北京航空航天大学学报社科版 ›› 2021, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 58-64.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0063

• 公共政策与治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

论对监察委员会的监督与制约

吴国斌, 沈思雨   

  1. 北京体育大学 马克思主义学院, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-01 发布日期:2021-06-08
  • 作者简介:吴国斌(1981-),男,湖北武汉人,讲师,博士,研究方向为廉政建设、执政党建设.
  • 基金资助:
    北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心暨北京市社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDL30)

On the Supervision and Restriction of the Supervisory Committee

WU Guobin, SHEN Siyu   

  1. School of Marxism, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2021-03-01 Published:2021-06-08

摘要: 对监察委员会的监督制约是监察体制改革顶层设计的重要内容。监察委员会的地位和作用、监察权的性质和功能要求加强对监察委员会及其工作人员的监督制约。国(境)外反腐败成功的廉政机构的有效经验也表明要加强对反腐败机构监督制约。对监察委员会进行监督,在内部,可以采取组织分设、相互监督和内部制度设计等方式进行;在外部,可以开展新闻舆论、社会群众的监督。对监察委员会进行制约,内部要建立请示报告和审批程序、集体决策、业务流程三个方面的制约制度。在腐败案件处理和政治架构中其他国家政权机关可以对监察委员会形成制约。

关键词: 监察委员会, 内部监督, 外部监督, 监督方式, “三权分置”

Abstract: The supervision and restriction of the supervisory committee is an important part of the top-level design of the supervision system reform. The status and role of the supervisory committee and the nature and function of the supervisory power call for strengthening the supervision and control of the supervisory committee and its staff. The effective experience of successful anti-corruption agencies both home and abroad shows that it is necessary to strengthen the supervision and control of anti-corruption institutions. The supervision of the supervisory committee can be internally carried out by means of organizational division, mutual supervision and internal system design, and externally by means of the news and the masses. To restrict the supervisory committee, the internal control system should be established in three aspects:reporting for instructions and approval procedures, collective decision-making and business processes. In dealing with corruption cases and political framework, other state power organs can restrict the supervisory committee.

Key words: the supervisory committee, internal supervision, external supervision, supervision mode, “three powers separated”

中图分类号: