ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
周磊. 派驻监督:运动式腐败治理模式的自我调试[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2020, 33(5): 95-100. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0127
引用本文: 周磊. 派驻监督:运动式腐败治理模式的自我调试[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2020, 33(5): 95-100. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0127
ZHOU Lei. Departments of Discipline Inspection and Supervision: Self-debugging of Sports Anti-corruption Model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(5): 95-100. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0127
Citation: ZHOU Lei. Departments of Discipline Inspection and Supervision: Self-debugging of Sports Anti-corruption Model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 33(5): 95-100. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0127

派驻监督:运动式腐败治理模式的自我调试

Departments of Discipline Inspection and Supervision: Self-debugging of Sports Anti-corruption Model

  • 摘要: 派驻监督是中国转变腐败治理逻辑构建腐败治理常态机制的重要实践探索。从坚持和完善党和国家监督体系的战略格局来看,派驻监督仍存在职能设定与组织结构的互为影响、独立性与信息对称性的纠结、派驻机构内部领导机制的失序、派驻监督成效的层级递减等困境。结合党的十八大以来派驻监督的改革趋势,持续推动派驻监督创新发展,可以从四个方面着力:发挥派驻监督在预防腐败方面的比较优势、继续深化派驻机构统一管理改革、完善派驻机构的考核机制、加强派驻机构的专业化建设。

     

    Abstract: Departments of discipline inspection and supervision represents an important practical exploration of China's efforts to transform the logic of corruption governance and construct the normalcy mechanism of corruption governance. However, when it comes to the adherence to the strategic pattern of improving the Party and national supervision systems, accredited supervision still faces a series of issues, including the mutual impact between setting and organizational structure, the entanglement of independence and information symmetry, the disorder of accredited institutions' internal leadership mechanism, and the hierarchically diminishing effectiveness of accredited supervision. By referring to the reform trend of accredited supervision since the 18th National Congress of the Party, this paper proposes that the innovative development of accredited supervision could be promoted in the following aspects: give full play to the comparative advantages of accredited supervision in corruption preventions, deepen the reforms for a unified management of accredited institutions, improve the assessment mechanism of accredited institutions, and enhance the professional construction of accredited institutions.

     

/

返回文章
返回