北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 66-72,78.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0163

• 法学论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络交易平台提供商法律地位的重新界定

宋寒亮   

  1. 北京航空航天大学 法学院, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-19 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-12-02
  • 作者简介:宋寒亮(1986-),男,河南安阳人,博士研究生,研究方向为民商法学.

Redefinition of Legal Status of Internet Trading Platform Provider

Song Hanliang   

  1. Law School, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2015-03-19 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-12-02

摘要:

随着"网购"市场日益庞大,网络交易平台的作用显得越发重要,而确定网络交易平台提供商的法律地位则成为解决有关网络交易平台纠纷的首要问题.中国学界对此争议较大,尚未形成通说;2014年《消费者权益保护法》的规定,也只是站在消费者权益保护和侵权责任的视角,缺少对网络交易平台提供商所处具体法律关系的考量.通过基于合同角度的网络交易平台提供商的类型化分析,能够克服传统单一主体标准的不足,更全面而准确地界定网络交易平台提供商的法律地位.

关键词: 网络交易平台提供商, 法律地位, 2014年《消费者权益保护法》, 合同, 类型化分析

Abstract:

With the rapid development of "online shopping" market, the role of internet trading platform becomes increasingly important. The confirmation of the legal status of internet trading platform provider is the primary issue of solving disputes over internet trading platform. For this issue, there is a considerable controversy and no common theory in Chinese academic circle. The provision of the revised Consumer Protection Law only focuses on the protection of consumer rights and tort liability, but the specific legal relationships of internet trading platform provider are not considered by legislators. Through the typological analysis of internet trading platform provider from the perspective of contract, the shortage of traditional single subject standard can be overcome, and we may define the legal status of internet trading platform provider more comprehensively and accurately.

Key words: internet trading platform provider, legal status, 2014 Consumer Protection Law, contract, typological analysis

中图分类号: