空中加油软管“甩鞭”现象安全性分析与仿真验证

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0607

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 1958-1965.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0607

空中加油软管“甩鞭”现象安全性分析与仿真验证

丛继平¹, 崔利杰², 陈浩然¹, 任博²

1. 空军工程大学研究生院, 西安 710051;
2. 空军工程大学装备管理与无人机工程学院, 西安 710051

收稿日期:2019-11-27 发布日期:2020-10-29
通讯作者: 崔利杰 E-mail:lijie_cui@163.com
作者简介:丛继平男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:装备系统工程与管理决策;崔利杰男,博士,教授,硕士生导师。主要研究方向:航空安全、系统可靠性与优化;陈浩然男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:装备系统工程与管理决策;任博男,博士,讲师。主要研究方向:航空安全预测预警。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71401174）

Safety analysis and simulation verification of HWP in aerial refueling

CONG Jiping¹, CUI Lijie², CHEN Haoran¹, REN Bo²

1. Graduate College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China;
2. Equipment Management and UAV Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China

Received:2019-11-27 Published:2020-10-29
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71401174)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对于软管式空中加油系统，由于受到加油机尾流、大气紊流、受油机艏波、飞行员操作水平、燃油压力脉动等各种因素干扰，加油软管难以稳定在平衡位置，在对接时常发生软管“甩鞭”现象（HWP）。软管“甩鞭”现象严重影响了空中加油任务的安全性，降低对接成功率，是空中加油过程的一种典型危险。基于系统理论事故模型和过程模型（STAMP）理论和系统理论过程分析（STPA）方法对空中加油过程的典型危险——HWP，开展了具体的致因分析，从控制模型的角度系统分析导致HWP发生的不安全行为和相应的致因场景，从系统层、不安全控制行为层和致因因素层分别提出避免空中加油软管HWP发生的一系列安全约束。根据软管HWP的危险功能控制结构，利用Simulink工具搭建仿真验证平台，以对接速度、卷盘机构控制、软管长度关键致因为模型输入，验证所提安全约束的准确性和可行性。

关键词: 空中加油, 软管"甩鞭"现象(HWP), 航空安全, 系统理论事故模型和过程模型(STAMP)理论, 仿真验证

Abstract: For the hose aerial refueling system, the refueling hose is difficult to stabilize in a balance position due to interference of tanker wake, atmospheric turbulence, receiver bow wave, pilot operation, fuel pressure pulsation, etc. Thus the Hose Whipping Phenomenon (HWP) usually takes place in the docking phase of aerial refueling, which could reduce the docking success rate and the safety of refueling, and it is a typical hazard in aerial refueling process. Based on the System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and the System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) method, the safety analysis of HWP in aerial refueling process was carried out to systematically identify the unsafe action and causal scenes by constructing the control model, and a series of operational constraints were proposed from system level, unsafe action level and causing factors. According to the hazard function control structure of the HWP, the simulation verification platform was built by Simulink. The key causes of docking speed, reel mechanism control, and hose design length were inputted to verify the accuracy and feasibility of the proposed safety constraints.

Key words: aerial refueling, Hose Whipping Phenomenon (HWP), aviation safety, System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) theory, simulation verification

中图分类号:

V249

丛继平, 崔利杰, 陈浩然, 任博. 空中加油软管“甩鞭”现象安全性分析与仿真验证[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(10): 1958-1965.

CONG Jiping, CUI Lijie, CHEN Haoran, REN Bo. Safety analysis and simulation verification of HWP in aerial refueling[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(10): 1958-1965.

参考文献

[1] MAIERSPERGER W P.General design aspects of flight refueling[J].Aeronautical Engineering Review,1954,13(3):52-61.
[2] AHMAD M,PONTIGGIA M.Modified Swiss cheese model to analyse the accidents[J].Chemical Engineering Transactions,2015,43:1237-1242.
[3] 黄海燕,李健,江田汉,等.基于贝叶斯网络的事故多级多米诺效应计算方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(6):157-161.HUANG H Y,LI J,JIANG T H,et al.Study on calculation method of multi-level domino effect of accident based on Bayesian network[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(6):157-161(in Chinese).
[4] WATERSON P,JENKINS D P,SALMON P M,et al.Remixing Rasmussen:The evolution of Accimaps within systemic accident analysis[J].Applied Ergonomics,2016,59(B):483-503.
[5] QIAO W G,LI X C,LIU Q L.Systemic approaches to incident analysis in coal mines:Comparison of the STAMP,FRAM and "2-4" models[J].Resources Policy,2019,63:101453.
[6] LEVESON N G.A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J].Safety Science,2004,42(4):237-270.
[7] JING L L,BAI Q G,GUO W Q,et al.Contributory factors interactions model:A new systems-based accident model[J].Systems Research and Behavioral Science,2019,37(11):255-276.
[8] 刘朝晖,陈智,吴志强,等.STPA方法在数字化反应堆紧急停堆系统安全性分析中的研究与应用[J].核动力工程,2015,36(S2):157-161.LIU Z H,CHEN Z,WU Z Q,et al.Research and application of STPA to digital reactor shutdown system in NPP for system safety analysis[J].Nuclear Power Engineering,2015,36(S2):157-161(in Chinese).
[9] PLIOUTSIAS A,KARANIKAS N.Using STPA in the evaluation of fighter pilots training programs[J].Procedia Engineering,2015,128:25-34.
[10] CHATZIMICHAILIDOU M M,WARD J,HORBERRY T,et al.A comparison of the bow-tie and STAMP approaches to reduce the risk of surgical instrument retention[J].Risk Analysis,2017,38:978-990.
[11] 徐坚,张晓非.软式空中加油头波效应建模与仿真[J].飞行力学,2019,37(5):40-44.XU J,ZHANG X F.Dynamic modeling and simulation of bow wave effect in hose-drogue aerial refueling system[J].Flight Dynamics,2019,37(5):40-44(in Chinese).
[12] 王海涛,董新民,郭军,等.空中加油软管锥套组合体甩鞭现象动力学建模与分析[J].航空学报,2015,36(9):3116-3127. WANG H T,DONG X M,GUO J,et al.Dynamics modeling and analysis of hose whipping phenomenon of aerial refueling hose-drogue assembly[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2015,36(9):3116-3127(in Chinese).
[13] HE Q S,WANG H T,CHEN Y F.Command filtered backstepping sliding mode control for the hose whipping phenomenon in aerial refueling[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2017,67:495-505.
[14] COOPER J R,ROTHHAAR P M.Dynamics and control of in-flight wing tip docking[J].Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,2018,41(11):2327-2337.
[15] BURNS R S,CLARK C S,EWART R.The automated aerial refueling simulation at the AVTAS laboratory:AIAA-2005-6008[R].Reston:AIAA,2005.

空中加油软管“甩鞭”现象安全性分析与仿真验证

Safety analysis and simulation verification of HWP in aerial refueling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈浩然, 崔利杰, 任博, 张贾奎. 不确定条件下航空不安全事件灵敏度分析的Monte-Carlo方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(2): 414-421.
[2]	任博, 曾航, 刘敏, 王芳, 崔利杰, 陈浩然. 考虑误差不确定性的航空安全预测新方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(10): 1916-1922.
[3]	王海涛, 董新民, 窦和锋, 薛建平. 软管锥套式空中加油系统建模与特性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(1): 92-98.
[4]	段海滨, 张奇夫, 范彦铭, 李昊. 基于计算机视觉的UAV自主空中加油半物理仿真[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(11): 1491-1496.
[5]	盖文东, 王宏伦, 李大伟. 基于自适应动态逆的自动空中加油轨迹跟踪[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(5): 585-590.
[6]	王宏伦, 杜熠, 盖文东. 无人机自动空中加油精确对接控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 37(7): 822-826.
[7]	解洪文, 王宏伦. 基于双目视觉的自动空中加油近距导航方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 37(2): 206-209.
[8]	祁明亮, 邵雪焱, 池宏. QAR超限事件飞行操作风险诊断方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 37(10): 1207-1210.
[9]	李大伟, 王宏伦. 自动空中加油阶段加油机尾涡流场建模与仿真[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2010, 36(7): 776-780.