On Natural Person to Bring Environmental Public Interest Litigation
-
摘要: 随着改革开放的不断深入,中国市场经济开始由粗放化向集约化转型,在这期间,生态环境被破坏的不良影响逐渐显现,人们对良好公共生态环境的利益诉求与日俱增.在这样的现实背景下,新修订的《民事诉讼法》正式将环境公益诉讼制度确立为一项法定制度,这标志着中国对生态环境的法律保护前进了一大步.然而,环境保护的立法进程却始终追赶不上人们对环境保护的理想诉求.中国立法中环境公益诉讼的原告资格仅限法律规定的机关和有关组织,并未涉及自然人;英美法系和大陆法系国家都赋予了自然人担当公益诉讼原告的资格.因而,进一步完善自然人提起环境公益诉讼制度就成为环境保护理论探讨的着力点之一.Abstract: With the deepening of reform and opening-up, China's market economy began to transform from extensive economy to intensive economy. However, ecological environment has been destroyed in this period, and people's demand for good public environment grows with each passing day. In this context, the environmental public interest litigation system is formally established by the newly-revised "Civil Procedure Law" as a legal system, which marks a big step forward towards the legal protection of the ecological environment in China. However, the legislative process of environmental protection can't catch up with the ideal demand on the environmental protection, and the plaintiff of environmental public interest litigation in the legislation is confined to relevant organs and organizations, not relating to the natural person. But the natural person is entitled to public interest litigation in both continental law system countries and Anglo American law system countries. Therefore, to perfect the system of the natural person bringing forward the environmental public interest litigation has become one of the important issues of the theory of environmental protection.
-
-
[1] 岳彩申,杨青贵.论经济法不确定性的成因与功能——解释法律规范性的新视角[J].法学评论,2010(2):37-45. [2] 高雁,高桂林.环境公益诉讼原告资格的扩展与限制[J].河北法学,2011,29(3):153-160. [3] 周蕊,马天云.环保公益诉讼之路离畅通还有多远?[EB/OL].(2014-02-26)[2014-03-01]. [4] 马天云, 吴昊.石家庄:难忍雾霾天,市民状告环保局索赔1万[N].新华每日电讯, 2014-02-27(005). [5] 孙静.政治文明视野下的公民有序政治参与[J].延边党校学报, 2012, 27(4): 25-27. [6] 陈立明.政治文明与公民社会的成长[J].江苏省社会主义学院学报,2013(3):34-36. [7] Noorani A G. Public interest litigation[J]. Economic and Political Weekly,1984,19(36): 1568-1569.
[8] 程龙.论程序正义与现代法律文明——一种基于程序正义理念的法哲学思考[J].行政与法, 2010(6): 101-103. [9] 肖建华,柯阳友.论公益诉讼之诉的利益[J].河北学刊,2011, 31(2): 143-147. [10] 黄锡生, 任洪涛.生态利益公平分享的法律制度探析[J],内蒙古社会科学:汉文版, 2013, 34(3): 75-79. [11] 李霞.波斯纳:法律的经济分析[M].黑龙江:黑龙江大学出版社,2009: 132. [12] 储皖中, 施怀基.昆明建环保公益诉讼救济专项资金 诉讼者每案最高可获20万[N].法制日报, 2010-09-24(001). [13] 曹建明.最高人民检察院工作报告[N].检察日报,2011-03-20(01). [14] 阎志江, 万静.公民个人提起环境公益诉讼首案开庭 索赔环境损失过百万元 检察院派员出庭[N].法制日报, 2012-09-27(006). [15] 杨亚辉.美国环境公民诉讼的诉前通知[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2010(8): 133-135. [16] 颜运秋,罗婷.生态环境保护公益诉讼的激励约束机制研究[J].中南大学学报:社会科学版, 2013,19(3): 42-48. [17] 郑玉波.法谚: 一[M].北京:法律出版社, 2007: 23.
计量
- 文章访问数: 641
- HTML全文浏览量: 48
- PDF下载量: 332
下载:
