北京航空航天大学学报社科版 ›› 2021, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 127-133.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0324

• 航空法与外层空间法 • 上一篇    下一篇

空域的概念刍议

张卫彬, 江昊   

  1. 安徽财经大学 法学院, 安徽 蚌埠 233000
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-02 发布日期:2021-06-08
  • 作者简介:张卫彬(1975-),男,安徽蚌埠人,教授,博士,研究方向为国际公法.
  • 基金资助:
    安徽财经大学研究生科研创新项目(ACYC2019383,ACYC2020457)

Discussion on the Concept of Airspace

ZHANG Weibin, JIANG Hao   

  1. School of Law, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu Anhui 233000, China
  • Received:2020-07-02 Published:2021-06-08

摘要: 低空无人机公共航路构建及外层空间航天活动的发展,对当前航空航天法的建设提出了诸多挑战。但现行法律未能明确空域概念的具体内涵,并且当前学界研究中存在混淆空域、领空及空气空间等概念的现象,这些因素在客观上迟滞了航空航天法学的发展。因此,首先,应由空域权利的相关主体出发,以空域权利主体的利益诉求为界定视角;其次,应分别辨析空气空间说缺陷、空域与领空的关系等学界研究中存在的概念混淆问题,进而对空域概念的具体内涵加以明确。

关键词: 航空航天法, 空域的概念, 空气空间说, 领空

Abstract: The application of near ground UAV and the development of outer space activities pose many challenges to the construction of aerospace law. However, the current law does not clearly define the specific connotation of the concept of airspace, and the current academic research also confuses the concept of airspace, territorial airspace and air space, which objectively delays the development of aerospace law. Therefore, first of all, we should start from the perspective of the subject of airspace rights by taking the interest demands of the subject of airspace rights as the definition perspective; secondly, we should distinguish the defects of air space theory, the relationship between airspace and territorial airspace, and then clarify the specific connotation of airspace concept.

Key words: aerospace law, concept of airspace, air space theory, territorial airspace

中图分类号: