JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A ›› 2019, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 13-20.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0358
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Wenjie
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The core value of "Notice-Takedown" rule lies in its "safe harbor" effect, Internet service providers do not need to involve in the substantive disputes, even there is an infringement, they can still keep exempt from liability. "Notice-Takedown" rule is designed for internet information service platforms, which e-commerce platforms also belong to. Therefore, "Notice-Takedown" rule have the space to apply to e-commerce platforms. From the perspective of civil law theory,"Notice-Takedown" actually is one type of claim of absolute rights. "Notice-Takedown" rule for e-commerce platforms is a reasonable way for rights holders to implement defensive right of claim. On the other hand, if internet service providers are willing to carry out substantive investigation of disputes, law should not aggravate their liability, negligence liability rule should apply to encourage their enthusiasm, reduce costs of rights implementation and abuse of rights.
Key words: “Notice-Takedown&rdquo, rule, E-commerce platform, liability safe harbor, fault liability, injunction
CLC Number:
DF5
LIU Wenjie. “Notice-Takedown” Rule in “E-Commerce Law”[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2019, 32(6): 13-20.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/Jwk3_bhsk/EN/10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0358
https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/Jwk3_bhsk/EN/Y2019/V32/I6/13
[1] 吴汉东.侵权责任法视野下的网络侵权责任解析[J].法商研究,2010(6):28-31. [2] 王迁.论"通知与移除规则对专利领域的适用性——兼评专利法修订草案送审稿第63条第2款[J].知识产权,2016(3):20-32. [3] 詹映."通知-移除"规则在专利领域的适用性分析[J].法商研究,2017(6):176-187. [4] 武善学.论电商平台专利侵权中有效通知的法律要件[J].知识产权,2018(1):59-66. [5] 刘文杰."通知-删除"规定、必要措施与网络责任避风港——微信小程序案引发的思考[J].电子知识产权, 2019(4):4-13. [6] 董笃笃.电子商务领域知识产权权利警告的规制[J].知识产权,2016(4):71-77. [7] 王利明.论网络侵权中的通知规则[J].北方法学,2014(4):34-44. [8] 王胜明.中华人民共和国侵权责任法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2010:181.