A Comparison of Italian-style Plea Bargaining with that of the United States
-
摘要: 出于提高诉讼效率之考虑而源于英美法的辩诉交易制度,由于该制度之明显优势,在美国已由起初确立时的"配角"地位转变成为了"主角",这一变化也一定程度影响了传统大陆法系国家。在罗马法的诞生地意大利,1988年及其后修订的刑事诉讼法里也增加了具有辩诉交易性质的协议程序。不同法律文化传统下的两种辩诉交易各自表现如何,对人们有什么样的启发,文章将从几个方面进行比较分析,以期为中国立法提供一些借鉴。Abstract: For efficiency of the proceedings of the considerations from the Anglo-American law, the plea bargaining system, due to the obvious advantage of the system, changed from the "supporting role" of the first days when it was first established in the United States, to have become a "leading role"; this change also affected to some extent the traditional civil law countries. In Italy, the birthplace of Roman law, the 1988 and the subsequent revised Criminal Procedure Law is also added with a plea bargain in the nature of the agreement process. What are the differences and the inspirations of the two plea bargainings under different legal and cultural traditions? From several aspects of this comparative analysis, this article provides some reference to China-s legislation.
-
Keywords:
- plea bargaining /
- comparison and reference /
- litigation efficiency
-
-
[1] Douglas D Guidorizzi. Should we really "ban"plea bargaining? The core concerns of plea bargaining critics[J]. Emory Law Journal,1998,47:753. [2] Pisani M, Moralri A, Perchinunno V, et al. Manuale DI procedura penale[M]. Bologna: Monduzzi, 2000. [3] Aurelio Barazzetta. Gli snodi processuale, la nuova udienza preliminare ed i riti speciali[J]. Indice Penale,2000,3(2): 501-580. [4] 徐静村,潘金贵.论检察官在辩诉交易中的地位和权力[M]//陈光中.辩诉交易在中国.北京:中国检察出版社,2002:66. [5] 左为民.简易刑事程序研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2005. [6] 孙维萍,邓云.再看意大利刑事司法改革[J].中国刑事法杂志,2006(4):120-124.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1452
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 1113
下载:
