2024-T3航空铝合金板材电磁V形弯曲应变分析

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0075

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 158-164.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0075

2024-T3航空铝合金板材电磁V形弯曲应变分析

熊威人, 王文平, 万敏, 李新军

北京航空航天大学机械工程与自动化学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2015-02-04 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-28
通讯作者: 万敏,Tel.:010-82338788E-mail:mwan@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:mwan@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:熊威人男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:基于电磁成形技术的航空板材成形方法。Tel.:010-82338613E-mail:wudiguixu@163.com;万敏男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:新材料成形理论与技术、先进成形工艺与装备技术、飞机数字化制造技术与系统。Tel.:010-82338788E-mail:mwan@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家"973"计划(2011CB012800,2011CB012804)

Analysis of strain in electromagnetic V-shaped bending of 2024-T3 aviation aluminum alloy plate

XIONG Weiren, WANG Wenping, WAN Min, LI Xinjun

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2015-02-04 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-28
Supported by:
National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB012800,2011CB012804)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 金属塑性成形后的应变特征影响零件的力学性能和使用寿命。电磁成形技术能提高金属的成形性,有助于克服铝合金室温成形性低的缺点,因而得到重视。本文以2024-T3航空铝合金板为研究对象,开展了电磁V弯成形和传统机械V弯成形的实验及数值模拟,研究了2种成形方法对弯曲成形试件V形弯曲圆角位置沿试件长度方向的应变特征的影响。数值模型表明,电磁V弯试件弯曲圆角处的拉应变峰值低于机械V弯试件;电磁V弯实验件的拉应变峰值比机械V弯试件低13.9%。同时,与机械V弯试件相比,电磁V弯试件有更大区域的金属材料参与了弯曲变形。

关键词: 电磁成形, V弯, 应变, 性能, 铝合金

Abstract: The mechanical properties and service life of parts are influenced by the strain characteristics after metal forming process which causes plastic deformation. Meanwhile, the electromagnetic forming (EMF) gets more attention for the advantage that it can help to overcome the drawback of low formability of aluminum alloys at room temperature by improving the formability. Therefore, the aviation aluminum alloy plate of 2024-T3 was used as the study object. And, the experiments and numerical simulations of V-bending process by both EMF and conventional mechanical method were carried out. The influence of two forming methods on the strain characteristics at the V-shaped corner which is along the longitudinal direction of the specimen was studied. The results show that the tensile strain at the outside of the V-shaped corner of the numerical virtual part formed by EMF is smaller than that formed by mechanical method, and the peak value of tensile strain of actual part formed by EMF is lower by 13.9% as well. In addition, compared with mechanical method, a larger proportion of metal sheet formed by EMF gets involved in the bending deformation.

Key words: electromagnetic forming, V-bending, strain, performance, aluminum alloy

中图分类号:

熊威人, 王文平, 万敏, 李新军. 2024-T3航空铝合金板材电磁V形弯曲应变分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(1): 158-164.

XIONG Weiren, WANG Wenping, WAN Min, LI Xinjun. Analysis of strain in electromagnetic V-shaped bending of 2024-T3 aviation aluminum alloy plate[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2016, 42(1): 158-164.

参考文献

[1] MAMALIS A G,MANOLAKOS D E,KLADAS A G,et al.Electromagnetic forming and powder processing:Trends and developments[J].Applied Mechanics Reviews,2004,57(4):299-324.
[2] GOLOVASHCHENKO S F.Material formability and coil design in electromagnetic forming[J].Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,2007,16(3):314-320.
[3] SHANG J H,DAEHN G.Electromagnetically assisted sheet metal stamping[J].Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2011,211(5):868-874.
[4] PSYK V,RISCH D,KINSEY B L,et al.Electromagnetic forming-A review[J].Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2011,211(5):787-829.
[5] PARK H I,KIM D,LEE J,et al.Experimental study on electromagnetic forming of high strength steel sheets with different dimensions of aluminum driver plate[C]//Proceedings of ICHSF 2014.Dortmund:Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction,TU Dortmund University,2014:237-242.
[6] IRIONDO E,ALCARAZ J L,DAEHN G S,et al.Shape calibration of high strength metal sheets by electromagnetic forming[J].Journal of Manufacturing Processes,2013,15(2):183-193.
[7] IRIONDO E,GUTIERREZ M A,GONZALEZ B,et al.Electromagnetic impulse calibration of high strength sheet metal structures[J].Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2011,211(5):909-915.
[8] LEE P S,PIEHLER H R,ADAMS B L,et al.Influence of surface texture on orange peel in aluminum[J].Journal of Materials Processing Technology,1998,80-81(3):315-319.
[9] POLÁK J.Plastic strain-controlled short crack growth and fatigue life[J].International Journal of Fatigue,2005,27(10-12):1192-1201.
[10] AL-RUBAIE K S,DEL GRANDE M A,TRAVESSA D N,et al.Effect of pre-strain on the fatigue life of 7050-T7451 aluminium alloy[J].Materials Science and Engineering:A,2007,464(1-2):141-150.
[11] 刘大海,周文华,李春峰.电磁力体积力效应对AA5052板材动态成形性的影响[J].塑性工程学报,2013,20(6):62-67. LIU D H,ZHOU W H,LI C F.Influence of body force effect of the pulsed magnetic forces on the dynamic forming limits of AA5052 sheets[J].Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2013,20(6):62-67(in Chinese).
[12] VANBENTHYSEN R,THIBAUDEAU E,KINSEY B L.Effect of specimen planar area on electromagnetic flanging[J].Journal of Manufacturing Processes,2013,15(2):194-200.
[13] GAO X,KIM J.Modeling of ductile fracture:Significance of void coalescence[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,2006,43(20):6277-6293.
[14] BARTELS G,SCHÄTZING W,SCHEIBE H P,et al.Comparison of two different simulation algorithms for the electromagnetic tube compression[J].International Journal of Material Forming,2009,2(S1):693-696.
[15] SOHONI G S,WALAME M V,TANDON V,et al.Dynamic behavior characterization of lead at high strain rates using high speed photography for finite element simulation[C]//Proceedings of IMECE 2005.New York:ASME,2005:1-6.
[16] XIONG W R,WANG W P,WAN M,et al.Effect of the duration of electromagnetic pulse force on the rebound suppression in V-bend experiment[C]//Proceedings of ICHSF 2014.Dortmund:Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction,TU Dortmund University,2014:335-344.

2024-T3航空铝合金板材电磁V形弯曲应变分析

Analysis of strain in electromagnetic V-shaped bending of 2024-T3 aviation aluminum alloy plate

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	靳涛, 胡小平, 于保华. 大端接圆柱杆的复合圆锥形变幅杆设计及应用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(8): 1630-1638.
[2]	谭治学, 钟诗胜, 林琳. 多源数据融合的民航发动机修后性能预测[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(6): 1106-1113.
[3]	张畅, 谢荣建, 张添, 鲁得浦, 吴亦农, 洪芳军. 液氮温区平板蒸发器环路热管实验研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(6): 1211-1217.
[4]	洪杰, 杨哲夫, 吕春光, 马艳红. 高速柔性转子系统动力特性稳健设计方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(5): 855-862.
[5]	李小兵, 赵思源, 卜祥伟, 何阳光. 高超声速飞行器预设性能反演控制方法设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(4): 650-661.
[6]	回丽, 陈晓伟, 周松, 杨文军, 王磊. 激光焊接带口盖加筋壁板剪切性能分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(3): 446-453.
[7]	陈坤, 舒茂盛, 胡仁伟, 郭鑫, 程羽佳, 程小全. 带衬套沉头螺栓复合材料/金属接头拉伸性能[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(3): 633-640.
[8]	魏祥灰, 唐超颖, 王彪. 基于空间两点的视觉自主着陆导引算法设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(2): 357-365.
[9]	肖楚晗, 李炯, 雷虎民, 王华吉. 基于AVSIMM算法的高超声速再入滑翔目标跟踪[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(2): 413-421.
[10]	郑煜坤, 王瑛, 李超, 亓尧, 李正欣. 基于航路点布局的多目标网络结构优化方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(1): 1-9.
[11]	洪杰, 徐翕如, 苏志敏, 马艳红. 高速转子连接结构刚度损失及振动特性[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(1): 18-25.
[12]	张献民, 刘小兰, 张子文. 基于振动特性的机场刚性道面传荷性能[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(9): 1787-1796.
[13]	王帅, 刘慧丛, 李卫平, 朱立群, 石文静, 施丽铭. 载荷作用下5A06铝合金焊接试样的腐蚀敏感性[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(8): 1720-1726.
[14]	王凯, 何勇灵, 孟广威. 客车铝合金车架设计与典型工况分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(8): 1780-1786.
[15]	姬芬竹, 张梦杰, 王瑞, 王岩, 杜发荣. 冲压空气涡轮叶片设计和气动性能数值模拟[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(7): 1387-1394.