北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 32-36.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0584

• 航空法与外层空间法 • 上一篇    下一篇

两岸承运人航班延误的比较研究

李晓慧   

  1. 北京航空航天大学法学院, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-18 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-07-23
  • 作者简介:李晓慧(1986-),女,山东德州人,博士研究生,研究方向为航空法、国际法。

Comparative Study on Cross-strait Air Carrier Flight Delay

Li Xiaohui   

  1. Law School, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2013-12-18 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-07-23

摘要:

由于政治、经济和历史的差异,海峡两岸对承运人航班延误的规制既有相同之处,又有差异。通过比较分析发现,两岸的规范性法律文件存在问题,航班延误内涵模糊,承运人责任限额不明确,航空延误险存在立法空白,中国大陆地区承运人的免责事由过于宽泛,承运人的附随义务模糊。对此,应明确延误的认定标准和承运人的责任限额,增加航班延误险的规定,减少中国大陆地区承运人免责事由,规范中国大陆地区承运人的附随义务。

关键词: 航班延误, 责任限额, 免责事由, 航班延误险, 附随义务

Abstract:

Due to different political, economic and historical situations, the liability systems of the air carrier in Mainland China and Taiwan have similarities as well as differences. There exist some problems in the relative regulations of flight delay. The essence of flight delay and the liability limitation are not clear. There is no legislation on the insurance of flight delay. In Mainland China, the scope of the exemption excuse is too large to protect the benefit of passengers and the collateral duty is not explicit in the regulations. This paper gives suggestions on the standard of flight delay, liability limitation of the air carrier and insurance on flight delay of Mainland China and Taiwan. It is suggested that the exemption excuses should be reduced and the collateral duty of air carrier be elaborated in Mainland China.

Key words: flight delay, liability limitation, exemption excuses, insurance on flight delay, collateral duty

中图分类号: