北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 25-31.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0134

• 本期特约专家稿件 • 上一篇    下一篇

韩亚航空事故承运人责任的管辖权探讨

于丹   

  1. 华东政法大学国际航运法律学院, 上海 200042
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-03 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-07-23
  • 作者简介:于丹(1977-),女,辽宁沈阳人,副教授,博士,研究方向为国际航空法。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CFX118)

On Jurisdiction of Carrier’s Liability in Asiana Air Accident

Yu Dan   

  1. School of International Shipping Law, East University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
  • Received:2014-04-03 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-07-23

摘要:

1999年《蒙特利尔公约》为国际航空运输中承运人责任的确定提供了统一的实体法规则。公约确定了5种管辖权,如何在其中做出选择不仅关系着诉讼能否顺利展开,也可能对最终的诉讼结果具有重要的影响。结合韩亚航空事故的具体情况,对旅客一方可援引的5种《蒙特利尔公约》管辖权进行逐一分析,指出死伤的中国旅客将很难依据公约在美国提起诉讼。

关键词: 国际航空运输, 承运人责任, 管辖权, 韩亚航空事故, 赔偿范围

Abstract:

The Montreal Convention of 1999 (MC) provides a set of uniform legal rules for carrier's liability in international air carriage. MC also stipulates five kinds of jurisdiction choice for plaintiffs and the determination of jurisdiction is one of most important factors in litigation since it always has influence on the litigation result. From the perspective of Asiana victims, a comparative analysis is made on jurisdiction rules of MC, and the conclusion is that there is little possibility for Chinese passengers to sue Asiana Airlines in the territory of US.

Key words: international carriage by air, carrier’s liability, jurisdiction, Asiana air accident, scope of compensation

中图分类号: