ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
杨丽, 王晓宇, 孙新强. 权利冲突研究的元分析——基于CSSCI数据(1983-2013年)[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2020, 33(2): 154-162. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0017
引用本文: 杨丽, 王晓宇, 孙新强. 权利冲突研究的元分析——基于CSSCI数据(1983-2013年)[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2020, 33(2): 154-162. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0017
YANG Li, WANG Xiaoyu, SUN Xinqiang. Meta-analysis of Rights Conflict: Based on CSSCI Data, 1983-2013[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(2): 154-162. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0017
Citation: YANG Li, WANG Xiaoyu, SUN Xinqiang. Meta-analysis of Rights Conflict: Based on CSSCI Data, 1983-2013[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(2): 154-162. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0017

权利冲突研究的元分析——基于CSSCI数据(1983-2013年)

Meta-analysis of Rights Conflict: Based on CSSCI Data, 1983-2013

  • 摘要: 元分析是一种关于研究的研究方法。文章利用元分析这一研究方法,从总体状况、研究范式、研究视角、研究方法、研究主题五个维度,对1983-2013年间CSSCI收录的期刊中关于权利冲突的论文进行研究,分析权利冲突的研究特征和存在的问题,得出如下结论:权利冲突是真命题,权利边界具有确定及不确定的二重性,但整体是不确定的;权利存在位阶,权利在制定时是有位阶的,在实现时也是有位阶的,但有位阶并不代表不平等;权利冲突的研究贯穿立法、执法、司法等环节;随着社会的发展和科技的进步,权利冲突的形式与内容正发生着相应的变化,对此,须在研究方法、研究视角、研究主题等方面开展持之以恒的研究;采用不同的研究范式可能会得出明显不同的研究结论。

     

    Abstract: The meta-analysis is a research method on research results. By using the meta-analysis and CSSCI index data from 1983 to 2013, rights conflicts are analyzed from 5 research dimensions:the sketch, paradigms, perspectives, methods and topics. Finally the following findings are given:There exists rights ranks. The borders between rights are uncertain. Rights conflicts are not pseudo-propositions. Studies of rights conflict run through legislation, law enforcement, judiciary and others. With the society development and science progress, the form and content of rights conflict are changing. Different conclusions can be drawn by means of different research paradigms.

     

/

返回文章
返回