ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

言为心声与身世考索 ——以朱淑真"婚外恋"说为例

彭庭松

彭庭松. 言为心声与身世考索 ——以朱淑真"婚外恋"说为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2004, 17(3): 23-27.
引用本文: 彭庭松. 言为心声与身世考索 ——以朱淑真"婚外恋"说为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2004, 17(3): 23-27.
PENG Ting-song. Words Are the Voice of the Mind and Textual Research on One's Life Experience——Taking “Love of Outsidemarriage” of Zhu Shuzhen as An Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2004, 17(3): 23-27.
Citation: PENG Ting-song. Words Are the Voice of the Mind and Textual Research on One's Life Experience——Taking “Love of Outsidemarriage” of Zhu Shuzhen as An Example[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2004, 17(3): 23-27.

言为心声与身世考索 ——以朱淑真"婚外恋"说为例

详细信息
    作者简介:

    彭庭松(1971-),男,江西吉水人,博士研究生,研究方向为唐宋文学与文化.

  • 中图分类号: I024

Words Are the Voice of the Mind and Textual Research on One's Life Experience——Taking “Love of Outsidemarriage” of Zhu Shuzhen as An Example

  • 摘要: 有论者依据言为心声的原则来考索朱淑真的"婚外恋"事实,这种做法值得商榷。言为心声这一命题的成立,应有相当的限度和合适的语境。由于创作主体和形式受到诸多因素的限制,"言"与"心声"常表现出不和谐性。这一命题的合理意义更多地是在道德价值范畴里展开 ,恰是身世考索的结果为它的合理性提供依据,而不是相反。诗歌尤其是抒情诗的审美特质,使得"言"、"情"、"事"三者未必环环相扣,"以诗证史"时须慎之又慎。
    Abstract: Someone discuss the “love of outsidemarriage” of Zhu Shuzhen according to the principle of “words are the voice of the mind”. But this kind of discussion is not very rational. The parlance of “words are the voice of the mind” will be right only in some specific situations and proper talking background. Because the author herself and her poems were restricted by many kinds of factors, sometimes her “voice” and “mind” disagree with each other. The parlance of “words are the voice of the mind” will be more rational in the scope of morality and value. Only the exploration of Zhu Shuzhen's life experiences can provide evidence to the rationality of this parlance rather than the opposite status. The particularity of poems especially the lyrics tells us that words, feelings and things don't always keep in accordance with each other. We must be deliberate when using poems to testify the history facts.
  • [1] 冀勤.朱淑真集注[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1985.
    [2] 黄嫣梨.朱淑真研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1992.
    [3] 俞平伯.唐宋词选释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1979.159.
    [4] 卢卡契.审美特性:第一卷[M].徐恒醇译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986.306.
    [5] 蒋培坤.从人的自由生命表现看人类的艺术活动[J].中国人民大学学报,1987,(2):102.
    [6] 马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,1985.125.
    [7] 豪泽尔.艺术史的哲学[M].陈超南,刘天华译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992.
    [8] 钱钟书.七缀集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
    [9] 钱钟书.管锥编(第二册)[M].北京:中华书局,1979.454.
    [10] 钱钟书.谈艺录(订补本)[M].北京:中华书局,1993.163.
    [11] 周振甫.文心雕龙注释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.405.
    [12] 童庆炳.文学活动的审美阐释[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社,1988.79.
    [13] 别林斯基.别林斯基论文学[M].北京:新文艺出版社,1958.16.
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2003-10-08
  • 发布日期:  2004-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回