ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
陈小君, 周崇聪. 集体经济组织作为集体土地所有权主体之考量[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2022, 35(5): 67-76. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0530
引用本文: 陈小君, 周崇聪. 集体经济组织作为集体土地所有权主体之考量[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2022, 35(5): 67-76. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0530
CHEN Xiaojun, ZHOU Chongcong. Consideration of the Collective Economic Organizations as the Subject of Collective Land Ownership[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(5): 67-76. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0530
Citation: CHEN Xiaojun, ZHOU Chongcong. Consideration of the Collective Economic Organizations as the Subject of Collective Land Ownership[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(5): 67-76. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0530

集体经济组织作为集体土地所有权主体之考量

Consideration of the Collective Economic Organizations as the Subject of Collective Land Ownership

  • 摘要: 集体经济组织作为集体土地所有权主体之制度, 在历史演进和法规范中, 经历了从明确到模糊的变化。明晰的农村集体土地所有权主体制度能够保障集体经济有效运行, 但集体土地所有权主体虚位阻碍了集体经济的发展, 表现为集体经济组织代表行使土地所有权的规则运行之漏洞、集体经济组织与农民集体关系表达逻辑的不周延等问题。集体经济组织作为集体土地所有权主体, 是历史理性和规范理性的回归。一方面, 集体经济组织需要以集体土地作为资产构成以符合法人的成立条件, 并能够通过法人的特别责任规避集体土地资产的流失; 另一方面, 集体经济组织作为其成员权益的主体依托, 才能最终实现成员土地用益、收益分配、权利救济和意思表达等权益。

     

    Abstract: The system of collective economic organizations as the subject of collective land ownership has experienced the change from clarity to ambiguity in the historical evolution and the normalization of laws and regulations. An explicit subject system of rural collective land ownership can ensure the effective operation of the collective economy, but the nullity of subject hinders the development of the collective economy, which is manifested in the loopholes in the operation of the rules for the representatives of collective economic organizations to exercise land ownership, as well as in the lack of logic in the expression of the relationship between collective economic organizations and peasant collectives. As the subject of collective land ownership, collective economic organizations get back to historical and normative rationality. On the one hand, collective economic organizations need to take collective land as assets to meet the conditions for the establishment of legal persons, and avoid the loss of collective land assets through the special responsibility of legal persons. On the other hand, only when the collective economic organizations serve as the main support of their members' rights and interests can they finally realize their members' rights and interests, such as land use, income distribution, right relief, and expression of the will.

     

/

返回文章
返回