基于切换系统的变体飞行器鲁棒自适应控制

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0377

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 538-545.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0377

基于切换系统的变体飞行器鲁棒自适应控制

梁小辉¹, 王青¹, 董朝阳²

1. 北京航空航天大学自动化科学与电气工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-04-04
通讯作者: 王青,E-mail:wangqing@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:wangqing@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:梁小辉,男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:切换控制、故障诊断与容错控制;王青,女,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:切换控制、故障诊断、飞行器控制。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61873295，61833016）；航空科学基金（2016ZA51011）

Robust adaptive control for morphing aircraft based on switching system

LIANG Xiaohui¹, WANG Qing¹, DONG Chaoyang²

1. School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2018-06-20 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-04-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对变体飞行器变形过程的控制问题，将切换系统理论与多变量自适应控制理论相结合，提出了一种基于切换系统的鲁棒自适应控制器设计方法。首先，建立了变体飞行器纵向短周期线性切换模型，描述了飞行器的整个变形过程；然后，设计了一种改进的鲁棒自适应控制律，抑制了各类干扰和不确定性对系统的影响，实现了切换系统对参考模型的良好跟踪；最后，提出了一种基于模型依赖驻留时间（MDDT）的切换控制律，保证了变体飞行器在变形切换过程中的稳定性，利用Lyapunov函数方法证明了本文方法最终一致有界。仿真验证表明，在存在外部干扰和各类不确定性的情况下，本文方法能保证飞行器在变形过程中精确跟踪参考模型，且具有较好的抗干扰能力。

关键词: 变体飞行器, 切换系统, 鲁棒自适应控制, 模型依赖驻留时间(MDDT), 参考模型, 抗干扰

Abstract: For the morphing process control of morphing aircraft, by combining the switching system theory and the multivariable adaptive control theory, a robust adaptive controller design method based on the switched system is proposed in this paper. Frist, the longitudinal short-period linear switching model for morphing aircraft is established, which can describe the whole morphing process. Second, an improved robust adaptive control law to reject the external disturbance and uncertainties is designed, which can guarantee the switching system's good tracking of the reference model. Then, based on the mode-dependent dwell time, a switching control law is put forward, which ensures the stability of the morphing aircraft in morphing process. According to the Lyapunov function methods, the ultimate uniform bound of the proposed approach is proved. The simulation results show that the proposed approach can guarantee the accurate tracking of the reference model during the morphing process with good disturbance rejection ability under the conditions of external disturbance and various uncertainties.

Key words: morphing aircraft, switching system, robust adaptive control, mode-dependent dwell time (MDDT), reference model, disturbance rejection

中图分类号:

V249.1

梁小辉, 王青, 董朝阳. 基于切换系统的变体飞行器鲁棒自适应控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(3): 538-545.

LIANG Xiaohui, WANG Qing, DONG Chaoyang. Robust adaptive control for morphing aircraft based on switching system[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2019, 45(3): 538-545.

参考文献

[1] YUE T,ZHANG X Y,WANG L X,et al.Flight dynamic modeling and control for a telescopic wing morphing aircraft via asymmetric wing morphing[J].Aerospace Science & Technology,2017,70:328-338.
[2] JIANG W L,DONG C Y,WANG Q.A systematic method of smooth switching LPV controllers design for a morphing aircraft[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2015,28(6):1640-1649.
[3] 殷明,陆宇平,何真.变体飞行器LPV建模与鲁棒增益调度控制[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2013,45(2):202-208.YIN M,LU Y P,HE Z.LPV Modeling and robust gain scheduling control of morphing aircraft[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2013,45(2):202-208(in Chinese).
[4] AFONSO F,VALE J,LAU F,et al.Performance based multidisciplinary design optimization of morphing aircraft[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2017,67:1-12.
[5] AJAJ R M,BEAVERSTOCK C M,FRISWELL M I.Morphing aircraft:The need for a new design philosophy[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2016,49:154-166.
[6] SU H Q, HUANG Z, BAO X X,et al.Morphing process research of UAV with PID controller[J].Procedia Engineering,2015,99:873-877.
[7] WU Z H,LU J C,ZHOU Q,et al.Modified adaptive neural dynamic surface control for morphing aircraft with input and output constraints[J].Nonlinear Dynamics,2016,87(4):2367-2383.
[8] WANG L,LIU C S,GONG H J.A novel robust controller with command filter for uncertain morphing aircraft[J].International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering,2018,10(1):523-523.
[9] AHMADI A A,PARRILO P A.Sum of squares certificates for stability of planar, homogeneous, and switched systems[J].IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control,2017,62(10):5269-5273.
[10] YUAN S,SCHUTTER B D,BALDI S.Robust adaptive tracking control of uncertain slowly switched linear systems[J].Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems,2018,27:1-12.
[11] WANG R H,XING J C,XIANG Z R.Finite-time stability and stabilization of switched nonlinear systems with asynchronous switching[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2018,316(1):229-244.
[12] ZHAO X D,SHI P,YIN Y F,et al.New results on stability of slowly switched systems:A multiple discontinuous Lyapunov function approach[J].IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control,2016,62(7):3502-3509.
[13] HE X,ZHAO J.Multiple Lyapunov functions with blending for induced l₂-norm control of switched LPV systems and its application to an F-16 aircraft model[J].Asian Journal of Control,2014,16(1):149-161.
[14] 王青,王通,后德龙,等.基于速度线性化的变体飞行器鲁棒LPV控制[J].系统工程与电子技术,2014,36(6):1130-1136.WANG Q,WANG T,HOU D L,et al.Robust LPV control for morphing vehicles via velocity-based linearization[J].System Engineering and Electronics,2014,36(6):1130-1136(in Chinese).
[15] CHENG H Y, DONG C Y, JIANG W L,et al. Non-fragile switched H_∞ control for morphing aircraft with asynchronous switching[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2017,30(3):1127-1139.
[16] 江未来, 董朝阳, 王通,等. 变体飞行器平滑切换LPV鲁棒控制[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(1):66-72.JIANG W L, DONG C Y, WANG T,et al. Smooth switching LPV robust control for morphing aircraft[J].Control and Decision,2016,31(1):66-72(in Chinese).
[17] SEIGLER T M. Dynamics and control of morphing aircraft[D]. Charlottesville:Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005:30-55
[18] ZHAO X D, YIN S, LI H Y,et al.Switching stabilization for a class of slowly switched systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,2014,60(1):221-226.
[19] XU S Y, CHEN T W.Robust H_∞ control for uncertain stochastic systems with state delay[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,2002,47(12):2089-2094.
[20] TAO G.Multivariable adaptive control:A survey[J].Automatica,2014, 50(11):2737-2764.

基于切换系统的变体飞行器鲁棒自适应控制

Robust adaptive control for morphing aircraft based on switching system

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘少坤, 闫晓鹏, 栗苹, 于洪海. 脉冲多普勒引信抗周期调制干扰性能研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(5): 1018-1025.
[2]	马思迁, 董朝阳, 马鸣宇, 王青. 基于自适应通信拓扑四旋翼无人机编队重构控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(4): 841-850.
[3]	孔志杰, 郝新红, 栗苹, 闫晓鹏. 调频引信谐波时序检测抗干扰方法及实现[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(3): 549-555.
[4]	车畅畅, 王华伟, 倪晓梅, 洪骥宇. 基于深度学习的航空发动机故障融合诊断[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(3): 621-628.
[5]	贾臻, 董朝阳, 王青. 链式平滑切换变体飞行器LPV鲁棒跟踪控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(4): 831-841.
[6]	黎海涛, 钱一名. IQ通道失衡对同时收发认知抗干扰系统的影响[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(3): 449-456.
[7]	赵琳, 何锋, 熊华钢. 航空电子AFDX与AVB传输实时性抗干扰对比[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(12): 2359-2369.
[8]	温暖, 刘正华, 祝令谱, 李罗川, 周锐. 非仿射参数依赖LPV模型的变体飞行器H_∞控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(10): 2073-2080.
[9]	左环宇, 郝新红, 岳凯. 调频多普勒引信抗调幅干扰性能分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(10): 2163-2170.
[10]	俞立宏, 秦红磊, 李武涛, 郎荣玲. GNSS抗干扰天线阵不一致性对MUSIC算法的影响[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(8): 1747-1754.
[11]	郭晓陶, 王星, 周东青, 陈游, 程嗣怡. 基于卷积盲分离的强干扰下通信信号分离算法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(6): 1295-1302.
[12]	张杰, 吴森堂. 一种变体飞行器的动力学建模与动态特性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(1): 58-64.
[13]	莫凡, 王新龙. 一种新的SINS/GPS深组合导航系统设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(7): 994-1000.
[14]	江未来, 董朝阳, 王通, 王青. 基于控制分配的一类变体飞行器容错控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(3): 355-359.
[15]	李玮, 王青, 董朝阳. 一类非理想切换系统的H_∞控制器设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(10): 1405-1410.