ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

《联合国打击网络犯罪公约》中技术侦查的区分性规制

Differentiated Regulation of Technical Investigation in the United Nations Convention Against Cybercrime

  • 摘要: 《联合国打击网络犯罪公约》规定了实时收集流量数据和拦截内容数据两种技术侦查措施,并区分了实时性侦查措施与回溯性侦查措施、内容数据与流量数据、执法机关与网络服务提供者,体现出区分性规制的特点。然而,中国技术侦查条款在实体范围、数据类型、程序要件上呈现概括性规制的特征,在比例原则方面尚有提升空间。对此,应当实现国内技术侦查条款与《联合国打击网络犯罪公约》的规范对接。一是将“技术侦查措施”修改为“秘密侦查措施”,并与其他侦查措施进行区分;二是以内容数据与流量数据作为数据分类规则,以敏感个人信息与一般个人信息作为数据分级规则;三是区分高干预技术侦查措施与低干预技术侦查措施,并匹配不同的程序要件。

     

    Abstract: The United Nations Convention Against Cybercrime stipulates two types of technical investigation measures: real-time collection of traffic data and interception of content data. It differentiates between real-time investigation measures and retrospective investigation measures, content data and traffic data, as well as law enforcement agencies and network service providers, reflecting the characteristics of differentiated regulation. However, China's technical investigation provisions exhibit the features of general regulation in terms of substantive scope, data types, and procedural requirements, leaving room for improvement with the requirements of the principle of proportionality. In this regard, it is necessary to align domestic technical investigation provisions with the norms of the Convention. Firstly, "technical investigation measures" should be revised to "covert investigation measures" and distinguished from other investigation measures. Secondly, content data and traffic data should be used as data classification rules, and sensitive personal information and general personal information as data grading rules. Thirdly, high-intervention technical investigation measures and low-intervention technical investigation measures should be distinguished, and different procedural requirements should be matched accordingly.

     

/

返回文章
返回