基于模糊TOPSIS的FMEA方法

杜晗恒; 彭翀

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0088

基于模糊TOPSIS的FMEA方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0088

杜晗恒,
彭翀^,

北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院, 北京 100083

基金项目: 国家重大科技专项(2010ZX04014-017);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(YWF-14-JXXY-004)

详细信息

作者简介:
杜晗恒男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:数控系统可靠性。Tel.:010-82316298 E-mail:duhanheng@163.com;彭翀男,博士,助理研究员。主要研究方向:制造服务与数控装备可靠性。Tel.:010-82316298 E-mail:pch@buaa.edu.cn

通讯作者:
彭翀,Tel.:010-82316298 E-mail:pch@buaa.edu.cn

中图分类号: V221⁺.3;TB553
计量
- 文章访问数: 1262
- HTML全文浏览量: 173
- PDF下载量: 525
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-02-09
- 网络出版日期: 2016-02-20

Failure mode and effects analysis method based on fuzzy TOPSIS

DU Hanheng,
PENG Chong^,

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 针对传统故障模式及影响分析(FMEA)中评价故障模式的影响因素和计算风险优先数存在的缺陷,提出了一种基于模糊逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)的FMEA方法。该方法采用模糊置信结构对影响因素的评价进行表示,并通过去模糊化和加权平均建立明确置信矩阵。考虑各影响因素的权重对分析结果的重要性,将主、客观赋权法相结合来分配各影响因素的权重,进而建立加权规范化矩阵,根据相对贴近度的大小确定各故障模式的风险水平。最后,举例验证了该方法的可行性和有效性。
- 模糊置信结构 /
- 影响因素 /
- 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS) /
- 故障模式及影响分析(FMEA) /
- 风险水平
Abstract: Aiming at the defect of traditional failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in evaluating the effect factors of the failure mode and calculating the risk priority number, a FMEA method based on fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed. This method uses fuzzy belief structure to express the evaluation of the effect factors, and adopts defuzzification and the weighted average to establish the clear belief matrix. Moreover, considering the importance of the weights of the effect factors on analysis result, the weights are determined by the combination the subjective weighting method and the objective weighting method, then the weighted normalized matrix can be constructed, and the risk level of each failure mode is ranked in the order of the relative closeness. An example is taken to validate feasibility and effectiveness of the method.
- fuzzy belief structure /
- effect factor /
- technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) /
- failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) /
- risk level

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	陈颖,康锐.FMECA技术及其应用[M].2版.北京:国防工业出版社,2014:31-45. CHEN Y,KANG R.FMECA methodology and application[M].2nd ed.Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2014:31-45(in Chinese).
[2]	陈政平,付桂翠,赵幼虎.改进的风险优先数(RPN)分析方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2011,37(11):1395-1399. CHEN Z P,FU G C,ZHAO Y H.Improved analysis method of risk priority number[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2011,37(11):1395-1399(in Chinese).
[3]	PILLAY A,WANG J.Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2003,79(1):69-85.
[4]	WANG Y M,CHIN K S,POON G K K,et al.Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(2):1195-1207.
[5]	GARGAMA H,CHATURVEDI S K.Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2011,60(1):102-110.
[6]	CHIN K S,WANG Y M,POON G K K,et al.Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach[J].Computers & Operations Research,2009,36(6):1768-1779.
[7]	LIU H C,LIU L,BIAN Q H,et al.Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(4):4403-4415.
[8]	GARCIA P A A,SCHIRRU R.A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA[J].Progress in Nuclear Energy,2005,46(3):359-373.
[9]	王贵宝,黄洪钟,张小玲.风险可能数——一种基于最大信息熵理论的风险度量和风险排序新方法[J].航空学报,2009,30(9):1683-1690. WANG G B,HUANG H Z,ZHANG X L.Risk possibility number-a new model for risk evaluation and prioritization based on maximum entropy theory[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2009,30(9):1683-1690(in Chinese).
[10]	KUTLU A C,EKMEKÇIO LU M.Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(1):61-67.
[11]	BRAGLIA M,FROSOLINI M,MONTANARI R.Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode,effects and criticality analysis[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2003,19(5):425-443.
[12]	LIU H C,LIU L,LIN Q L.Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2013,62(1):23-36.
[13]	CHEN C B,KLEIN C M.A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics-Part B:Cybernetics,1997,27(1):26-35.
[14]	SONG W,MIN G X,WU Z,et al.Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS[J].International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2013,26(12):1172-1186.
[15]	廖炎平,刘莉,龙腾.基于多属性决策的气动隐身多目标优化[J].机械工程学报,2013,48(13):132-140. LIAO Y P,LIU L,LONG T.Multi-objective aerodynamic and stealthy performance optimization based on multi-attribute decision making[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2013,48(13):132-140(in Chinese).
[16]	王海巧,孙蓓蓓.基于实例推理的数控刀架快速设计方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版)2013,43(6):1232-1237. WANG H Q,SUN B B.Rapid design method of CNC turret based on case-based reasoning[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition),2013,43(6):1232-1237(in Chinese).
[17]	张海波,贾亚洲,周广文,等.数控系统故障模式、影响及危害度分析(FMECA)[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(6):491-494. ZHANG H B,JIA Y Z,ZHOU G W,et al.Failure mode,effects and criticality analysis(FMECA) of CNC system[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2004,15(6):491-494(in Chinese).
[18]	战国璋.基于模糊理论的数控立式车床可靠性预计及故障分析技术[D].长春:吉林大学,2014:18-20. ZHAN G Z.Reliability prediction and fault analysis technology of CNC vertical lathe based on fuzzy theory[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2014:18-20(in Chinese).