北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 15-21.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0316

• 公共政策与治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

协商质量的指标化——商谈测量工具综述

黄峥   

  1. 吉林大学 行政学院, 吉林 长春 130012
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-11 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-03-24
  • 作者简介:黄峥(1985-),男,浙江宁波人,博士研究生,研究方向为规范政治理论及其经验转向.
  • 基金资助:

    2011年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(11JZD030);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2013ZZ025)

Indexing the Deliberative Quality:Review on the Methods for Discourse Measurement

Huang Zheng   

  1. College of Public Administration, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
  • Received:2013-07-11 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-03-24

摘要:

协商质量的指标化是协商质量的测量工具。斯蒂伯格基于哈贝马斯的商谈伦理设计了第一代商谈质量指标,该指标在“具体指标”“测量要素充分性”“适用性”以及“可靠性”等方面引起了各方的讨论,在此基础上,研究者又相继发展出了编码方案、主体间理性指标和第二代商谈质量指标。

关键词: 协商民主, 商谈质量指标, 商谈内容编码, 主体间理性指标, 第二代商谈质量指标

Abstract:

Indexization of deliberative quality is a method for deliberation measuring. Marco R Steenbergen and his fellows designed the Discourse Quality Index 1.0 based on Habermas-s discourse ethics, which aroused a lot of debates around the DQI1.0, including the doubt about the credibility of detail indexes, sufficiency, applicability and reliability of DQI1.0 in whole. As a result, researchers developed coding scheme for measuring deliberation-s content, intersubjective rationality index and DQI2.0 as a supplement for DQI1.0.

Key words: deliberative democracy, discourse quality index, discourse coding scheme, intersubjective rationality index, DQI2.0

中图分类号: