试论外空《责任公约》及其完善

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

1972年责任公约是国际政策、国际关系和国际经济相互作用的产物。该公约有助于空间物体损害责任的确定。但随着越来越多的空间活动的开展以及外空商业化的进程,该公约的适用受到了严峻的挑战。因此,在该公约存在30多年之后,有必要对其进行认真的探讨,研究是否需要对之改进, 以适应外空活动的新发展。

关键词: 责任, 损害, 商业化, 国际空间站

Abstract:

The 1972 Liability Convention is an example of the interaction of inte rnational policy, international relations and economy. It helps define liability for damages caused by space objects. However, with more and more space activiti es taking place on a daily basis, along with the trend of commercialization, sev ere challenges have set on the continual application of the Convention. Conseque ntly, a new round of serious review of the Convention is indispensable after mor e than 30 years of its existence. The Convention with possible revision would of fer a clear guideline for decision-makers to decide cases in a rational way bes t suited to the development of space operations.

Key words: liability, damage, commercialization, international space station

中图分类号:

DF991

赵云. 试论外空《责任公约》及其完善[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2008, 21(1): 43-47.

ZHAO Yun. On the Liability Convention for Outer Space and Its Consummation[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2008, 21(1): 43-47.

参考文献

[1] Zhukov G, Kolosov Y. International Space Law [M]. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1984. 101. 
[2] Firestone M S. Problems in the Resolution of Disputes Concerning Dama ge Caused in Outer Space [J]. Tulane Law Review, 1985, 59. 
[3] Zullo K M. The Need to Clarify the Status of Property Rights in Inter national Space Law [J]. Georgetown Law Journal, 2002, 90:2413-2444. 
[4] Wassenbergh H A. A Launch and A Space Transportation Law, Separate fr om Outer Space Law [J]. Air & Space Law, 1996, 21:28. 
[5] Bockstiegel K H. Commercial Use of Space Stations-The Legal Framewor k of Transatlantic Cooperation [M]. Kolu: Heymanns, 1986. 217-222. 
[6] Lee R J. Reconciling International Space Law with the Commercial Real ities of the Twenty-First Century [J]. Singapore Journal of International & C omparative Law, 2000. 
[7] Larsen P B. Future Protocol on Security Interests in Space Assets . Journal of Air Law & Commerce, 2002, 67:1091-1092. 
[8] Moenter R. The International Space Station: Legal Framework and Curre nt Status [J]. Journal of Air Law & Commerce, 1999, 64:1051-1052. 
[9] Lafferanderie G, Crowther D. Outlook on Space Law over the Next 30 Ye ars [M]. The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1997. 179-182. 
[10] Wassenbergh H A. International Space Law: A Turn of the Tide [J]. Air & Space Law, 1997, 22: 334. 
[11] Manzione L L. Multinational Investment in the Space Station: An Oute r Space Model for International Cooperation[J]. American University Internati onal Law Review, 2002, 18: 519-520. 
[12] Mosteshar S. Research and Invention in Outer Space, Liability and Pr operty Rights [M]. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995. 95-110. 
[13] International Institute of Space Law. Proceedings 37th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space [M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Ast ronautics, 1994. 77-83. 
[14] Cheng B. Article VI of the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: "Internatio nal Responsibility", "National Activity" and "The Appropriate State" [J]. Journal of Space Law, 1998, 26: 7-32. 
[15] Ph I H. Diederiks-Verschoor. An Introduction to Space Law [M]. Th e Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999. 
[16] Kerrest A. Launching Spacecraft from the Sea and Outer Space Treaty: the Sea Launch Project[J]. Air & Space Law, 1998, 23: 16-21. 
[17] Nagel K F. Das neue Regierun sab kommenuber die Internationale Raum Station [J]. Zeit Schrift fur Luft-und Weltraumrecht (ZLW),2002, 47:149-163. 
[18] Petras C M. "Space Force Alpha": Military Use of the International Space Station and the Concept of "Peaceful Purposes"[J]. Air Force Law Rev iew,2002, 53: 165-166. 
[19] Nesgos P D. The Challenges Facing the Private Practitioner: Liabilit y and Insurance Issues in Commercial Space Transportation [J]. Georgetown Univ ersity Law Review, 1989, 4: 24. 
[20] Devlin M C, Schmidt W G. Legal Issues Continue to Surround the Inter national Space Station [J]. USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 1997,8: 248. 
[21] Watson A D, Schmidt W G. Legal Issues Surrounding the International Space Station [J]. USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 1996, 7: 172. 
[22] Reis. Some Reflections on the Liability Convention for Outer Space [J]. Journal of Space Law, 1978, 6: 127. 
[23] Gorove S. Studies in Space Law: Its Challenges and Prospects [M]. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1977. 105. 
[24] Baker H A. Space Debris: Legal and Policy Implications [M]. Dordre cht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989. 62. 
[25] Jasentuliyana N, Lee R. Manual on Space Law [M]. Alphen aan den Ri jn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1981. 317. 
[26] Hurwitz B A. The Legality of Space Militarization [M]. Amsterdam/N ew York: North Holland, 1986. 40. 
[27] International Institute of Space Law. Proceedings of 21st Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space [M]. Reston: American Institute of aeronautics and Astronautics, 1978. 138. 
[28] Christol C Q. International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Obj ects [J]. American Journal of International Law, 1980, 74: 368. 
[29] Twibell T S. Space Law: Legal Restraints on Commercialization and De velopment of Outer Space [J]. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review , 1997, 65: 596. 
[30] Fumarola C E. Stratospheric Recovery: Recent and Forthcoming Changes in International Air Disaster Law and Its Effect on Air Terrorism Recovery . Suffolk University Law Review, 2003, 36: 835-836. 
[31] International Institute of Space Law. Proceedings 4th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space [M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astr onautics, 1961. 329. 
[32] Van Traa-Engelman H L. Commercial Utilization of Outer Space-Legal Aspects [M]. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989. 35. 
[33] International Institute of Space Law. Proceedings 30th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space [M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Ast ronautics, 1987. 251-262.