ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

美国工程伦理教育评价研究

胡文龙

胡文龙. 美国工程伦理教育评价研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2011, 24(6): 102-107.
引用本文: 胡文龙. 美国工程伦理教育评价研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2011, 24(6): 102-107.
Hu Wenlong. On Evaluation of Engineering Ethics Education in American[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2011, 24(6): 102-107.
Citation: Hu Wenlong. On Evaluation of Engineering Ethics Education in American[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2011, 24(6): 102-107.

美国工程伦理教育评价研究

详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡文龙(1981—),男,河南周口人,博士研究生,研究方向为工程教育、高等教育学.

  • 中图分类号: G40-058.1

On Evaluation of Engineering Ethics Education in American

  • 摘要: 重视培养工科生的伦理责任意识是美国工程教育在20世纪末发生的显著变化之一。随着越来越多的美国高校开设工程伦理课程,如何评价工程伦理教育效果就成为美国工程教育界关注的一个话题。在简要分析美国工程伦理教育目标的基础上,对3个具有代表性的工程伦理教育评价工具和研究方法进行了详细阐述,指出美国工程伦理教育评价具有重视评价学生伦理推理能力、综合运用定量和定性评价方法、重视评价主体和评价环境的多元性等特点,并对中国工程教育中如何开展工科生"软素质"教育和评价工作提出了建议。
    Abstract: The growing recognition of the importance of engineering student-s ethic responsibility was one of the notable changes in engineering education in the USA. With increasingly American university setting up course related to engineering ethics, how to assess it effects becoming the focus of engineering educator. Based on analyzing the objective of engineering education, this article presents the current evaluation tool and method being used in engineering ethics education, elaborates three typical evaluation tools and methods and points out the five characteristics in assessment of engineering ethics education, such as much attentions are paid to student-s ethical reasoning ability, combination of qualitative and quantitative method and so on. In the end, the paper puts forward some suggestions about how to carry out ethic education and how to evaluate engineering student-s "soft" ability in China university.
  • [1] Herkert J R. Engineering ethics education in the USA: content, pedagogy and curriculum [J].European Journal of Engineering Education, 2005(4):303.
    [2] Lynch W. Teaching engineering ethics in the United States[J]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 1996(4): 27-36.
    [3] Lynch W, Kline R. Engineering practice and engineering ethics[J]. Technology and Human Values, 1997(25): 195-225.
    [4] Larry J Shuman, Mark F Sindelar. Can our students recognize and esolve ethical dilemmas . (2010-09-15).
    [5] Hastings Center. The teaching of ethics in higher education[M]. New York: Hastings Center/Hastingson-Hudson, 1980: 105.
    [6] Davis M. Introduction to a symposium: integrating ethics into engineering and science courses [J].Science and Engineering Ethics, 2005(11): 633.
    [7] Charles Harris, Michael Davis, Michael S Pritchard, et al. Engineering ethics: what? why? how? and when?[J].Journal of Engineering Education, 1996(2): 93-96.
    [8] Byron Newberry. The dilemma of ethics in engineering education[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2004(10): 344.
    [9] Pfatteicher. Teaching vs preaching: Ec2000 and the engineering ethics dilemma[J].Journal of Engineering Education, 2001(3):139.
    [10] Golnaz Hashemian, Michael C Loui. Can instruction in engineering ethics change students' feeling about professional responsibility[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2010(16): 206-210.
    [11] Nicholas H Steneck. Designing teaching and assessment tools for an integrated engineering ethics curriculum . San Juan: 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999.
    [12] 段瑞钰,李伯聪,汪应洛. 工程哲学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007:110.
    [13] James Weber. Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: a review, assessment, and recommendations[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1990(9) :187.
    [14] Larry J Shuman, Marry Besterfield Scave, Jack McGourty. The ABET "Professional Skills"-can they be taught? can they be assessed? [J].Journal of Engineering Education, 2005(3):46.
    [15] 唐丽. 美国工程伦理研究[M]. 沈阳:东北大学出版社,2007:5.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1505
  • HTML全文浏览量:  38
  • PDF下载量:  1980
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-10-17
  • 发布日期:  2011-11-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回