ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

关联理论在文学翻译中的运用及存在的问题

符赛男

符赛男. 关联理论在文学翻译中的运用及存在的问题[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2010, 23(6): 73-76.
引用本文: 符赛男. 关联理论在文学翻译中的运用及存在的问题[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2010, 23(6): 73-76.
FU Sai-nan. The Connection and Distance between Relevance Theory and Literary Translation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(6): 73-76.
Citation: FU Sai-nan. The Connection and Distance between Relevance Theory and Literary Translation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 23(6): 73-76.

关联理论在文学翻译中的运用及存在的问题

详细信息
    作者简介:

    符赛男(1985-),女,壮族,广西钦州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为翻译理论与实践.

  • 中图分类号: H315.9

The Connection and Distance between Relevance Theory and Literary Translation

  • 摘要: 关联理论把语言交际看作是一个明示—推理的过程,关注的核心问题是交际与认知。关联理论对文学翻译研究有相当大的贡献,它能解释翻译的可译性、效度、重译等问题。然而,关联理论的研究对象是语内交际,而文学翻译的研究对象是跨文化交际,它涉及社会文化、社会背景等问题,其交际过程并非只针对信息意图和交际意图而进行的简单的逻辑推理过程。因此,关联理论与文学翻译是有距离的,它不能为文学翻译中的文化缺省现象提供有效的解决方法。
    Abstract: Relevance theory, which regards verbal communication as an ostensive-inferential process, focuses on communication and cognition. This theory has made great contribution to the study of literary translation. It explains why literary works are translatable. It can also make suitable explanation to the degree of contexual effect and to the phenomenon of retranslation. However, the object of relevance theory is the communication of co-culture, and the object of literary translation is intercultural communication. Therefore, literary translation has to deal with some issues like social culture, background knowledge and so on. Moreover, literary translation is not a simple logically inferential process of informative intention and communicative intention. That is, there is some distance between relevance theory and literary translation, because relevance theory cannot provide practicable means to the cultural default of literary translation.
  • [1] Grice H P. Studies in the way of words[M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989: 368.
    [2] 何自然.语用学讲稿[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2003:236.
    [3] Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986:28-35.
    [4] Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance theory[M]//Horn Laurence R,Ward Gregory. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004: 610-625.
    [5] Gutt Ernst-august. Translation and relevance[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2006.
    [6] 王斌. 关联理论对翻译解释的局限性[J]. 中国翻译,2000(4):13-16.
    [7] Cook G. Discourse and literature[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1995: 255-273.
    [8] 姜望琪. 关联理论质疑[J]. 外语研究,2001(4):26-31.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1650
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  1032
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2009-08-29
  • 发布日期:  2010-11-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回