ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
刘娜. 大学英语六级考试阅读理解试题内容效度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(2): 113-116. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0210
引用本文: 刘娜. 大学英语六级考试阅读理解试题内容效度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2014, 27(2): 113-116. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0210
Liu Na. Research on Content Validity of Reading Comprehension in CET-6[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(2): 113-116. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0210
Citation: Liu Na. Research on Content Validity of Reading Comprehension in CET-6[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2014, 27(2): 113-116. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2013.0210

大学英语六级考试阅读理解试题内容效度研究

Research on Content Validity of Reading Comprehension in CET-6

  • 摘要: 阅读理解是大学英语六级考试的重要组成部分,其信度和效度一直是人们关注的焦点。以大学英语六级考试真题为样本,从语言输入和预计输出角度研究了阅读理解的内容效度。结果表明,阅读理解试题的设计较好地符合了《大学英语教学大纲》和《大学英语六级考试大纲》的要求,对考生的阅读能力也有较好的考查,但还需进一步的改进和完善,使之有更好的效度。

     

    Abstract: Reading comprehension is an important part in CET-6, whose reliability and validity have become a focus for a long time. Taking new CET-6 exam questions as samples, the article attempts to analyze the content validity of the reading comprehension part in CET-6 from the prospective of text input and expected output. Results indicate that CET-6 reading comprehension conforms to the standards of CET-6 Testing Syllabus and tallies with the specifications of College English Syllabus. At the same time, it proves to be an effective test for the reading ability of the examinees. Even so, it still needs to be improved so as to obtain a better validity.

     

/

返回文章
返回