论中国航空器权利体系:现状、问题与完善

doi:10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1181

北京航空航天大学学报社科版 ›› 2022, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 158-165.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.1181

论中国航空器权利体系:现状、问题与完善

李大朋

中国政法大学国际法学院, 北京 100088

收稿日期:2021-12-29 发布日期:2022-05-31
作者简介:李大朋(1989-),男,安徽定远人,讲师,博士,研究方向为航空法.
基金资助:
中国政法大学科研创新项目（21ZFG82008）

Status Quo, Problem and Development of Property Rights of Aircraft in Chinese Law

LI Dapeng

School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Received:2021-12-29 Published:2022-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 航空器权利作为特殊物权，参考了航空器权利国际条约，而国际条约又深受英美财产法影响，因此具有很深的英美财产法烙印。《中华人民共和国民用航空法》早于《中华人民共和国物权法》颁布，部分借鉴《日内瓦公约》，仍然存在不完善之处，无法完全满足航空器融资交易与跨境交易的需求。所以，应当对中国民用航空器权利体系进行全面现代化升级，将"买受人要求获得航空器权利"这一权利内涵纳入航空器权利，并对航空器担保权人提供更全面的保护。

关键词: 航空器权利, 《日内瓦公约》, 《开普敦公约》, 要求获得航空器的权利, 航空器抵押权

Abstract: As special rights in rem, aircraft rights refer to international treaties on aircraft rights, which are deeply influenced by Anglo-American property law, and has a deep brand of Anglo-American property law. Promulgated prior to the Property Law of the People's Republic of China, Civil Aviation Law of the People's Republic of China still has imperfections, and cannot fully meet the needs of aircraft financing transactions and cross-border transactions. Therefore, there is urgent need for the comprehensive modernization and upgrading of China's civil aircraft rights system with the connotation of "the buyer's claim of the right to acquire aircraft" being incorporated into aircraft rights, so that more comprehensive protection can be provided to the secured party of aircraft.

Key words: aircraft right, Geneva Convention, Cape Town Convention, claim of the right to acquire aircraft, aircraft mortgage

中图分类号:

D925

李大朋. 论中国航空器权利体系:现状、问题与完善[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社科版, 2022, 35(3): 158-165.

LI Dapeng. Status Quo, Problem and Development of Property Rights of Aircraft in Chinese Law[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(3): 158-165.

参考文献

[1] 杜新丽,宣增益.国际私法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017:13.
[2] 宗苏宁.中国通用航空产业发展现实与思考[M].北京:航空工业出版社,2014:130-131.
[3] BUNKER D H. International aircraft financing[M]. Montreal:International Air Transport Association, 2005:130-131.
[4] SAUNDERS A, WALTER I. Economic impact assessment of proposed unidroit convention on international interests in mobile equipment as applicable to aircraft equipment through the aircraft equipment protocol[EB/OL].(2017-05-18)[2021-11-31].https://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2000/study72j/s-72j-02-e.pdf.
[5] HAVEL B F, SANCHEZ G S. The principles and practice of international aviation law[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014:326.
[6] GOODE R, KRONKE H, MCKENDRICK E, et al. Transnational commercial law:International instruments and commentary[M]. 2nd ed. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2012:468.
[7] 陈华彬.民法物权论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2010:521.
[8] 罗伊·古德.国际航空器融资法律实物——移动设备国际利益公约及航空器设备特定问题议定书正式评述[M].高圣平,译.北京:法律出版社,2014:7-8.
[9] 茆少华,孙少君.所有权保留纠纷审判实务研究[J].法学,2005(1):121-128.
[10] 申卫星.所有权保留买卖买受人期待权之本质[J].法学研究,2003(2):46-61.
[11] ERP S V, AKKERMANS B. Cases materials and text on property law[M]. Oxford:Hart Publishing, 2012:162.
[12] 孟繁超,朱彤彤.民用航空器物权体系建构若干问题研究[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,32(1):38-42.
[13] 程卫东.国际融资租赁法律问题研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:148-149.
[14] SCHEINBERG R. The Commercial Aircraft Finance Handbook[M]. London:Euromoney Books, 2014:160.
[15] 王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:166.
[16] BRIDGE M. Personal property law[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2015:281.
[17] MADSEN R E. Equitable considerations of mortgage foreclosure and redemption in Utah:A need for remedial legislation[J]. Utah Law Review,1976:327-356.
[18] 何美欢.香港担保法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1996:181.
[19] GOODE R. Legal problems of credit and security[M]. 3rd ed. London:Sweet & Maxwell, 2003:17.
[20] 宰丝雨.美国动产担保交易制度与判例——基于美国《统一商法典》第九篇动产担保法[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:15-17.
[21] CUMING C R. Basic issues identified in responses to the questionnaire on an international regulation of aspects of security interests in mobile equipment[EB/OL]. (2017-05-18)[2021-02-15]. https://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study72/s-72-04-e.pdf.

论中国航空器权利体系:现状、问题与完善

Status Quo, Problem and Development of Property Rights of Aircraft in Chinese Law

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李亚凝. 民用航空发动机权利登记制度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社科版, 2022, 35(3): 166-176.
[2]	郑派. 论《开普敦公约》项下的空间资产概念[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 28(2): 49-54.