ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

中国药品安全事故的致因因素比较分析

蒋美英, 张鹤达

蒋美英, 张鹤达. 中国药品安全事故的致因因素比较分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(1): 19-23.
引用本文: 蒋美英, 张鹤达. 中国药品安全事故的致因因素比较分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2012, 25(1): 19-23.
Jiang Meiying, Zhang Heda. Comparative Analysis of China's Drug Accident Element[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(1): 19-23.
Citation: Jiang Meiying, Zhang Heda. Comparative Analysis of China's Drug Accident Element[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2012, 25(1): 19-23.

中国药品安全事故的致因因素比较分析

详细信息
    作者简介:

    蒋美英(1977— ),女,山东临沂人,讲师,硕士,研究方向为公共安全管理.

  • 中图分类号: D63; R954

Comparative Analysis of China's Drug Accident Element

  • 摘要: 药品事故频发引起社会的高度关注。基于中国国情,提取药品事故致因因素的主要方面,通过建立基于梯形模糊数的广义模糊群决策模型来分析中国药品事故严重性的致因因素排序。研究表明:同地区不同类型的受访者权重对药品事故严重性的致因因素排序有影响,但是地区差异对其影响占主要作用,最终显示中国药品事故严重性的致因因素排序为可追溯体系、交易方式、抽验制度、药物警戒、认证体系和应急管理。
    Abstract: The high incidence of drug accident causes great attentions in community. Based on China's national conditions, extracts the main aspects of drug accident types, and then builds a generalized empirical fuzzy group decision method based on trapezoidal fuzzy number to analyze the severity sort of China's drug accident types. The results indicate that the weights of different respondents in the same area affect the severity sort of drug accidents types, while the regional differences play a major role; then the final result indicates that the severity sort of China's drug accident types is traceability system, transaction mode, sampling system, pharmacovigilance, licensing system and emergence management.
  • [1] Grant I. UK to track US on drug traceability[J]. Infosecurity Today, 2006, 3(5):6-8.
    [2] Dong H, Bogg L, Rehnberg C, et al. Drug policy in China: pharmaceutical distribution in rural areas[J]. Social Science and Medicine, 1999, 48: 777-786.
    [3] Harlanda C, Walkera H. A strategic case for e-adoption in healthcare supply chains[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2006, 26: 290-301.
    [4] McEwen J. Risk management from an Asian/Pacific rim regulatory perspective[J]. Drug Safety, 2004, 27(8).
    [5] Abraham J. Transnational industrial power, the medical profession and the regulatory state: adverse drug reactions and the crisis over the safety of Halcion in the Netherlands and the UK[J]. Social Science and Medicine, 2002, 55: 1671-1690.
    [6] Starbird S A, Amanor Boadu V. Do inspection and traceability provide incentives for food safety?[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2006:31(1): 14-26.
    [7] Almenoff J S. Innovations for the future of pharmacovigilance[J]. Drug Safety, 2007, 30(7): 631-633.
    [8] Wilson J, Oyola Yemaiel A. The evolution of emergency management and the advancement towards a profession in the United States and Florida[J]. Safety Science, 2001, 39: 117-131.
    [9] Shen Chun Ying, Yu Kun Tzu. A generalized fuzzy approach for strategic problems: the empirical study on facility location selection of authors' management consultation client as an example[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 4709-4716.
    [10] Pan N F. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method[J]. Automation in Construction, 2008, 17: 958-965.
    [11] Cheng Ching Hsue, Lin Yin. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142: 174-186.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  987
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  868
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-04-19
  • 发布日期:  2012-01-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回