-
摘要:
为探索利用射流技术降低进气道起动马赫数的可行性,对二元高超声速进气道二维流场进行了数值模拟,通过对比不同工况的流场结构、流量系数及总压恢复系数,分析了射流对高超声速进气道的作用效果,并研究了射流速度、压强及倾角对进气道起动性能的影响。分析结果表明:施加射流,激波与进气道边界层原有干扰形式发生改变,是降低进气道起动马赫数的主要原因。研究还表明,增大射流速度利于提高控制效果,但持续增大射流速度,会造成隔离段反压升高,并且这一现象与射流压强相关,降低射流压强能使进气道起动的射流速度区间扩大,同时在不同射流倾角下,上述规律表现一致。该研究揭示了进气道起动能力随射流参数变化的系统性规律,可用于指导工程设计及优化。
Abstract:In order to explore the feasibility of using injection technology to reduce the start Mach number of hypersonic inlet, the flow field of the two-dimensional hypersonic inlet was calculated by numerical simulation. The effect of injection on the hypersonic inlet was analyzed by comparing the flow field structure, mass-captured coefficient and total pressure recovery coefficient under different working conditions, and the influence of jet velocity, pressure and angle of inclination on starting performance of the inlet was also studied. The analysis results show that the change of original interference form of the shock wave and inlet boundary-layer is the main reason for the reduction of the start Mach number of inlet. The study also shows that increasing jet velocity is conducive to improving the control effect, but increasing jet velocity continuously would result in an increase in the back pressure of the isolation section. This phenomenon is related to the jet pressure, and reducing the jet pressure could expand the effective jet velocity range to start the inlet. At different jet angles of inclination, the above rules are consistent. The simulation results reveal the systematic rule of changes of the inlet starting ability with injection parameters, which can be used to guide engineering design and optimization.
-
Key words:
- hypersonic inlet /
- shock wave/boundary-layer interaction /
- flow control /
- injection /
- start
-
表 1 不同马赫数下的总压恢复系数及流量系数
Table 1. Total pressure recovery coefficient and mass-captured coefficient under different Mach numbers
工况 总压恢复系数/% 流量系数/% Ma∞=3.30 69.00 53.69 Ma∞=3.28 27.62 26.65 Ma∞=3.20 28.28 24.80 表 2 不同射流压强及速度的起动特性
Table 2. Starting characteristics under different jet pressure and velocities
射流压强 Vjet/ain 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 8.0 Pj1 un st Pj2 un st st st Pj3 un st st Pj4 un st st st Pj5 un un st st st st Pj6 un un st st st st Pj7 un st st st st st un Pj8 un st un un Pj9 un un un un 表 3 不同射流倾角及速度下的起动特性(PjA)
Table 3. Starting characteristics at different jet angles and velocities (PjA)
θj/(°) Vjet/ain 3.65 4.0 4.5 5.0 9 un st st st 19 st st st st 29 un st st st 39 un st st st 49 un un st st 59 un un un st 79 un un un 表 4 不同射流倾角及速度下的起动特性(PjB)
Table 4. Starting characteristics at different jet angles and velocities (PjB)
θj/(°) Vjet/ain 4.5 5.0 6.0 7.0 9 un st st st 19 un st st st 29 un st st 39 un st st 49 un un un 59 un un un 79 un un un -
[1] HABERLE J, GULHAN A.Investigation of the performance of a scramjet inlet at Mach 6 with boundary layer bleed:AIAA-2006-8139[R].Reston:AIAA, 2006. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-8139 [2] SMART M K, TREXLER C A.Mach 4 performance of hypersonic inlet with rectangular-to-elliptical shape transition[J].Journal of Propulsion and Powder, 2004, 20(2):288-293. doi: 10.2514/1.1296 [3] WHITE M E, LEE R E, THOMPSON M W, et al.Tangential mass addition for shock/boundary-layer interaction control in scramjet inlets[J].Journal of Propulsion, 1991, 7(6):1023-1029. doi: 10.2514/3.23422 [4] ROZARIO D, ZOUAOUI Z.Computational fluid dynamic analysis of scramjet inlet:AIAA-2007-0030[R].Reston:AIAA, 2007. [5] BITYURIN V A, BOCHAROV A N, LINEBERRY J T, et al.Experimental and theoretical study of MHD interaction in hypersonic ionized air flow over a wedge:AIAA-2004-1194[R].Reston:AIAA, 2004. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-1194 [6] SHEIKIN E G, KURANOW A L.MHD control in hypersonic aircraft:AIAA-2005-1335[R].Reston:AIAA, 2005. [7] GORTON S, OWENS L, JENKINS L, et al.Active flow control on a boundary-layer-ingesting inlet:AIAA-2004-1203[R].Reston:AIAA, 2004. [8] ALLAN B, OWEN L, BERRIER B.Numerical modeling of active flow control in a boundary layer ingesting offset inlet:AIAA-2004-2318[R].Reston:AIAA, 2004. [9] VAN WIE D M, KWOK F T, WALSH R T.Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets:AIAA-1996-2914[R].Reston:AIAA, 1996. [10] FENG X P, LIN Z Y, ZHENG Y, et al.Adjusting principle of gas jet controlling inlet and numerical verification[J].Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(11):2981-2986. doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4553-3 [11] 方传波, 夏智勋, 胡建新, 等.基于主动射流控制的二元混压式进气道起动特性研究[J].固体火箭技术, 2010, 33(3):280-284. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gthjjs201003010FANG C B, XIA Z X, HU J X, et al.Study on starting characteristics of a two-dimensional supersonic inlet based on actve injection control[J].Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2010, 33(3):280-284(in Chinese). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gthjjs201003010 [12] EMAMI S, TREXLER C A, AUSLENDER A H, et al.Experimental investigation of inlet-combustor isolators for a dual-mode scramjet at a Mach number of 4:NASA Technical Paper 3502[R].Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1995. [13] 林博希, 阎超, 李亚超.喷流干扰气动热数值模拟的若干影响因素[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(6):1210-1218. http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13974.shtmlLIN B X, YAN C, LI Y C.Some influence factors in aerodynamic heat transfer numerical simulation of jet-interaction flow[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(6):1210-1218(in Chinese). http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13974.shtml [14] PATRICK E R, EMAMI S, CARL A T.Unsteady pressure behavior in a ramjet/scramjet inlet[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12(3):486-493. doi: 10.2514/3.24061 [15] COX C, LEWIS C, PAP R.Prediction of unstart phenomena in hypersonic aircraft:AIAA-1995-6018[R].Reston:AIAA, 1995.