Competing Discourse on Farmland Red Line: Controversy and Its Implication in Sustainable Development

doi:10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2015.0230

Abstract

Abstract:

The route towards sustainable development is much more controversial than the goal itself. Too often, people with different cognition and values cannot achieve consensus on "what the problem is" and "what should be done" in pursuit of a better sustainable development model. By using the debate on farmland red line in China as a typical example, this paper attempts to demonstrate how policy discourse competes with each other at different levels and how they shape people's thinking. In this case, either land-control discourse or land-utilized discourse has its own evidence, interpretations and epistemic figures that resist from the opponent's argument. The paper finally emphasizes the importance of democratic deliberation, which may play a crucial role in challenging discursive hegemony, creating arenas for communication and facilitating consensus building to realize effective environmental governance and sustainable development.

Key words: farmland red line, discourse analysis, policy controversy, sustainable development, deliberation

CLC Number:

LI Ya, HE Jianzi. Competing Discourse on Farmland Red Line: Controversy and Its Implication in Sustainable Development[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND A, 2016, 29(3): 15-22.

References

[1] 约翰·德雷泽克. 地球政治学:环境话语[M]. 蔺雪春, 郭晨星,译. 济南:山东大学出版社, 2012:8-144.
[2] FISCHER F, FORESTER J. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning[M]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993:1-3.
[3] HAJER M. The politics of environmental discourse ecological modernization and the policy process[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:59.
[4] HAJER M. A Frame in the Fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics[C] //HAJER M, WAGENAAR H. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 44-110.
[5] 林子伦. 台湾气候变迁政策之论述分析[J]. 公共行政学报, 2008, 28: 153-175.
[6] 张海柱. 环境政策争论的话语分析-以PM2.5争议与环境空气质量标准修订为例[J]. 太平洋学报, 2012, 20(6): 62-70.
[7] 黄德林, 李向阳, 蔡松峰. 基于中国农业CGE模型的耕地政策对粮食安全影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(23):143-149.
[8] 陈印军, 易小燕, 方琳娜, 等. 中国耕地资源及其粮食生产能力分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2012, 33(6): 4-10.
[9] 张琳, 陈逸, 张群, 等. 基于基尼系数的耕地保有量分配优化模型[J]. 经济地理, 2012(6): 132-137.
[10] 王文龙. 中国农村土地制度改革相关理论评述[J]. 东南学术, 2012(4): 19-28.
[11] 王文龙. 中国"三农"问题理论的范式冲突、学术生态与迷思之我见[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2014, 35(1): 48-52.
[12] 王文龙, 万颖. 中国刘易斯拐点和耕地红线的判断与三农治理新思维[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2012, 33(3): 290-294.
[13] 郄建荣. 18亿亩耕地红线守得住吗?[N]. 中华新闻报, 2007-06-29(C02).
[14] 温家宝. 国务院政府工作报告[EB/OL].(2009-03-16)[2014-05-20]. http://www.gov.cn/test/2009-03/16/content_1260188.html.
[15] 北京天则经济研究所. 粮食安全与耕地保护[R]. 北京: 天则经济研究所, 2008:72.
[16] 盛洪. 18亿亩红线的制度含义[EB/OL]. (2009-05-31)[2014-08-12].http://finance.ifeng.com/opinion/fhzl/2009053 1/721267.shtml.
[17] 陈志武. 18亿亩红线已过时, 一块地可以盖50层楼种粮[EB/OL]. (2010-09-20)[2014-08-10]. http://finance.ifeng.com/opinion/macro/20100920/2638872.shtml.
[18] 许小年. 许小年呼吁取消土地红线, 人为控制导致高房价[EB/OL]. (2011-11-06)[2014-05-20]. http://cangzhou.focus.cn/news/2011-11-06/1570892_all.html.
[19] 周天勇. 十八亿亩耕地红线是让谬误主持政治[EB/OL]. (2012-11-04)[2014-08-12]. http://business.sohu.com/20121104/n356606001.shtml.
[20] 袁隆平. 保住18亿亩耕地红线有难度[EB/OL]. (2009-04-08)[2014-05-20].http://news.ifeng.com/mainland/200904/0408_17_1096136_3.shtml.
[21] 陈锡文.中国18亿亩耕地的"红线"没有被突破[EB/OL]. (2010-02-01)[2014-09-12]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2010-02/01/content_12914425.html
[22] 陈锡文. 坚守"农根", 18亿亩土地红线未被突破[EB/OL]. (2011-03-09)[2014-09-12]. http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20110309/3614549_0.shtml.
[23] 胡鞍钢.应设"粮食储备"红线保证粮食安全[EB/OL]. (2014-03-17)[2014-08-12]. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/z/2014qglh/sibian8.html.
[24] 任晓. 金融四十人论坛课题报告建议:改变严守耕地红线思路, 启动新一轮分税制改革[N]. 中国证券报, 2013-05-27(A01).
[25] 仲伟周, 王筝, 王艺. 耕地红线与房地产市场的相关性及政策含义[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2011(6): 15-19.
[26] 宋丙涛, 潘美薇. 经济发展与国家粮食安全困局的破解[J]. 中州学刊, 2013(12): 51-53.
[27] 侯为民, 孙咏梅. 紧约束条件下中国粮食安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2014, 35(3): 36-41.
[28] 姜宏. 耕地红线的合理性探讨[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2013, 25: 36-37.
[29] 徐绍史. 坚决守住18亿亩耕地红线[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2008(1): 8-11.
[30] 胡传景, 王金地, 江雪芹. 对"守住18亿亩耕地红线"的思考[J]. 中国房地产金融, 2008( 2): 6-10.
[31] 孟勤国, 黄莹. 中国农村土地法律政策的三个前置性问题[J]. 西南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版, 2010(7): 96-100.
[32] 李斌. 三论18亿亩耕地红线该不该守[N]. 证券时报, 2012-08-28(A03).
[33] SUSSKIND L, JAIN R K, MARTYNIUK A O. Better environmental policy studies: How to design and conduct more effective analysis[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001.
[34] HAJER M, WAGENAAR H. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[35] DRYZEK J, HAYLEY S. Democratizing global climate governance[M]. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[36] 李亚. 利益博弈政策实验方法: 理论与应用[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
[37] 理查德·伯恩斯坦. 社会政治理论的重构[M]. 黄瑞琪,译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2008.
[38] INNES J, BOOHER D. Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy[M]. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010:35-36.