Study of Airline Antitrust Merger
-
摘要: 近些年航空公司的合并行为愈加频繁,航空公司的合并行为是否应受到《反垄断法》的规制,需要综合其合并效果及其是否可以获得豁免等来决定,文章中将中国《反垄断法》对航空公司合并这一行为的效果评价标准、豁免制度及域外适用的具体规定与欧美发达国家或地区的航空公司合并的法律规定进行比较研究,阐述中国对航空公司合并法律规定存在操作性不强、对相关市场和公共利益界定不明确的缺陷,提出了完善航空公司合并涉及的相关市场界定和关于航空公司合并的豁免制度。Abstract: Behavior of airline mergers in recent years become more frequent, whether the airline's merger behavior should be regulated by Untitrust Law or not, it decides by the combined effect and if it can be exempted, this article make a comparative study of china Antitrust Law and the American and European countries or regions' law on airline mergers about this act's effect of evaluation criteria, the exemption system and the extraterritorial application of specific provisions. It expounds China law has some defects that is not strong operational presence on airline mergers and dose not have a clearly defined on the relevant market and public interest, proposed a corresponding improvement of airline mergers involving the definition of the relevant market and airline mergers and exemption system.
-
Keywords:
- airline /
- combined behavior /
- business concentration /
- Antitrust Laws
-
-
[1] 漆多俊.反垄断法理论与实践探索[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1998:80-81. [2] 章丹雯.反垄断法对企业合并规制的比较研究[J].中国商界,2009(6):272. [3] 戴旭,张洋.工业化过程中的竞争与垄断[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994:107-108. [4] 曹士兵.反垄断法研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1998:197. [5] 中国民用航空局政策法规司,航空安全技术中心.航空运输业反垄断典型案例解析[M]. 北京:中国民航出版社,2008:138. [6] 程吉生.国外企业合并控制反垄断法发展趋势的分析[J].现代法学,2000(1):139. [7] 黄挽澜. 外资并购反垄断问题研究载于经济法前沿问题研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008:239. [8] 姜发根. 反垄断法域外适用制度初探[J]. 菏泽学院学报,2006(4):89. [9] 缪剑文. 从波音麦道兼并案看欧盟竞争法的域外效力[J]. 法制与经济,1997(6):25-26. [10] 许敏智. 企业合并的反垄断法规制[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2010(4):74-77.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1197
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 1210