立法机构“回归”社会:国外议会的探索及启示

doi:10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0154

北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 30-37.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0154

立法机构“回归”社会:国外议会的探索及启示

严行健

华东政法大学政治学研究院, 上海 201620

收稿日期:2019-05-13 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-09-06
作者简介:严行健(1986-),男,江西南昌人,副教授,博士,研究方向为人民代表大会及各国立法机构.
基金资助:
华东政法大学科学研究项目（2018ZZX03）

On Re-Socialisation of Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis

YAN Xingjian

East China University of Political Science and Law, Institute of Political Science, Shanghai 201620, China

Received:2019-05-13 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-09-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

立法专业化、委员会化和互联网兴起等因素削弱了立法机构与社会的联系，这已成为包括人民代表大会在内的各国立法机构面临的共同挑战。在试图让立法机构重新"回归"社会方面，一些国家的议会尝试了设立议会媒体、向青少年提供教育资源以及巡展等方式，表明这些议会试图建立一种新型的"立法机构-社会"关系，而不是简单回归传统的"议员-选民"关系。这些案例除了为完善人大制度提供一些具体参考，也彰显出在加强人大代表同群众的联系之外，还应通过制度创新，增强人大制度本身的社会存在感、信任感和效能感。

关键词: 人民代表大会, 人大代表, 社会影响力, 比较研究

Abstract:

The growing professionalisation and committee domination of legislation, as well as the development of internet weaken the legislature-social linkage, making it a common threat to the legislatures worldwide, including China's People's Congress. In rebuilding the linkage, legislatures of many countries tried to establish legislative media, offer education service to young person, and engage in outreach activities. Those endeavours illustrate their attempt to set up a new "legislature-society" relationship, rather than the traditional "parliamentarian-voter" linkage. The cases examined in this paper offer new ideas to the development of the People's Congress. They also show the importance of enhancing Chinese legislature's social impact.

Key words: People's Congress, People's Congress deputy, social impact, comparative analysis

中图分类号:

D73.23

严行健. 立法机构“回归”社会:国外议会的探索及启示[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 32(4): 30-37.

YAN Xingjian. On Re-Socialisation of Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2019, 32(4): 30-37.

参考文献

[1] 孟天广,宁晶.互联网"去政治化"的政治后果——基于广义倾向值匹配的实证研究[J].探索,2018(3):63-76.
[2] 戴激涛. "开门立法"如何推进:商谈建制化是关键——广东省人大开门立法遇冷的再思考[J]. 人大研究, 2014(2):36-39.
[3] HAUGHEY S. Extra-Parliamentary Behaviour in Northern Ireland:MLAs and Constituency Service[J]. Journal of Legislative Studies, 2017, 23(4):529-548.
[4] BEETHAM D. Parliament and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century:A Guide to Good Practice[M]. Geneva:Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2006:70-72.
[5] FOX R. Parliaments and Public Engagement:Innovation and Good Practice around the World[M]. London:Hansard Society, 2011.
[6] Hansard Society. Audit of Political Engagement, 10th Report[M]. London:Hansard Society, 2013.
[7] PONET D. A Handbook on Child Participation in Parliament[M].Geneva:Inter-parliamentary union, 2011.
[8] PATRIKIOS S, SHEPHARD M. Representative and Useful? An Empirical Assessment of the Representative Nature and Impact of the Scottish Youth Parliament[J]. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 2014, 20(2):236-254.
[9] COWLEY P. Parliamentary Outreach:Proving Bismarck Wrong[EB/OL].[2018-10-15]. https://www.psa.ac.uk/insight-plus/blog/parliamentary-outreach-%E2%80%93-proving-bismarck-wrong.
[10] House of Lords Infomration Committee. Are the Lords Listening? Creating Connections between People and Parliament:First Report of Session 2008-09[M]. London:Stationery Office, 2009:10-11.
[11] WARD S, LUSOLI W. ‘From weird to wired’:MPs, the internet and representative politics in the UK[J]. Journal of Legislative Studies, 2005, 7(11):57-81.
[12] JACKSON N, DARREN L. Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management:UK MPs and the Use of Twitter[J]. Journal of Legislative Studies, 2011, 17(1):86-105.
[13] Hansard Society Commission on the Communication of Parliamentary Democracy. Members Only? Parliament in the Public Eye[M]. London:Hansard Society, 2005.
[14] 菲利普·诺顿. 英国议会政治[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2016:230.
[15] legislature broadcaster[EB/OL].[2018-12-11].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislature_broadcaster.
[16] Audit of Political Engagement 16(2019 Report)[EB/OL].[2019-5-23].https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/audit-of-political-engagement-16.
[17] MANSBRIDGE J. Rethinking Representation[J]. American Political Science Review, 2003, 97(4):515-528.
[18] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第二卷)[M].北京:外文出版社:285-286.

立法机构“回归”社会:国外议会的探索及启示

On Re-Socialisation of Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	齐磊, 唐权. 多案例文献荟萃分析法的提出及其研究思路[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 32(2): 139-145.
[2]	严行健. 地方人大代表直接联系群众工作的现状及特征[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 31(3): 47-54.
[3]	严行健. 人大代表民意回应度的计算机辅助测量[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 30(3): 9-16,54.
[4]	朱信号, 龚衍丽. 大陆与台湾地区普通高校军训教育比较研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2005, 18(4): 69-72.
[5]	方卫华. 社会政策比较研究的弱纲领与新趋势[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 16(S0): 9-14.
[6]	赵江涛, 黄薇, 王惠文. 两种成分数据预测建模方法的比较研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 16(2): 37-40.