高级搜索
ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

政府管制的法经济学解释:一个文献综述

吴伟

吴伟. 政府管制的法经济学解释:一个文献综述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2010, 23(6): 1-8.
引用本文: 吴伟. 政府管制的法经济学解释:一个文献综述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2010, 23(6): 1-8.
shu
WU Wei. An Explanation of Law and Economics of Government Regulation: A Literature Review[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(6): 1-8.
Citation: WU Wei. An Explanation of Law and Economics of Government Regulation: A Literature Review[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(6): 1-8.
shu

政府管制的法经济学解释:一个文献综述

  • 对外经济贸易大学 公共管理学院,北京 100029

基金项目: 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(08JC790017);国家社会科学基金一般项目(10BGL103);对外经济贸易大学科研项目(07QD02);对外经济贸易大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目(73100041);北京市教育委员会共建项目(471401)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    吴伟(1970-),男,湖北当阳人,副教授,博士后,研究方向为公共经济学、政府管制.

  • 中图分类号: D035

An Explanation of Law and Economics of Government Regulation: A Literature Review

  • School of Public Administration, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 从法经济学角度,政府管制是对法律的替代或补充。管制与法律的替代或补充理论包括政府直接管制与普通法体系效率论、控制社会无序的公共管制与法律理论以及法律的不完全性与政府管制理论三种,他们从处理市场失灵和维护社会秩序和正义的角度出发,认为管制和法律都是社会控制的方式,当法律不能够很好地解决这些问题时,管制和管制机构就被引入发挥作用。显然,这种政府管制理论在促使人们从更微观的原子层面理解政府管制的意义、作用和存在范围方面提供了新的洞见。这对于转轨期的中国反思法律体系的局限性、认识政府管制的正面作用、审视管制改革的方向和力度,具有重要的启示作用。
    Abstract: From the angle of Law and Economics, government regulation is a substitute or complement to law. Theories of substitute or complement of regulation to law consist of efficient theory of direct government versus law, theory of regulation and law to control social disorder and theory of incomplete law and government regulation. From the standpoint of restraining market failure and maintaining social order and justice, these theories indicate that government and law are all methods of social control. Once law can not cope with market failure and social disorder, regulation and regulatory body come into play. Evidently, this kind of theory of regulation gives a hint of wholly understanding regulation, which is an important revelation of effect of regulation. This can make us know limitation of legal system, rethink positive effect of regulation and consider direction and limit of reform of regulation.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(42)
  • [1] Posner Richard A. A theory of negligence[J]. Journal of Legal Studies, 1972, 1: 29-50.
    [2] Posner Richard A. Economic analysis of law[M]. 6th edition. NowYork: Aspen Publishers, 2002.
    [3] Polinsky Mitchell, Shavell Steven. The economic theory of public enforcement of law[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, 38.
    [4] Rose-Ackerman Susan. Effluent charges: a critique[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1973, 6:512-28.
    [5] Shavell S. Liability for harm versus regulation of safety[J]. Journal of Legal Studies, 1984b, 13.
    [6] Shavell S. A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1984a, 15:271-280.
    [7] Shavell S. The economic analysis of accident law[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1987:205-316.
    [8] Kolstad C D, Ulen T S, Johnson G V. Ex post liability for harm vs. ex ante safety regulation: substitutes or complements?[J] American Economic Review, 1990, 80:888-901.
    [9] Geest De G, Dari-Mattiacci G. Soft regulators, tough judges[J]. Supreme Court Economic Review, 2007, 15:119-140.
    [10] Schmitz P. On the joint use of liability and safety regulation [J].International Review of Law and Economics, 2000, 20:371-382.
    [11] Hiriart Y, Martimort D, Pouyet J.On the optimal use of ex ante regulation and ex post liability[J]. Economics Letters, 2004, 84:231-235.
    [12] Kim I. Securities laws ‘facilitating’ private enforcement[J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2008, 25:17-38.
    [13] Glaeser Edward L, Shleifer Andrei. The rise of the regulatory state[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2003a, XLI (June).
    [14] Coase R H. The problem of social cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics,1960,3(Oct).
    [15] Maxim Boycko, Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert. Privatizing Russia[M]. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1995:459-650
    [16] Glaeser Edward L, Shleifer Andrei. A reason for quantity regulation[J].American Economic Review, 2001, 91(2):31-435.
    [17] Tullock Gordon. The welfare cost of tariffs, monopoly and theft[J].Western Economics Journal, 1967, 5:224-232.
    [18] Posner R A. Theories of economic regulation[J].The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1974, 5(2):335-365.
    [19] Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert. Corruption[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993,108: 599-618.
    [20] Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert. The grabbing hand: government pathologies and their cures[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1998:547-552.
    [21] Ades Alberto, Tella Rafael Di. National champions and corruption: some unpleasant interventionist arithmetic[J]. Economic Journal,1997, 107:1023-1042.
    [22] Djankov Simeon, Glaeser Edward, La Porta Rafael, et al.The new comparative economics[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003b, 31:137-155.
    [23] Glaeser Edward, Johnson Simon, Shleifer Andrei. Coase versus the coasians[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116(3).
    [24] La Porta Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes Florencio, Shleifer Andrei. What works in securities laws?[J]. Journal of Finance, 2006,61: 1-32.
    [25] Stigler George J. Public regulation of the securities market[J].Journal of Business, 1964, 37:117- 142.
    [26] Grossman Sanford. The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1981,24: 461-483.
    [27] Milgrom Paul, Roberts John. Relying on the information of interested parties[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1986, 17:18-32.
    [28] Easterbrook Frank, Fischel Daniel. Mandatory disclosure and the protection of investors[J]. Virginia Law Review, 1984, 70:669-715.
    [29] Hay Jonathan R, Shleifer Andrei. Private enforcement of public laws: a theory of legal reform[J]. The Amercian Economic Review, 1998, 88(2):398-403.
    [30] Pistor Katharina, Xu Chenggang. Fiduciary duty in transitional civil law jurisdictions. 2002c.
    [31] La Porta Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes Florencio, Shleifer Andrei. The economic consequences of legal origins[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2008, 146(2):285-332.
    [32] Roe Mark J. Legal origins, politics, and modern stock markets[J]. Harvard Law Review, 2006, 120(2):460-527.
    [33] Xu Chenggang, Pistor Katharina. Law enforcement under incomplete law: theory and evidence from financial market regulation. London: London School of Economics and Political Science,2002a.
    [34] Becker Gary S. Crime and punishment: an economic approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1968,76:169-217.
    [35] Stigler George J. The optimal enforcement of laws[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1970,8 (3):526-536.
    [36] Xu Chenggang, Pistor Katharina.Incomplete law-a conceptual and analytical framework-and its application to the evolution of financial market regulation. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences, 2002b.
    [37] La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A,et al.Agency problems and dividend policies around the world[J].The Journal of Finance, 2000,55(1):1-33.
    [38] Coase R H. The firm, the market, and the law[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988:185-205.
    [39] 陈冬华,章铁生,李翔. 法律环境、政府管制与隐性契约[J].经济研究,2008(3):56-87.
    [40] 中级法院院长腐败现象突出,成各‘公关’重点. (2008-01-29).
    [41] 王胜俊. 破解打官司难从畅通的民意表达机制开始.(2008-06-23).
    [42] 改革开放30年:特色社会主义立法转向攻坚克难期. (2008-11-19).
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2034
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  1125
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-10-19
  • 发布日期:  2010-11-24

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(42)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》编辑部
    电话: 010-82338013E-mail: bhskxb@buaa.edu.cn邮编：100083

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发  百度统计