Differential game guidance law design for integration of penetration and strike of multiple flight vehicles
-
摘要:
针对多进攻弹突防弹群拦截再打击目标的交战场景,提出了一种可应用于对手信息不完全情况下的微分对策制导方法。建立多飞行器交战的线性化模型,并依据不同对抗组进行模型降阶。引入时间算子统一所有分组的终端时间,基于二人零和微分理论给出制导律。利用扩展卡尔曼滤波(EKF)实现对拦截弹和目标的状态估计,并将估计应用于所提制导律。在对手状态信息已知时,仿真突防脱靶量大于5 m,拦截脱靶量小于0.1 m。而在只给定粗糙有噪声观测的不完全信息下,滤波器对拦截弹与目标的状态估计误差可接受,仿真结果依然保持相近的脱靶精度。仿真结果表明,所提制导律能有效导引进攻弹规避拦截,并准确打击目标。
Abstract:To solve the problem of dodging the defense missile group and hitting the target, a differential game guidance law which can be applied under the condition of incomplete enemy information is proposed. The linearized model of multi-vehicle engagement was established and the order of the model was reduced according to different combat teams. A time operator is introduced to unify the terminal time of all teams, and thus the guidance law was deducted based on two-person zero-sum differential game theory. The state estimation of interceptors and target was applied to the proposed guidance law by employing the extended Kalman filter (EKF). The penetration miss distance is greater than 5 m assuming complete hostile state information, and the interception miss distance is less than 0.1 m. Given only the rough and noisy observations, to be a contrast, the state estimation error of interceptors and target is well acceptable, and similar miss distance accuracy can be achieved. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed guidance law can effectively guide attacking missiles to evade interception and hit the target accurately.
-
表 1 飞行器仿真参数
Table 1. Simulation parameters of flight vehicle
飞行器 (x0, y0)/m γ0/(°) V/(m·s-1) amax/g τ/s Mi (3000, 100+100i) 180 300 15 0.1 Dj (250+250j, 0) 10j-10 400 12 0.1 T (0, 600) 0 100 0.5 0.2 表 2 制导律参数
Table 2. Guidance law parameters
参数 数值 RMDmin/m 500 αMT 1 αMD1 10 000 αMD2 10 000 表 3 完全信息下的脱靶量
Table 3. Miss distance under complete information
工况 MissM-T/(10-6m) MissM-D1/m MissM-D2/m 单弹拦截(NDG) 4.258 3 5.002 4 单弹拦截(本文) 2.351 1 5.353 5 双弹拦截(本文) 1.084 8 13.426 2 5.667 4 表 4 多弹交战的脱靶量
Table 4. Miss distance of multi-missile engagement
工况 MissM-T/(10-6m) MissM-D1/m MissM-D2/m M1 2.961 2 13.166 2 110.679 4 M2 1.280 4 171.138 7 5.149 7 表 5 EKF与仿真参数
Table 5. Parameters of EKF and simulation
参数 数值 一阶延迟系数估计[τD1*, τD2*, τT*] [10,10,10] 系统过程噪声标准差[σD1, σD2] 3g 系统过程噪声标准差σT 0.3g 量测标准差[σM1D1ρ, σM1D2ρ, σM1D3ρ] 0.01[ρM1D1, ρM1D2, ρM1D3] 量测标准差[σM1D1λ, σM1D2λ, σM1D3λ] 0.002 rad D1, D2, T初始状态估计误差 [50 m, 50 m, 0.01 rad, 10 m/s] 表 6 不完全信息下的脱靶量
Table 6. Miss distance under incomplete information
工况 MissM-T/(10-6 m) MissM-D1/m MissM-D2/m 双弹拦截 0.018 46 12.312 5 5.732 8 -
[1] 郑玉航, 于海燕, 孙鹏. 导弹突防策略与措施研究[J]. 国防技术基础, 2002(5): 46-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJC200205016.htmZHENG Y H, YU H Y, SUN P. Study on missile penetration strategies and measures[J]. Technology Foundation of National Defence, 2002(5): 46-48(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GFJC200205016.htm [2] SHAFERMAN V, SHIMA T. Linear quadratic guidance laws for imposing a terminal intercept angle[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, 31(5): 1400-1412. doi: 10.2514/1.32836 [3] LIU Y, QI N, TANG Z. Linear quadratic differential game strategies with two-pursuit versus single-evader[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(6): 896-905. doi: 10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60460-3 [4] 王亚帆, 周韬, 陈万春, 等. 基于脱靶量级数解的最优机动突防策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(1): 159-169. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0135WANG Y F, ZHOU T, CHEN W C, et al. Optimal maneuver penetration strategy based on power series solution of miss distance[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(1): 159-169(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0135 [5] SHAFERMAN V, SHIMA T. Cooperative differential games guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(10): 2465-2480. doi: 10.2514/1.G002594 [6] 鲜勇, 田海鹏, 王剑, 等. 基于微分对策的导弹智能机动突防研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2014, 32(1): 70-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0853.2014.01.016XIAN Y, TIAN H P, WANG J, et al. Research on missile intelligent maneuver penetration based on differential game[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2014, 32(1): 70-73(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0853.2014.01.016 [7] 花文华, 张拥军, 张金鹏, 等. 双导弹拦截角度协同的微分对策制导律[J]. 中国惯性技术学报, 2016, 24(6): 838-844. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXJ201606025.htmHUA W H, ZHANG Y J, ZHANG J P, et al. Differential game guidance law for dual missile interception angle coordination[J]. Chinese Journal of Inertial Technology, 2016, 24(6): 838-844(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXJ201606025.htm [8] 郭志强, 周绍磊, 于运治. 拦截机动目标的范数型协同微分对策制导律[J]. 计算机仿真, 2020, 37(3): 23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2020.03.007GUO Z Q, ZHOU S L, YU Y Z. Guidance law of norm cooperative differential game for intercepting maneuvering targets[J]. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37(3): 23-26(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2020.03.007 [9] ZHURBAL A, IDAN M. Effect of estimation on the performance of an integrated missile guidance and control system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2011, 47(4): 2690-2708. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2011.6034659 [10] 姜易阳, 陈万春. 基于DGL/IMM算法的随机机动弹头拦截研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2012, 32(2): 6-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2012.02.002JIANG Y Y, CHEN W C. Research on interception of random maneuvering warhead based on DGL/IMM algorithm[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2012, 32(2): 6-10(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2012.02.002 [11] SHAFERMAN V, OSHMAN Y. Stochastic cooperative interception using information sharing based on engagement staggering[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(9): 2127-2141. doi: 10.2514/1.G000437 [12] OSHMAN Y, SHINAR J, WEIZMAN S A. Using a multiple-model adaptive estimator in a random evasion missile/aircraft encounter[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(6): 1176-1186. doi: 10.2514/2.4833 [13] FONOD R, SHIMA T. Multiple model adaptive evasion against a homing missile[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 39(7): 1578-1592. doi: 10.2514/1.G000404 [14] REISNER D, SHIMA T. Optimal guidance-to-collision law for an accelerating exoatmospheric interceptor missile[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(6): 1695-1708. doi: 10.2514/1.61258 [15] PAN S, SU H, CHU J, et al. Applying a novel extended Kalman filter to missile-target interception with APN guidance law: A benchmark case study[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2010, 18(2): 159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.09.010 [16] 刘磊, 高文冀, 王建超. 基于高斯伪谱法的制导火箭弹协同末制导分析[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2020(3): 81-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDYH202003016.htmLIU L, GAO W J, WANG J C. Cooperative terminal guidance analysis of guided rocket based on Gaussian pseudospectral method[J]. Missile and Space Delivery Technology, 2020(3): 81-85(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDYH202003016.htm [17] 肖惟, 于江龙, 董希旺, 等. 过载约束下的大机动目标协同拦截[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S1): 184-194. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB2020S1019.htmXIAO W, YU J L, DONG X W, et al. Cooperative interception of large maneuvering targets under overload constraint[J]. Acta Aeronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(S1): 184-194(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB2020S1019.htm [18] ZHOU H, RAHMAN T, CHEN W. Impact angle and impact velocity constrained terminal guidance for stationary target[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2015, 87(5): 454-464. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-09-2013-0164 [19] ZHOU H, CHENG T, LIU X, et al. Three-dimensional geometric descent guidance with impact angle constraint[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 64932-64948. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984353 [20] 郭志强, 孙启龙, 周绍磊, 等. 主动防御飞行器的范数型微分对策制导律[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(9): 1787-1796. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0738GUO Z Q, SUN Q L, ZHOU S L, et al. Norm differential game guidance law for active defense aircraft[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(9): 1787-1796(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2018.0738 [21] 王小平, 周问, 刘博. 三体对抗策略的预警机主动防御最优协同制导算法[J]. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 21(2): 16-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3516.2020.02.002WANG X P, ZHOU W, LIU B. Optimal cooperative guidance algorithm for early warning aircraft active defense based on three body confrontation strategy[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Editon), 2020, 21(2): 16-23(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3516.2020.02.002 [22] 杜宗霖, 王晓芳, 贺敏, 等. 考虑目标安全性的最优协同拦截制导律研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2020, 38(1): 73-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FHLX202001012.htmDU Z L, WANG X F, HE M, et al. Research on optimal cooperative interception guidance law considering target safety[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2020, 38(1): 73-79(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FHLX202001012.htm [23] SHIMA T. Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion srategies against a homing missile[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34(2): 414-425. doi: 10.2514/1.51765 [24] KUMAR S R, SHIMA T. Cooperative nonlinear guidance strategies for aircraft defense[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(1): 124-138. doi: 10.2514/1.G000659 [25] FONOD R, SHIMA T. Estimation enhancement by cooperatively imposing relative intercept angles[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(7): 1711-1725. doi: 10.2514/1.G002379