布局飞机上的应用研究[J].空气动力学学报,2008,26(4):435-439.KONG Y N,HUANG J D,WANG L X,et al.Vortex control in low aspect ratio flying wing[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2008,26(4):435-439(in Chinese).
[6] CORKE T C,POST M L.Overview of plasma actuators:Concepts,optimization,and applications:AIAA-2005-563[R].Reston:AIAA,2005.
[7] CORKE T C,ENLOE C L,WILKINSON S P.Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control[J].Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics,2010,42:505-529.
[8] ROUPASSOV D V,ZAVYALOV I N,STARIKOVSKⅡ A Y,et al.Boundary layer separation plasma control using low-temperature non-equilibrium plasma of gas discharge[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.Reston:AIAA,2006:1-7.
[9] POST M L,CORKE T C.Separation control on high angle of attack airfoil using plasma actuators[J].AIAA Journal,2004,42(11):2177-2184.
[10] PATEL M P,NG T T,VASUDEVAN S,et al.Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle[J].Journal of Aircraft,2007,44(4):1264-1273.
[11] HE C,CORKE T C,PATEL M P.Plasma flaps and slats:An application of weakly ionized plasma actuators[J].Journal of Aircraft,2009,46(3):864-873.
[12] NELSON R C,CORKE T C,HE C A,et al.Modification of the flow structure over a UAV wing for roll control:AIAA-2007-884[R].Reston:AIAA,2007.
[13] 杜海,史志伟,倪芳原,等.基于等离子体激励的飞翼布局飞行器气动力矩控制[J].航空学报,2013,34(9):2038-2046.DU H,SHI Z W,NI F Y,et al.Aerodynamic moment control of flying wing vehicle using plasma actuators[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2013,34(9):2038-2046(in Chinese).
[14] 杜海,史志伟,耿玺,等.等离子体激励器对微型飞行器横航向气动力矩控制的实验研究[J].航空学报,2012,33(10):1781-1790.DU H,SHI Z W,GENG X,et al.Experimental study of directional-lateral aerodynamic moment control of micro air vehicle by plasma actuators[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2012,33(10):1781-1790(in Chinese).
[15] 王万波,章荣平,黄宗波,等.等离子体激励用于2段翼型增升的试验研究[J].空气动力学学报,2012,30(1):64-68.WANG W B,ZHANG R P,HUANG Z B,et al.Test research of two-element airfoil lift enhancement by plasma actuator[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2012,30(1):64-68(in Chinese).
[16] 李应红,吴云,张朴.等离子体激励抑制翼型失速分离的实验研究[J].空气动力学学报,2008,26(3):372-377.LI Y H,WU Y,ZHANG P.Experimental investigation on airfoil stall separation suppression by plasma actuation[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2008,26(3):372-377(in Chinese).
[17] 王万波,黄勇,黄宗波,等.介质阻挡放电等离子体对NACA0015翼型流动控制的PIV实验研究[J].实验流体力学,2012,26(2):1-5.WANG W B,HUANG Y,HUANG Z B,et al.PIV measurement of dielectric barrier discharge plasma flow control on NACA0015 airfoil[J].Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2012,26(2):1-5(in Chinese).
[18] 李应红,梁华,马清源,等.脉冲等离子体气动激励抑制翼型吸力面流动分离的实验[J].航空学报,2008,29(6):1429-1435.LI Y H,LIANG H,MA Q Y,et al.Experimental investigation on airfoil suction side flow separation by pulse plasma aerodynamic actuation[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2008,29(6):1429-1435(in Chinese).
[19] 赵勤,吴云,李应红,等.端壁等离子体气动激励抑制高负荷压气机叶栅角区流动分离实验[J].航空动力学报,2013,28(9):2129-2138.ZHAO Q,WU Y,LI Y H,et al.Experiment of flow separation control in highly loaded compressor cascade corner by endwall plasma aerodynamic actuation[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2013,28(9):2129-2138(in Chinese).

飞翼布局飞行器等离子体激励滚转操控试验

Tests of flying wing aircraft roll control using plasma actuator

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杜思亮, 唐正飞, 赵文静, 陈荟, 王英宇. 纵列式双扇翼气动特性数值模拟与试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(6): 1164-1175.
[2]	陈功, 杨坤, 王利平, 孔维梁, 王福新. 基于冷库环境下的涡扇发动机叶片冰脱落试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(10): 2106-2114.
[3]	杜思亮, 吉孟江, 唐正飞, 陈仁良. 基于横流风扇技术的直升机反扭验证[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(5): 981-991.
[4]	靳一超, 阎超, 林博希. 射流对高超声速进气道起动性能的影响[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(11): 2302-2309.
[5]	杨俊斌, 吴志刚, 戴玉婷, 马成骥, 杨超. 飞翼布局飞机阵风减缓主动控制风洞试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(1): 184-192.
[6]	秦航远, 吴志刚, 杨超, 戴玉婷, 马成骥. 滚转机动载荷减缓风洞试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(9): 2008-2016.
[7]	唐波, 吴志刚, 杨超, 马成骥. 特种风洞试验中气动伺服弹性失稳故障分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(5): 999-1007.
[8]	邓帆, 焦子涵, 付秋军, 陈林, 田书玲, 张栋. 面向总体性能的高速飞行器布局优化[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(12): 2587-2595.
[9]	郁新华, 陶于金, 张琳, 高丽敏. 飞翼布局无人机进排气影响及机理分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(5): 786-792.
[10]	张孝石, 王聪, 曹伟, 赵成功. 基于流动控制的水下航行体流体动力特性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(4): 656-662.
[11]	李忠剑, 马东立. 飞翼布局阻力类偏航操纵装置操纵特性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(5): 695-700.
[12]	丛成华, 廖达雄. 阻尼网特性数值模拟[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(12): 1691-1696.
[13]	王裕夫, 刘振国, 陶国权. 某高空螺旋桨气动特性数值模拟与风洞试验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(8): 1102-1105.
[14]	陈占军, 巴玉龙, 王晋军. 合成射流控制鼓包分离流动的数值模拟[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, (7): 886-890.
[15]	刘贺, 董金钟, 伍耐明. 大功率狭缝式活塞激励器流场测量与分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, (2): 195-201.