Research Status, Features and Implications of the Science and Technology Innovation Policy Evaluation in Foreign Countries

doi:10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0389

Abstract

Abstract:

Under the background of the current reform on science and technology management, science and technology innovation policy evaluation has gradually become a research hot spot, receiving widespread attention from the government, innovation subjects in fields of science and technology, as well as Scientific Academia and etc. Through literature review, practice survey and case study, we found that the research achievements on science and technology innovation policy evaluation in foreign countries were pretty fruitful, and that they had certain enlightenment on our country in the perspectives of theoretical research and practical exploration of the policy evaluation framework, method and index. This paper suggested that in China, theoretical research on science and technology innovation policy evaluation lagged behind its practice, and that the faultiness on theoretical method and lack of evaluation paradigm had restrained the development of evaluation practice. Therefore, the next step of the development of science and technology innovation policy evaluation in our country should focus on strengthening the construction of evaluation theory and method system.

Key words: science and technology innovation policy, policy evaluation, evaluation framework, evaluation method, evaluation index

CLC Number:

C93-03

WANG Zaijin, XU Zhili. Research Status, Features and Implications of the Science and Technology Innovation Policy Evaluation in Foreign Countries[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2017, 30(2): 114-120.

References

[1] LUNDVALL B A,BORRAS S. Science,technology and innovation policy[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,2005:1-631.
[2] 肖士恩.科技创新政策评估的理论与方法初探[J].中国科技论坛,2003(5):24-26.
[3] ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Industrial inovation and public policy[M].London:Frances Printer,1981:19-30.
[4] 丹尼尔·马尔金.发展科技指标, 促进政策的分析和评估——OECD的经验[J].科技管理研究,2003(1):5-11.
[5] 王再进, 邢怀滨. 欧洲议会的技术评估及对我国的启示[J].自然辩证法研究, 2015(1):32-37.
[6] 李晓轩.科技政策学(SoSP):科技政策研究的新阶段[J].中国科学院院刊,2012(5):538-544.
[7] 贠杰,杨诚虎.公共政策评估:理论与方法[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006:261.
[8] 弗兰克·费希尔.公共政策评估[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:1-314.
[9] 古贝,林肯.第四代评估[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:1-233.
[10] 托马斯·戴伊.理解公共政策[M].12.北京:北京大学出版社,2011:285-290.
[11] EVERT V. Public policy and program evaluation[M].New Brunswickg NJ:Transaction Publishers,1997:1-336.
[12] SMITH T B.The policy implementation process[J].Policy Sciences,1973(4):197-209.
[13] UNPD.Handbook on planning,monitoring and evaluation for development results[M].New York:A.K.Office Supplies, 2009:83-125.
[14] NICK V T.Map-ping public support for innovation:A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France[J].Research Policy, 2008,37(9):1446-1464.
[15] HENRI C.Bruno van pottelsberche de lapotterie public support to R&D programmes:An integrated assessment scheme[R].Paris:OECD, 1997:35-47.
[16] AKCAKAYA R.Procedure for the assessment of R&D Performance for a manufacturing company[R].Istanbul:Marmara University,2001.
[17] KIM L. Imitation to Innovation[M].Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press, 1997:1-301.
[18] STEIL B,VICTOR D G,NELSON R R.Technological innovation and economic performance[M]. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press, 2002:1-476.
[19] NAUSHAD F;DAVIDW W. From technology and innovation:managing technology and innovation[M]. New York:Routledge,2002.
[20] 科技部科技评估中心.《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要》配套政策落实情况研究报告(2007-2009)[R].北京:科技部科技评估中心,2009:271-339.
[21] OECD. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy[EB/OL].[2015-07-31].http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdreviewsofinnovationpolicy.htm.
[22] 魏喜武,杨耀武.全球创新政策,中国有待加强——《2012全球创新政策指数报告》解读[J].华东科技,2012(7):28-29.