SMSP jamming countermeasure method based on maximum entropy method and genetic algorithm
-
摘要:
线性调频(LFM)信号是现代雷达常用的发射信号,可以有效提高雷达的检测性能,然而频谱弥散(SMSP)干扰应用于主瓣自卫式干扰时,干扰信号强度远大于目标回波信号,能够对目标回波信号形成遮盖,是一种有效对抗LFM信号的干扰样式。利用干扰信号与目标回波信号时频特征的不同,通过广义S变换(GST)凸显时频特征差异。运用最大熵法和遗传算法(GA)求取时频滤波器的分割阈值。通过构造的时频滤波器达到干扰抑制的目的。仿真结果表明:当干信比(JSR)大于10 dB、信噪比(SNR)大于0 dB时, 所提方法具有较好的干扰抑制效果,其中最大信干噪比(SJNR)增益接近25 dB。
-
关键词:
- 最大熵法 /
- 遗传算法(GA) /
- 广义S变换(GST) /
- 频谱弥散(SMSP)干扰 /
- 主瓣干扰
Abstract:Linear frequency modulation (LFM) signal is a commonly used transmission signal of modern radar, which can effectively improve the detection performance of radar. However, when smeared spectrum (SMSP) jamming is applied to the main lobe self-defense, the intensity of the jamming signal is much higher than the target echo signal, and it can cover the target echo signal, which is an effective jamming pattern against LFM signal. In this paper, the difference in time-frequency characteristics of the jamming signal and the target echo signal is used to highlight the difference in time-frequency characteristics through the generalized S transform (GST), and then the maximum entropy method and genetic algorithm (GA) are used to obtain the segmentation threshold of the time-frequency filter. The purpose of jamming suppression is achieved through the constructed time-frequency filter. The simulation results show that when the jamming-to-signal ratio (JSR) is greater than 10 dB and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is greater than 0 dB, it has a better jamming suppression effect, and the maximum signal-to-jamming-plus-noise ratio (SJNR) gain is close to 25 dB.
-
表 1 遗传算法参数
Table 1. Genetic algorithm parameters
参数 数值 种群数 20 交叉概率 0.6 变异概率 0.01 最大迭代代数 100 -
[1] SCHLEHER D C. Electronic warfare in the information age[M]. Boston: Artech House, 2000: 198-199. [2] SPARROW M J, CIKALO J. ECM techniques to counter pulse compression radar: US, 7081846[P]. 2006-07-25. [3] 李飞, 李国林, 粘朋雷. 基于盲源分离的雷达信号欺骗干扰抑制[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2015, 30(5): 424-428. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJHK201505005.htmLI F, LI G L, NIAN P L. Radar signal deception jamming suppressing based on blind source separation[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2015, 30(5): 424-428(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJHK201505005.htm [4] 尹洪伟, 李国林, 路翠华. 一种基于复值盲分离的欺骗干扰抑制算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(10): 1564-1569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJT201510023.htmYIN H W, LI G L, LU C H. An algorithm of deception jamming suppression based on complex-value blind source separation[J] Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(10): 1564-1569(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJT201510023.htm [5] DING L M, LI R F, DAI L Y, et al. Discrimination and identification between mainlobe repeater jamming and target echo via sparse recovery[J]. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2017, 11(2): 235-242. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0109 [6] 卢云龙, 李明, 曹润清, 等. 联合时频分布和压缩感知对抗频谱弥散干扰[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(12): 3275-3281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYX201612041.htmLU Y L, LI M, CAO R Q, et al. Jointing time-frequency distribution and compressed sensing for countering smeared spectrum jamming[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2016, 38(12): 3275-3281(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYX201612041.htm [7] 卢云龙, 李明, 陈洪猛, 等. 基于熵特征的DRFM有源欺骗干扰CFAR检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(4): 732-738. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201604003.htmLU Y L, LI M, CHEN H M, et, al. CFAR detection of DRFM deception jamming based on entropy feature[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics Technology, 2016, 38(4): 732-738(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201604003.htm [8] 赵源. 相控阵雷达及组网抗有源假目标与虚假航迹方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2019.ZHAO Y. Research on phased array radar and its network ECCM against active false target and phantom track jamming[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology, 2019(in Chinese). [9] 赵杨, 尚朝轩, 韩壮志, 等. 分数阶傅里叶和压缩感知自适应抗频谱弥散干扰[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(5): 1047-1054. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYX201905005.htmZHAO Y, SHANG C X, HAN Z Z, et al. Fractional Fourier transform and compressed sensing adaptive countering smeared spectrum jamming[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2019, 41(5): 1047-1054(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYX201905005.htm [10] 张亮, 王国宏, 李思文. 线性正则域抑制频谱弥散干扰方法[J]. 信号处理, 2020, 36(3): 328-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXCN202003003.htmZHANG L, WANG G H, LI S W. SMSP jamming suppression methods in linear canonical domain[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2020, 36(3): 328-336(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXCN202003003.htm [11] 原慧, 王春阳, 安磊, 等. 基于信号重构的频谱弥散干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(5): 960-967. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201705002.htmYUAN H, WANG C Y, AN L, et al. Smeared spectrum jamming suppression method based on signal reconstruction[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics Technology, 2017, 39(5): 960-967(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYD201705002.htm [12] WU C Z, CHEN B X, YANG M L, et al. A study on parameter estimation and suppression for smeared spectrum jamming based on short-time Fourier transform[J]. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, 115(1): 1-16. [13] 周长霖, 王春阳, 宫健, 等. 基于干扰重构和盲源分离的混合极化抗SMSP干扰[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(9): 1841-1848. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0326ZHOU C L, WANG C Y, GONG J, et al. Hybrid polarization anti-SMSP jamming based on jamming reconstruction and blind source separation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(9): 1841-1848(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0326 [14] LI X, WANG C Y, YUAN H, et al. Smeared spectrum jamming suppression based on time unit analysis and polarization cancellation[J]. Cluster Computing, 2019, 22(6): 14367-14375. [15] HOLLAND J H. Genetic algorithms and the optimal allocation of trials[J]. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1973, 2(2): 88-105. doi: 10.1137/0202009 [16] YANG W, CAI L L, WU F. Image segmentation based on gray level and local relative entropy two dimensional histogram[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0229651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229651 [17] STOCKWELL R G, MANSINHA L, LOWE R P. Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1996, 44(4): 998-1001. doi: 10.1109/78.492555 [18] 姬战怀, 严胜刚. 关于"一种改进广义S变换"的讨论[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(6): 1224-1230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ201506032.htmJI Z H, YAN S G. Discussion on 'An improved generalized S transform'[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(6): 1224-1230(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ201506032.htm [19] 鱼滨, 张善文, 郭竟. 基于MATLAB和遗传算法的图像处理[M]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2015: 181-184.YU B, ZHANG S W, GUO J. Image processing based on MATLAB and genetic algorithm[M]. Xi 'an: Xidian University Press, 2015: 181-184(in Chinese). [20] 李欣, 王春阳, 原慧, 等. 基于干扰重构和峭度最大化的SMSP干扰抑制方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(6): 1176-1184. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0421LI X, WANG C Y, YUAN H, et al. SMSP jamming suppression method based on jamming reconstruction and kurtosis maximum[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(6): 1176-1184(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0421