ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

防空识别区划设的国际法问题一种国际避险理论的解释

International Law Issues on Air Defense Identification Zones: An Explanation of an International Hedging Theory

  • 摘要: 防空识别区因其国际法上的“灰色地带”而备受争议,国际社会并未明确反对也未明确支持防空识别区的合法性。中国2013年划设东海防空识别区,争议主要来自于是否可能构成对争议海域的事实上的主权从而妨碍飞越和航行自由,以及是否可能突破有限制的信息收集管辖权而转向为军事化区域。实际上,防空识别区是国际海洋法中海洋权益和航行自由这一矛盾的衍生。国际社会对防空识别区的容忍,来自于沿海国建立防空识别区大多遵守了一些已存的一致认识。国际避险理论可以解释防空识别区在国防安全意义减少的当代世界,为何还会存在和得到重视。防空识别区是沿海国维护海洋利益的有效工具,但是也可能将争议海域更加复杂化,这取决于各利益关联方的理性态度和谨慎行为。

     

    Abstract: The Air Defence Identification Zones (ADIZ) is controversial because of its “grey area” in international law, and the international community has neither explicitly opposed nor explicitly supported the legality of the ADIZ. China established the East China Sea ADIZ in 2013. Disputes mainly stem from whether it may constitute de facto sovereignty over the disputed waters, thereby hindering the freedom of overflight and navigation, and whether it may break through the restricted jurisdiction of information collection and turn it into a militarized area. In fact, the ADIZ is a derivative of the contradiction between maritime rights and freedom of navigation in the international law of the sea. The international community's tolerance for the ADIZ comes from the fact that the establishment of the ADIZ by coastal states mostly abides by some existing consensus. International hedging theory can explain why ADIZ still exist and are valued in a contemporary world where the significance of national defense security is diminished. ADIZ is an effective tool for coastal states to safeguard maritime interests, but it may also complicate the disputed waters, which depends on the rational attitude and prudent behavior of various stakeholders.

     

/

返回文章
返回