北京航空航天大学学报社科版 ›› 2021, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 88-95.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0052

• 公共政策与治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

APEC科技创新合作中的联盟冲突与政策学习——基于倡议联盟框架理论

徐治立1, 王希1, 霍宇同1, 王再进2   

  1. 1. 北京航空航天大学 人文社会科学学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 科技部科技评估中心 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2021-06-08
  • 作者简介:徐治立(1962-),男,河南商城人,教授,博士,研究方向为科技政治哲学、科技政策与管理.
  • 基金资助:
    科技部科技评估中心委托研究课题(ZLY20162501)

Coalition Conflict and Policy Learning of APEC Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation: Analysis Based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework

XU Zhili1, WANG Xi1, HUO Yutong1, WANG Zaijin2   

  1. 1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-02-20 Published:2021-06-08

摘要: APEC科技创新合作对于推动亚太经济社会可持续均衡发展具有重大意义。根据倡议联盟框架理论,认为APEC成员由于不同的信念体系构成三类倡议联盟,并存在联盟冲突,进而导致APEC科技创新合作进展缓慢。政策学习是化解联盟冲突的重要途径。基于冲突程度、问题可分析性、专业论坛三个方面进行分析,发现当前APEC科技创新合作中联盟政策学习的可能性不足,进而从明确信念、义利兼顾、增进沟通三方面进行建议以促进联盟政策学习、提升合作成效。

关键词: APEC, 科技创新合作, 倡议联盟框架, 联盟冲突, 政策学习

Abstract: APEC Science and Technology Innovation (STI) cooperation is of great significance to the sustainable and balanced development of economy society in APEC area. Based on the "Advocacy Coalition Framework", this paper maintains that APEC members constitute three kinds of advocacy coalitions with different belief systems, and the coalition conflicts result in tardy progress in APEC STI cooperation. Policy learning is an important way to solve coalition conflicts. Analysis in three aspects of conflict degree, problem analyzability and professional forum shows that the possibility of coalition policy learning in APEC STI cooperation is insufficient. Suggestions including clear policy belief, increasing analyzability, and enhancing communication are proposed to promote coalition policy learning, so as to improve the result of APEC STI cooperation.

Key words: APEC, STI cooperation, Advocacy Coalition Framework, coalition conflict, policy learning

中图分类号: