ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
李静波. 作格在类型和形式学派中的概念内涵差异[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2016, 29(4): 93-97. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0663
引用本文: 李静波. 作格在类型和形式学派中的概念内涵差异[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2016, 29(4): 93-97. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0663
LI Jingbo. Differences of Ergative between Linguistic Typology and Formal Linguistics[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 29(4): 93-97. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0663
Citation: LI Jingbo. Differences of Ergative between Linguistic Typology and Formal Linguistics[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 29(4): 93-97. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2014.0663

作格在类型和形式学派中的概念内涵差异

Differences of Ergative between Linguistic Typology and Formal Linguistics

  • 摘要: 作格是语言学的一个重要概念,但由于不同流派或者同一流派的不同学者对作格有不同的理解,导致了术语混乱。通过对类型学派和形式学派中的作格以及作格语言、作格性、作格动词、非宾格动词等概念的系统梳理和分析,明确其在各自学派中的内涵,进而对比了两个学派对这些概念的不同理解和研究侧重点。研究表明,类型学派和形式学派中的作格概念并无太多的相关性,惟一的共通之处是都使用S=P≠A这一原则确定作格性(非宾格性),但是适用的范围却不相同。中国国内学者对非宾格动词和作格动词的理解也不一致,相互间的讨论往往不在同一理论体系中。

     

    Abstract: Ergative is a key notion in linguistics whose usage varies among scholars and schools. This paper discusses the connotations of ergative, ergative language, ergativity, ergative verb, unaccusative verb, etc. And then further compares their different understandings and major concerns in linguistic typology and formal linguistics. It shows that the terms used in the two schools are not much corelated. The only point in common is that they both use the rule of S=P≠A to define ergativity, but are different in scope. Chinese linguists do not agree on the use of terms either. Discussions are often not carried out in the same theoretical framework.

     

/

返回文章
返回