JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A ›› 2019, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 68-73,89.DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0190
Previous Articles Next Articles
TU Xiaofang, SHI Xinping
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
In recent years, the state has attached great importance to community governance, and has continuously introduced relevant policies to provide a good policy environment for community governance innovation. On the basis of sorting out 55 community governance innovation cases selected by the Ministry of Civil Affairs from 2013 to 2015, the theoretical framework and the analysis framework of innovation motivation of community governance are constructed on the basis of rational choice institutionalism and institutional change dynamics theory. According to the indirect motivation and the type of income, the community governance innovation is divided into six categories:pressure conduction type, rule of law protection type, demand response type, contradiction response type, resident promotion type and technology driven type, and analyze the related factors that promote community governance innovation from the perspectives of direct motivation and indirect motivation. The direct drivers include the pressure from local government competition and the increase of financial input, and the innovation of community governance can meet the increasingly diversified needs of community residents and solve the development problems of neighborhood offices and neighborhood committees, promote the stable development of society; indirect causes include the provisions of policy documents, the promotion of information technology and the development of community social organizations.
Key words: community governance innovation, rational choice institutionalism, institutional change dynamics theory, law protection type, demand response type, contradiction response type, resident promotion type, technology driven type
CLC Number:
D669.3
TU Xiaofang, SHI Xinping. Types and Causes of Community Governance Innovation: Multi-case Study Based on “China Community Governance Innovation Award”[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2019, 32(5): 68-73,89.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/Jwk3_bhsk/EN/10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2019.0190
https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/Jwk3_bhsk/EN/Y2019/V32/I5/68
[1] 王江伟.中国社区治理创新的特征、动因与绩效——基于"中国社区治理创新成果"的多案例分析[J].求实,2017(12):61-73. [2] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].[2019-07-08]. http://www.xinhuanet.com//2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm. [3] 黄亮.当代中国地方政府创新的动力:要素与模式[D].杭州:浙江大学,2017. [4] 彼得·豪尔, 罗斯玛丽·泰勒, 何俊智.政治科学与三个新制度主义[J].经济社会体制比较,2003(5):20-29. [5] 河连燮.制度分析:理论与争议(第2版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014. [6] 道格拉斯·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:格致出版社,2016:108-123. [7] 拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论[EB/OL].[2019-07-08]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/f3213504240c844768eaee1e.html. [8] 林毅夫. 关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁[EB/OL].(2011-09-21)[2019-05-01]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/6797f3731ed9ad51foldf2b2.html. [9] 何艳玲,李妮.为创新而竞争:一种新的地方政府竞争机制[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,70(1):87-96. [10] 国家图书馆研究院. 中国互联网络信息中心发布第43次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[J].国家图书馆学刊,2019,28(2):13. [11] 王轲.中国城市社区治理创新的特征、动因及趋势[J].城市问题,2019(3):67-76.