ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
李晓慧. 两岸承运人航班延误的比较研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(4): 32-36. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0584
引用本文: 李晓慧. 两岸承运人航班延误的比较研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(4): 32-36. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0584
Li Xiaohui. Comparative Study on Cross-strait Air Carrier Flight Delay[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(4): 32-36. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0584
Citation: Li Xiaohui. Comparative Study on Cross-strait Air Carrier Flight Delay[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(4): 32-36. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0584

两岸承运人航班延误的比较研究

Comparative Study on Cross-strait Air Carrier Flight Delay

  • 摘要: 由于政治、经济和历史的差异,海峡两岸对承运人航班延误的规制既有相同之处,又有差异。通过比较分析发现,两岸的规范性法律文件存在问题,航班延误内涵模糊,承运人责任限额不明确,航空延误险存在立法空白,中国大陆地区承运人的免责事由过于宽泛,承运人的附随义务模糊。对此,应明确延误的认定标准和承运人的责任限额,增加航班延误险的规定,减少中国大陆地区承运人免责事由,规范中国大陆地区承运人的附随义务。

     

    Abstract: Due to different political, economic and historical situations, the liability systems of the air carrier in Mainland China and Taiwan have similarities as well as differences. There exist some problems in the relative regulations of flight delay. The essence of flight delay and the liability limitation are not clear. There is no legislation on the insurance of flight delay. In Mainland China, the scope of the exemption excuse is too large to protect the benefit of passengers and the collateral duty is not explicit in the regulations. This paper gives suggestions on the standard of flight delay, liability limitation of the air carrier and insurance on flight delay of Mainland China and Taiwan. It is suggested that the exemption excuses should be reduced and the collateral duty of air carrier be elaborated in Mainland China.

     

/

返回文章
返回