基于自由胀形的弯曲管材变形行为

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0525

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1395-1402.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0525

基于自由胀形的弯曲管材变形行为

孔德帅¹, 郎利辉^1,2, 阮尚文¹

1. 北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院, 北京 100083;
2. 北京航空航天大学先进航空发动机协同创新中心, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-06-20 修回日期:2016-09-21 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2016-11-16
通讯作者: 郎利辉,E-mail:lang@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:lang@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:孔德帅男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:充液成形技术;郎利辉男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:液压柔性成形技术与装备。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2014ZX04002041）；国家自然科学基金（51175024）

Deformation behavior of a bent tube based on free expansion

KONG Deshuai¹, LANG Lihui^1,2, RUAN Shangwen¹

1. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-06-20 Revised:2016-09-21 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2016-11-16
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project (2014ZX04002041); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175024)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着制造业轻量化的发展趋势，复杂弯曲异形充液成形管件的应用日益广泛。为了更好地研究弯曲异形复杂管件在充液成形过程中的变形规律，进行可靠的工艺设计。本文通过结合薄膜理论和塑性变形理论对弯曲管件在自由胀形状态下的应力应变进行了理论解析，并通过有限元（FE）分析对理论计算模型进行了验证。FE分析结果与理论模型基本吻合。同时分析了管材在绕弯过程的硬化行为，并探索了在不同的弯曲硬化状态下弯曲管材在自由胀形过程下的破裂位置的规律，并且用实验进行了验证，实验结果与FE分析结果吻合。

关键词: 充液成形, 弯曲, 变形行为, 硬化, 破裂

Abstract: As the development of lightweight design in manufacture industry, the application of thin-walled bent hollow tubes with various sections is expanding widely. In order to study the deformation behavior of bent tubes during hydroforming process and have a reliable process design, a theoretical model of free-expansion bent tubes based on membrane theory and plastic theory was put forward, and the model was verified by finite element (FE) analysis. The FE analysis results show good agreement with the theoretical model. The stresses distribution and deformation behavior were revealed. Finally, the work-hardening behavior during rotary draw bending was analyzed, and meanwhile, the fracture site of pre-bent tubes with different work-hardening states during free-expansion process was explored. The experimental results show good agreement with the FE analysis results.

Key words: hydroforming, bending, deformation behavior, work-hardening, fracture

中图分类号:

TG394

孔德帅, 郎利辉, 阮尚文. 基于自由胀形的弯曲管材变形行为[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(7): 1395-1402.

KONG Deshuai, LANG Lihui, RUAN Shangwen. Deformation behavior of a bent tube based on free expansion[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2017, 43(7): 1395-1402.

参考文献

[1] ZENG Y S,LI Z Q.Experimental research on the tube push-bending process [J].Journal of Material Processing Technology,2002,122(2-3):237-240.
[2] 苑世剑.现代液压成形技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2009:8-9.YUAN S J.Modern hydroforming technology[M].Beijing: National Defence Industry Press,2009:8-9(in Chinese).
[3] KEELER S P,BACKOFEN W A.Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches[J].ASM Transactions Quarterly,1963,56:25-48.
[4] GOODWIN G M.Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming in the press shop:680093[R].Warrendale,PA:SAE,1968.
[5] MUAMMER K,TAYLAN A.Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process [J].International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,2002,42(1):123-138.
[6] KIM S W,SONG W J,KANG B S,et al.Analytical and number approach to prediction of forming limit in tube hydroforming [J].International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,2005,47(7):1023-1037.
[7] HWANG Y M,LIN Y K,CHUANG H C.Forming limit diagrams of tubular materials by bulge test [J].Journal of Material Processing Technology,2009,209(11):5024-5034.
[8] CHEN X F,LI S H,YU Z Q,et al.Study on experimental approaches of forming limit curve for tube hydroforming [J].International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2012,61(1):87-100.
[9] LANG L H,CAI G S,LIU K N,et al.Investigation on the effect of through thickness normal stress on forming limit at elevated temperature by using modified M-K model[J].International Journal of Material Forming,2015,8(2):211-228.
[10] 崔晓磊,王小松,林艳丽,等.管材流体压力成形三维成形极限图[J].塑性工程学报,2014,21(5):1-5.CUI X L,WANG X S,LIN Y L,et al.Three-dimension forming limit diagram for fluid pressure forming of tubes [J].Journal of Plasticity Engineering,2014,21(5):1-5(in Chinese).
[11] 杨希英,郎利辉,刘康宁,等.基于修正M-K模型的铝合金板材成形极限图预测[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2015,41(4):675-679.YANG X Y,LANG L H,LIU K N,et al.Prediction of forming limit diagram of AA7075-O aluminum alloy sheet based on modified M-K model [J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2015,41(4):675-679(in Chinese).
[12] GRAF A,HOSFORD W.Calculations of forming limit diagrams for changing strain paths[J].Metallurgical Transactions A,1993,24:2503-2512.
[13] KLEEMOLA H J,PELKKIKANGAS M T.Effect of predeformation and strain path on the forming limits of steel copper and brass [J].Sheet Metal Industries,1977,63:591-599.
[14] STOUGHTON T B.A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming [J].International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,1999,42(1):1-27.
[15] YOSHIDA K,KUWABARA T.Effect of strain hardening behavior on forming limit stresses of steel tube subjected to nonproportional loading paths [J].International Journal of Plasticity,2007,23(7):1260-1284.
[16] SINGH H.Computer simulation of tubular hydroforming [J].Tube & Pipe Journal,2000,11:8-13.

基于自由胀形的弯曲管材变形行为

Deformation behavior of a bent tube based on free expansion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董虎, 林苗, 顾苏程, 曹毅, 李巍. 多向气动驱动器软体仿生舌弯曲状态的研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(9): 1882-1893.
[2]	颜灿林, 贺小帆, 李玉海. 一种起落架载荷谱相似性判别方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(4): 752-759.
[3]	马艳红, 刘海舟, 邓旺群, 杨海, 洪杰. 具有初始热变形的转子系统振动响应分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(2): 227-233.
[4]	郭轩, 关志东, 邱诚, 黎增山. 蜂窝夹芯挖补修理结构弯曲性能研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(7): 1528-1536.
[5]	徐琅, 李卫东, 王秀凤, 万敏. 预载荷下板料激光弯曲成形的工艺参数分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(6): 1149-1154.
[6]	王华, 康荣杰, 王兴坚, 戴建生. 软体弯曲驱动器设计与建模[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(5): 1053-1060.
[7]	葛宇龙, 李晓星, 郎利辉, 程鹏志. 基于机器学习的管材数控弯曲质量预测[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(8): 1691-1697.
[8]	范孝良, 吴学华, 王进峰, 康文利. 高速切削高温合金GH4169数值模拟与实验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(7): 1344-1351.
[9]	郑垒, 林承键, 张高龙, 贾会明, 张焕乔. ¹⁷F+⁵⁸Ni弹性散射和破裂反应实验装置的设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(9): 1708-1713.
[10]	胡晶, 姚仰平. 基于考虑时间效应UH模型的一维固结分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(8): 1492-1498.
[11]	程鹏志, 郎利辉, 葛宇龙, 阮尚文, 王韬, 武海. 力约束管材自由胀形试验研究与材料性能测试[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(4): 686-692.
[12]	周子同, 陈志同, 熊曦耀, 徐义平. 钛合金TB6侧铣表面完整性实验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(6): 849-854.
[13]	姜金朋, 陈涛, 金平, 王珏. Chaboche随动硬化模型参数确定及棘轮效应[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(10): 1430-1435.
[14]	周子同, 陈志同, 蒋理科, 李秀琴. 钛合金TB6铣削加工硬化实验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(1): 135-140.
[15]	杨进慧, 陈涛, 金平, 蔡国飙. 可重复使用火箭发动机再生冷却槽失效分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(9): 1187-1191.