基于机场探鸟雷达数据的鸟击风险评估

陈唯实; 万健; 李敬

基于机场探鸟雷达数据的鸟击风险评估

中国民航科学技术研究院, 北京 100028

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金委员会-中国民航局民航联合研究基金资助项目（61079019）；民航科研项目（MHRDZ201125）

详细信息

中图分类号: TN957.52
计量
- 文章访问数: 1417
- HTML全文浏览量: 85
- PDF下载量: 677
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-01-11
- 网络出版日期: 2013-11-30

Bird strike risk assessment with airport avian radar data

China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology, Beijing 100028, China

摘要

摘要: 提出一种实时鸟击风险评估方法.该方法利用机场探鸟雷达获取的实时鸟情信息，通过估计鸟击概率和严重程度实时评估鸟击风险.以飞鸟和跑道位置为自变量建立预估方程，计算鸟击概率.将德尔菲法和层次分析法（AHP，Analytic Hierarchy Process）相结合，建立鸟击严重程度估计模型；该模型充分利用了专家知识和定量计算的优点，称为DAHP模型.为减少该模型中同一层次上参数的个数，将影响评估结果的因素置于一个双层模型中，避免由于同一层次上参数过多造成比较矩阵不满足一致性的问题.本评估方法经过了三跑道的北京首都国际机场仿真数据和单跑道的北海福城机场实测数据的测试.
- 鸟击风险 /
- 评估 /
- 概率 /
- 德尔菲法 /
- 层次分析法
Abstract: A method that uses the real-time bird information collected by the airport-based avian radar system to assess the bird strike risk with the estimation of bird strike probability and severity was proposed. The strike probability was calculated by the prediction equation with the independent variables of the relative positions of the bird and the runway. The strike severity was estimated by the combination of the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), called DAHP, which take full advantage of the expert knowledge and quantitative calculation. To reduce the number of parameters on the same level of the DAHP model, the influencing factors of the evaluation results were arranged in a two-level model, which could avoid the problem of inconsistency of the comparison matrix due to the high number of parameters on the same level. The assessment method was tested on the simulated data at Beijing capital international airport with three runways and the real data at Beihai Fucheng airport with one runway.
- bird strike risk /
- assessment /
- probability /
- Delphi method /
- analytic hierarchy process

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	Anderson R.Avian radar systems.Panama City, Florida:, 2007.http://www.detect-inc.com/downloads
[2]	Allan J.A heuristic risk evaluation technique for bird strike management at airports[J].Risk Analysis, 2006, 26 (3):723-729
[3]	Anagnostopoulos A.Bird strike risk evaluation for athens international airport[C]// 26th Int Bird Strike Committee Conf.Warsaw:IBSC Press, 2003:1-17
[4]	Shaw P, McKee J.Risk evaluation:quantifying aircraft and bird susceptibility to strike[C]// 28th Int Bird Strike Committee Conf.Brasilia:IBSC Press, 2008:1-8
[5]	王志高, 周放, 李相林, 等.机场鸟撞防制中的鸟类风险评价[J].生态科学, 2007, 26 (l):69-74 Wang Zhigao, Zhou Fang, Li Xianglin, et al.Bird risk assessment for bird strike prevention and control at airports[J].Ecologic Science, 2007, 26 (l):69-74 (in Chinese)
[6]	Ruhe W.Bird avoidance models vs.real time bird-strike warning systems-acomparison[C]// 27th Int Bird Strike Committee Conf.Athens:IBSC Press, 2005:1-5
[7]	张锦, 宁焕生, 刘佳, 等.中国民用机场鸟情与鸟击风险[J].中国民用航空, 2008, 86:73-76 Zhang Jin, Ning Huansheng, Liu Jia, et al.Bird situations and bird strike risks in chinese civil airports[J].China Civil Aviation, 2008, 86:73-76 (in Chinese)
[8]	Ning H S, Chen W S, Mao X, et al.Bird-aircraft strike avoidance radar[J].IEEE Aerospace and Electronic System Magazine, 2010, 25 (1):19-28
[9]	Nohara T J, Weber P, Unkrainec A, et al.An overview of avian radar developments-past, present and future[C]// Bird Strike North American Conference.Kingston:Bird Strike Committee Canada Press, 2007:1-8
[10]	陈唯实, 宁焕生, 李敬, 等.基于两种扫描方式的雷达探鸟系统[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2009, 35 (3):380-383 Chen Weishi, Ning Huansheng, Li Jing, et al.Avian radar system based on two scanning modes[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009, 35 (3):380-383 (in Chinese)
[11]	Linstone H A, Turoff M.The Delphi method:techniques and applications[M].Boston:Addison-Wesley, 1975:1-10
[12]	Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:McGraw-Hill, 1980:1-5