ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

《碳中和实施法》的立法规制和制度构建

Regulatory Features and Institutional Construction of the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act

  • 摘要: 在气候变化国家立法问题上,中国存在“应对气候变化法”和“碳达峰碳中和”两种可选立法体例。立足中国实际和参考域外经验,碳达峰碳中和立法体例更能实现碳减排、绿色低碳发展的目标和公正过渡的价值理性,是必要且可行的选择。碳达峰碳中和专门立法应定位为“碳中和实施法”且以此为法律名称。《碳中和实施法》体现了多元的立法规制特征:具有直接目标、间接目标和长远目标的层次性目标,呈现专门规制、协同规制和问责规制的多重功能,以及由规制内容决定的不同效力的规范表达。在构建《碳中和实施法》的制度体系时,应将其立法规制特征转化为法律制度的立法表达方案,制定目标导向类、过程控制与结果考评、公正过渡保障的专门性法律制度,项目碳评价、碳汇生态产品价值实现、绿色低碳转型资金保障的嵌合性法律制度,以及后果性法律责任制度。

     

    Abstract: On the issue of national legislation on climate change, there are two options in China, namely the “Law on Responding to Climate Change” and the “Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral Law”. Based on China’s actual situation and foreign experience, the Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutral Law, which can better achieve the goals of carbon emission reduction, green and low-carbon development and the value rationality of just transition, is a more necessary and feasible choice. It shall be legislatively designated as the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act, with this title constituting its statutory nomenclature. The Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act embodies pluralistic legislative regulatory features: the hierarchical objectives of direct, indirect and long-term goals, and presents the multiple functions of specialized regulation, synergistic regulation and accountability regulation, as well as the normative expression of different effects determined by the regulatory content. In constructing the institutional system of the Carbon Neutrality Implementation Act, its legislative regulatory features should be transformed into a legislative expression programme for the legal system. That is, formulating the specialised legal regime for goal orientation, process control and evaluation of results, and fair transition safeguards, and the chimeric legal regime for project carbon evaluation, realization of the value of ecological products from carbon sinks, and safeguarding funds for the green and low-carbon transition, as well as the consequentialist legal regime.

     

/

返回文章
返回