留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

裂纹矩张量反演的传感器排布形式

孔岳 李敏 陈伟民

孔岳, 李敏, 陈伟民等 . 裂纹矩张量反演的传感器排布形式[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(7): 1380-1387. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0705
引用本文: 孔岳, 李敏, 陈伟民等 . 裂纹矩张量反演的传感器排布形式[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(7): 1380-1387. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0705
KONG Yue, LI Min, CHEN Weiminet al. Sensor arrangement in moment-tensor inversion for cracks[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(7): 1380-1387. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0705(in Chinese)
Citation: KONG Yue, LI Min, CHEN Weiminet al. Sensor arrangement in moment-tensor inversion for cracks[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(7): 1380-1387. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0705(in Chinese)

裂纹矩张量反演的传感器排布形式

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0705
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 11232012

国家自然科学基金 11372320

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孔岳  男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向:矩张量反演方法的工程应用和弹性波的数值模拟

    李敏  男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向:结构动力学

    通讯作者:

    李敏, E-mail: limin@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O347.4+1;P315

Sensor arrangement in moment-tensor inversion for cracks

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11232012

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11372320

More Information
  • 摘要:

    裂纹矩张量反演方法利用声发射信号求解裂纹信息,是一种有效的裂纹扩展实时监测方法。在工程应用中,传感器接收到的声发射信号总包含一定比例的噪声。噪声信号会影响矩张量反演精度,甚至导致错误结果。研究通过优化传感器排布形式来降低噪声对矩张量反演精度的影响。基于矩张量初至波反演方法,分析了传感器位置选择的理论基础。进而利用人工合成声发射信号,定量研究了在不同传感器排布形式下,矩张量反演精度对噪声的敏感度。结果表明:正五边形传感器排布形式具有较好的精度表现,这种排布形式将5个传感器布置在一个圆环上,相邻传感器的传感器-圆心连线的夹角为72°,第6个传感器布置在圆心。此时矩张量求解方程的条件数较小,当声发射信号幅值因为噪声发生变化时,求解结果具有较高的精度和稳定性。研究针对矩张量反演中的传感器位置选择问题,为相关工程实践提供了建议和理论依据。

     

  • 图 1  100种传感器随机排布形式反演得到的矩张量反演误差对比

    Figure 1.  Comparison of moment-tensor inversion errors calculated with 100 sensor stochastic arrangements

    图 2  图 1中矩张量反演误差最小的3个结果对应的传感器排布形式示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic of sensor arrangements corresponding to three moment-tensor inversion errors with minimum values in Fig. 1

    图 3  传感器正五边形排布形式示意图

    Figure 3.  Schematic of sensors with an arrangement of regular pentagon

    图 4  不同噪声水平下多种传感器排布形式反演得到的矩张量反演误差对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of moment-tensor inversion errors inverted with different sensor arrangements under different noise levels

    图 5  矩张量反演中不同传感器排布形式对应的方程组条件数对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of condition numbers of equation set corresponding to different sensor arrangements in moment-tensor inversion

  • [1] BAIG A, URBANCIC T.Microseismic moment tensors:A path to understanding FRAC growth[J].The Leading Edge, 2010, 29(3):320-324. doi: 10.1190/1.3353729
    [2] BAIG A, URBANCIC T, PRINCE M.Microseismic moment tensors: A path to understanding growth of hydraulic fractures[C]//Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.
    [3] BURRIDGE R, KNOPOFF L.Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1964, 54(6A):1875-1888.
    [4] KNOPOFF L, RANDALL M J.The compensated linear-vector dipole:A possible mechanism for deep earthquakes[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1970, 75(26):4957-4963. doi: 10.1029/JB075i026p04957
    [5] AKI K, PATTON H.Determination of seismic moment tensor using surface waves[J].Tectonophysics, 1978, 49(3-4):213- 222. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(78)90180-4
    [6] KANAMORI H, GIVEN J W.Use of long-period surface waves for rapid determination of earthquake-source parameters[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1981, 27(1):8-31. doi: 10.1016/0031-9201(81)90083-2
    [7] KANAMORI H, GIVEN J W.Use of long-period surface waves for rapid determination of earthquake source parameters 2.Preliminary determination of source mechanisms of large earthquakes(MS ≥ 6.5)in 1980[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1982, 30(2-3):260-268. doi: 10.1016/0031-9201(82)90112-1
    [8] SIPKIN S A. Interpretation of non-double-couple earthquake mechanisms derived from moment tensor inversion[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986, 91(B1):531-547. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB01p00531
    [9] JULIAN B R, MILLER A D, FOULGER G R.Non-double-couple earthquakes 1.Theory[J].Reviews of Geophysics, 1998, 36(4): 525-549.
    [10] AKI K, RICHARDS P G.Quantitative seismology[M].San Francisco, CA: W.H.Freeman & Co., 1980.
    [11] OHTSU M.Source inversion of acoustic emission waveform[J].Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1988, 1988(398):71-79.
    [12] HUDSON J A, PEARCE R G, ROGERS R M.Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94(B1):765-774. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB01p00765
    [13] DAHM T.Relative moment tensor inversion based on ray theory:Theory and synthetic tests[J].Geophysical Journal International, 1996, 124(1):245-257. doi: 10.1111/gji.1996.124.issue-1
    [14] CHAPMAN C H, LEANEY W S.A new moment-tensor decomposition for seismic events in anisotropic media[J].Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 188(1):343-370. doi: 10.1111/gji.2012.188.issue-1
    [15] GU C, MARZOUK Y M, TOKSÖKZ M.Bayesian moment tensor inversion and uncertainty quantification for induced seismicity:Uncertainties from both the location and velocity model[M]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017.Tulsa, OK:Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017:2784-2790.
    [16] STANCHITS S, VINCIGUERRA S, DRESEN G.Ultrasonic velocities, acoustic emission characteristics and crack damage of basalt and granite[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2006, 163(5):975-994. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=9410fd699cf83866b67a031d9a26f58e
    [17] HAMIEL Y, LYAKHOVSKY V, STANCHITS S, et al.Brittle deformation and damage-induced seismic wave anisotropy in rocks[J].Geophysical Journal International, 2009, 178(2):901-909. doi: 10.1111/gji.2009.178.issue-2
    [18] HUDSON J A.Overall properties of a cracked solid[J].Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2008, 88(2):371. doi: 10.1017-S0305004100057674/
    [19] 刘宁, 李敏, 陈伟民.基于EMT采用FEM研究含裂纹介质中弹性波传播机制[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(9):1686-1692. https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13430.shtml

    LIU N, LI M, CHEN W M.Wave propagation in cracked elastic media based on EMT using FEM[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(9):1689-1692(in Chinese). https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13430.shtml
    [20] FORD S R, DREGER D S, WALTER W R.Identifying isotropic events using a regional moment tensor inversion[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 2009, 114(B1):593-602. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0221070796/
    [21] MUSTAC M, TKALCIC H.On the use of data noise as a site-specific weight parameter in a hierarchical bayesian moment tensor inversion:The case study of the geysers and long valley caldera earthquakes[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2017, 107(4):1914-1922.
    [22] 傅一钦.页岩气水力压裂微地震波的时域-频域二维瞬时谱全波形分析[D].北京: 中国科学院大学, 2017.

    FU Y Q.Full-waveform analysis in time-frequency domain of micro-seismic wave during shale hydraulic fracturing[D].Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017(in Chinese).
    [23] ABDEL-AAL A A K, YAGI Y.Earthquake source characterization, moment tensor solutions, and stress field of small-moderate earthquakes occurred in the northern Red Sea Triple Junction[J].Geosciences Journal, 2017, 21(2):235-251. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=891c9c209213ca2df5c2fe4437d57234
    [24] CESCA S, HEIMANN S, KRIEGEROWSKI M, et al.Moment tensor inversion for nuclear explosions:What can we learn from the 6 January and 9 September 2016 nuclear tests, North Korea[J].Seismological Research Letters, 2017, 88(2):300-310. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2620d6f22b812029ee2fea3824f92796&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [25] DAVI R, VAVRYČUK V, CHARALAMPIDOU E-M, et al.Network sensor calibration for retrieving accurate moment tensors of acoustic emissions[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 62:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.004
    [26] KWIATEK G, CHARALAMPIDOU E-M, DRESEN G, et al.An improved method for seismic moment tensor inversion of acoustic emissions through assessment of sensor coupling and sensitivity to incidence angle[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 65:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.005
    [27] STIERLE E, VAVRYCUK V, KWIATEK G, et al.Seismic moment tensors of acoustic emissions recorded during laboratory rock deformation experiments:Sensitivity to attenuation and anisotropy[J].Geophysical Journal International, 2016, 205(1):38-50. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw009
    [28] 刘培洵, 陈顺云, 郭彦双, 等.声发射矩张量反演[J].地球物理学报, 2014, 57(3):858-866. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7958657

    LIU P X, CHEN S Y, GUO Y S, et al.Moment tensor inversion of acoustic emission[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(3):858-866(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7958657
    [29] OHTSU M.Acoustic emission theory for moment tensor analysis[J].Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 1995, 6(3):169-184. doi: 10.1080/09349849509409555
  • 加载中
图(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  689
  • HTML全文浏览量:  149
  • PDF下载量:  558
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-11-30
  • 录用日期:  2019-01-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2019-07-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答