ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
亚当·汤姆金斯. 政治宪法留下了什么? [J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(3): 44-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0133
引用本文: 亚当·汤姆金斯. 政治宪法留下了什么? [J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(3): 44-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0133
Adam Tomkins. What’s Left of the Political Constitution?[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(3): 44-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0133
Citation: Adam Tomkins. What’s Left of the Political Constitution?[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(3): 44-52. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0133

政治宪法留下了什么?

What’s Left of the Political Constitution?

  • 摘要: 英国的政治宪法学应当从关于政治宪法和法律宪法之间已显过时的对比中继续前进。将联合王国宪法作为焦点,分析作为政治与法律混合体系的当代宪治秩序,发现这样一种混合体系无论是相对于政治宪法模式还是相对于法律宪法模式,都可能是一种更有说服力和吸引力的体系。

     

    Abstract: This paper argues that we should move on from what has become a rather outdated contrast between the political constitution and the legal constitution. Taking as its focus the constitution of the United Kingdom, the paper analyzes the contemporary constitutional order as a mixed system of politics and law combined. It argues that such a mix may be a more compelling and attractive system than either the model of the political constitution or that of the legal constitution.

     

/

返回文章
返回