电动伺服舵系统动力学建模及颤振分析

张仁嘉; 吴志刚; 杨超

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0448

电动伺服舵系统动力学建模及颤振分析

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0448

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11372023）

详细信息

作者简介:
张仁嘉男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:气动伺服弹性力学。Tel.: 010-82313376 E-mail: zhrj559@163.com;吴志刚男,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:气动伺服弹性力学。Tel.: 010-82317510 E-mail: wuzhigang@buaa.edu.cn

通讯作者:
吴志刚,Tel.: 010-82317510 E-mail: wuzhigang@buaa.edu.cn

中图分类号: V211.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 836
- HTML全文浏览量: 36
- PDF下载量: 580
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-07-03
- 网络出版日期: 2016-07-20

Dynamic modeling and flutter analysis of a fin-actuator system

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 舵机动力学对舵系统颤振有最直接影响，其动力学模型的准确建立是颤振分析的关键。以某电动伺服舵系统为对象，分别建立了电机、减速器及控制回路模型。基于其地面振动试验（GVT）数据特征，考虑了减速器中零部件间隙及滚珠丝杠间接触刚度2类非线性因素。动力学仿真结果复现了试验现象，证明了接触刚度和间隙对该伺服舵系统动力学特征的主导作用。在颤振分析中，对比了接触刚度和常数刚度2种假设下，舵机在不同阶跃角指令下的舵偏角响应。发现常数刚度下舵系统仅存在极限环（LCO）和失稳2个域，临界速度不会随间隙大小而变化；而接触刚度下存在稳定、LCO和失稳3个域，且相同风速下，其临界指令角较常数刚度假设更高，但其临界速度却会随间隙增大而减小，甚至小于常数刚度假设，应引起足够重视。
- 气动弹性 /
- 颤振 /
- 非线性 /
- 接触刚度 /
- 间隙 /
- 舵机
Abstract: Dynamics of an actuator has a direct impact on the flutter characteristics of a fin structure. Thus it is important to build the dynamic model of the fin-actuator system precisely before a flutter analysis. A typical fin-actuator system is investigated by constructing its motor model, reducer model and controller model, respectively. Based on the characteristics of the ground vibration test (GVT) data, two nonlinear factors are considered including the contact stiffness between the screw and the balls, as well as the freeplay. Simulation results reproduce what were seen in the test. It is found that the contact stiffness and freeplay dominate the dynamic characteristics of the fin-actuator system. In the flutter analysis, the angular responses of the actuator stimulated by different angular step commands under both contact stiffness assumption and constant stiffness assumption are compared. The results show that a limit cycle ossllation (LCO) domain and an unstable domain exist under the constant stiffness. Its critical velocities do not vary with the freeplays. However, besides the LCO and unstable domains, a stable domain appears under the contact stiffness. At a specific flow velocity, its critical command angle is higher than the one under constant stiffness. But its critical velocity decreases as the freeplay increases, and even reaches a lower level than the critical velocity under constant stiffness. Enough attention should be paid to this issue.
- aeroelasticity /
- flutter /
- nonlinear /
- contact stiffness /
- freeplay /
- actuator

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	YEHEZKELY E,KARPEL M.Nonlinear flutter analysis of missiles with pneumatic fin actuators[J].Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,1996,19(3):664-670.
[2]	SHIN W H,LEE I,SHIN Y S,et al.Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis for a control fin with an actuator[J].Journal of Aircraft,2007,44(2):597-605.
[3]	张新榃,吴志刚,杨超.考虑舵机动力学的舵系统颤振分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2011,37(8): 927-932.ZHANG X T,WU Z G,YANG C.Flutter analysis for rudder considering actuator's dynamics[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2011,37(8):927-932(in Chinese).
[4]	ZHANG X T,WU Z G,YANG C.New flutter-suppression method for a missile fin with an actuator[J].Journal of Aircraft,2013,50(3):989-994.
[5]	YANG N,WU Z G,YANG C.Structural nonlinear flutter characteristics analysis for an actuator-fin system with dynamic stiffness[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2011,24(5):590-599.
[6]	VALENTIN L P.Contact mechanics and frictions[M].Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1987:64-68.
[7]	张学良,黄玉美,傅卫平,等.粗糙表面法向接触刚度的分形模型[J].应用力学学报,2000,17(2): 31-35.ZHANG X L,HUANG Y M,FU W P,et al.Fractal model of normal contact stiffness between rough surfaces[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics,2000,17(2):31-35(in Chinese).
[8]	KATUHIRO N,KAZUKI T.Stiffness of a pre-loaded ball screw[J].Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers,1987,53(492):1898-1904.
[9]	KRIPA K V,SAMIR A N.The dynamics of lead-screw drives: Low-order modeling and experiments[J].Journal of Dynamic Systems,Measurement,and Control,2004,126(2):388-396.
[10]	XIAO H,BRENNAN M J,SHAO Y M.On the undamped free vibration of a mass interacting with a Hertzian contact stiffness[J].Mechanics Research Communications,2011,38(8):560-564.
[11]	KONO D,INAGAKI T,MATSUBARA A,et al.Stiffness model of machine tool supports using contact stiffness[J].Precision Engineering,2013,37(3):650-657.
[12]	KONO D,NISHIO S,YAMAJI I,et al.A method for stiffness tuning of machine tool supports considering contact stiffness[J].International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,2015,90:50-59.
[13]	ZHANG R J,WU Z G,YANG C.Fin-actuator system modeling and experimental validating for aeroelastic research[C]//56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics,and Materials Conference.Reston:AIAA,2015.
[14]	GLADWELL G M L.Branch mode analysis of vibrating systems[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1964,1(1):41-59.
[15]	KARPEL M.Extensions to the minimum-state aeroelastic modeling method[J].AIAA Journal,1991,29(11):2007-2009.