ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C
钟爽, 徐小峰. 人工智能在应急管理中的应用及其风险分类——基于文献与案例的综述研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2024.1081
引用本文: 钟爽, 徐小峰. 人工智能在应急管理中的应用及其风险分类——基于文献与案例的综述研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2024.1081
ZHONG Shuang, XU Xiaofeng. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Management and Risk Classification——An Overview Study Based on Literature and Cases[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2024.1081
Citation: ZHONG Shuang, XU Xiaofeng. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Management and Risk Classification——An Overview Study Based on Literature and Cases[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008−2204.2024.1081

人工智能在应急管理中的应用及其风险分类基于文献与案例的综述研究

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Management and Risk ClassificationAn Overview Study Based on Literature and Cases

  • 摘要: 随着新型工业化发展稳步推进,人工智能(AI)在应急管理的不同阶段和不同灾害情境下的应用日益增多,相较以往,风险呈现出新的特征和态势。但当前AI赋能应急管理存在的应用及各类风险仍缺乏系统性梳理。为提升AI赋能应急管理的效率与效果,亟待厘清当前AI在应急管理中具体应用及其风险类别。因此,结合相关文献与具体案例,对AI在应急管理中的应用与潜在风险进行文献回顾研究。综述发现,AI广泛应用于风险管理、应急准备、应急响应和应急恢复四个时期,涵盖风险预警、模拟预测、心理辅导等16类具体应用,适用于洪灾、地震等多种情境。同时,基于“人—AI—人与AI交互”三个维度,整合了AI应用于应急管理面临的个人隐私与数据安全、数据偏差与算法歧视、交互稳健程度等9类风险挑战,并由人与AI交互维度的系统与算法、价值与伦理、公众可接受度、组织可接受度等问题对AI赋能应急管理进行系统性风险分类。

     

    Abstract: With the development of new industrialization advancing steadily, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in the different stages of emergency management and the application of different disaster scenarios is increasing, compared with the past, the risk of presenting new features and dynamics. However, the current application of AI—enabled emergency management and various types of risks still lack systematic sorting. In order to improve the efficiency and effect of AI technology—enabled emergency management, it is urgent to clarify the current specific applications of AI in emergency management and its risk categories. Therefore, a literature review of the applications and potential risks of AI technology in emergency management is conducted by combining relevant literature and specific cases. The review finds that AI technology is widely used in four periods: risk management, emergency preparedness, emergency response, and emergency recovery, covering 16 categories of specific applications such as risk early warning, simulation and prediction, psychological counseling, etc., which are applicable to a variety of scenarios such as floods and earthquakes. At the same time, based on the three dimensions of “human—AI—human—AI interaction”, it integrates nine types of risk challenges faced by AI technology applied to emergency management, such as personal privacy and data security, data bias and algorithmic discrimination, and the degree of robustness of interaction, etc. It also integrates nine types of risk challenges faced by AI technology applied to emergency management, such as the systems and algorithms, values and ethics, public acceptability, organization and organization. Ethics, Public Acceptability, and Organizational Acceptability to classify the systematic risks of AI—enabled emergency management.

     

/

返回文章
返回