-
摘要:
鉴于定位站位置误差会极大地降低多站无源定位的目标定位精度,提出了一种标校源辅助的不相交多目标到达时差(TDOA)闭式定位算法。该算法首先使用标校源减小定位站位置误差,并估计对应的误差统计特性,然后使用更新的定位站位置,利用两步加权最小二乘(TS-WLS)算法实现不相交多目标的高精度TDOA定位。通过克拉美罗界(CRLB)推导,从理论上分析了该闭式定位算法的定位性能;通过仿真实验,验证了标校源校正技术可提高对多目标的定位精度,并且在较小的TDOA观测误差和定位站位置误差下,对多目标的定位性能可以达到CRLB。该算法不需要初始值估计和迭代运算,同时避免了定位站和目标位置的联合估计,计算量较小。
-
关键词:
- 标校源 /
- 不相交多目标 /
- 到达时差(TDOA) /
- 定位精度 /
- 克拉美罗界(CRLB)
Abstract:The passive source localization accuracy can be greatly reduced due to the sensor position error. A localization algorithm using time difference of arrival (TDOA) for multiple disjoint sources was proposed, which improves the localization accuracy by means of a single calibration emitter. The sensor position error was first reduced by using the calibration emitter, and the corresponding error statistical knowledge was estimated. Then based on the updated sensor position, TDOA localization of multiple disjoint sources with high accuracy was realized by utilizing the algorithm of two-step weighted least squares (TS-WLS). The Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) was theoretically derived to analyze the localization performance of the closed-form algorithm. And the theoretical derivation was validated by the simulations. The simulation results indicate that the localization accuracy of multiple disjoint sources is obviously improved by using calibration correction technique. Moreover, the solution performance is shown to reach the CRLB under small TDOA observation error and sensor position error. The developed estimator is computationally attractive because it does not require initial solution estimation and iterative computation. Furthermore, joint estimation between source positions and sensor positions is not needed, which reduces the calculation amount.
-
表 1 定位站位置坐标
Table 1. Position coordinates of sensors
m 定位站 位置坐标 x y z s1 300 100 150 s2 400 150 100 s3 300 500 200 s4 350 200 100 s5 -100 -100 -100 s6 200 -300 -200 -
[1] YANG H, CHUN J.An improved algebraic solution for moving target localization in non-coherent MIMO radar systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, 64(1):258-270. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2477803 [2] LI Y R, HO K C.Efficient closed-form estimators for multi-static sonar localization[J].IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2015, 51(1):600-614. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2014.140482 [3] SHI J, FAN L, ZHANG X L, et al.Multi-target positioning for passive sensor network via bistatic range space projection[J].Science China Information Science Letter, 2016, 59:019302:1-019302:3. [4] LIU C, FANG D Y, JIANG H B, et al.RSS distribution-based passive localization and its application in sensor networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2016, 15(4):2883-2895. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2015.2512861 [5] WANG Y, HO K C.TDOA positioning irrespective of source range[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2017, 65(6):1447-1460. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2630030 [6] NGUYEN N H, DOGANCAY K.Single-platform passive emitter localization with bearing and Doppler-shift measurements using pseudolinear estimation techniques[J].Signal Processing, 2016, 125:336-348. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.01.023 [7] YIN F, ZHAO Y X, FREDRIK G, et al.Received-signal-strength threshold optimization using Gaussian processes[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2017, 65(8):2164-2177. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2017.2655480 [8] NGUYEN N H, DOGANCAY K.Multistatic pseudolinear target motion analysis using hybrid measurements[J].Signal Processing, 2017, 130:22-36. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.06.004 [9] FOY W H.Position-location solution by Taylor-series estimation[J].IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1976, 12(2):187-194. [10] TORRIERI D J.Statistical theory of passive location systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1984, 20(2):183-198. [11] SMITH J O, ABEL J S.Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range-difference measurements[J].IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1987, 35(12):1661-1669. doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165089 [12] SCHAU H C, ROBINSON A Z.Passive source localization employing intersecting spherical surfaces from time-of-arrival differences[J].IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1987, 35(8):1223-1225. http://eprint.iitd.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2074/1584/1/reddynot1986.pdf [13] CHAN Y T, HO K C.A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1994, 42(8):1905-1915. doi: 10.1109/78.301830 [14] EINEMO M, SO H C.Weighted least squares algorithm for target localization in distributed MIMO radar[J].Signal Processing, 2015, 115:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.04.004 [15] YANG H, CHUN J, CHASE D.Hyperbolic localization in MIMO radar system[J].IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letter, 2015, 14:618-621. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2374603 [16] REZA M V, MICHAEL R B. On the CRLB of TDOA-FDOA estimation from MIMO signals[C]//IEEE/ION Postion, Location & Navigation Symposium-plans. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2016: 772-778. [17] HO K C, KOVAVISARUCH L, PARIKH H. Source localization using TDOA with erroneous receiver positions[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2004: 453-456. [18] HO K C, LU X N, KOVAVISARUCH L, et al.Source localization using TDOA and FDOA measurements in the presence of receiver location errors:Analysis and solution[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, 55(2):684-696. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2006.885744 [19] HO K C, YANG L.On the use of a calibration emitter for source localization in the presence of sensor position uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(12):5758-5772. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2008.929870 [20] YANG L, HO K C.An approximately efficient TDOA localization algorithm in closed-form for locating multiple disjoint sources with erroneous sensor positions[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2009, 57(1):4598-4615. [21] SUN M, HO K C.An asymptotically efficient estimator for TDOA and FDOA positioning of multiple disjoint sources in the presence of sensor location uncertainties[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(7):3434-3440. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2131135