ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

突发事件与制度变迁、技术进步关系研究

李明

李明. 突发事件与制度变迁、技术进步关系研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(1): 16-23,89.
引用本文: 李明. 突发事件与制度变迁、技术进步关系研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(1): 16-23,89.
Li Ming. The Dynamics of Institutional Change and Technical Progress: View from Emergency Event[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 16-23,89.
Citation: Li Ming. The Dynamics of Institutional Change and Technical Progress: View from Emergency Event[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 16-23,89.

突发事件与制度变迁、技术进步关系研究

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李明(1968—),男,河北沧州人,副教授,博士研究生,研究方向为风险治理、公共政策、公共管理、应急管理.

  • 中图分类号: D35

The Dynamics of Institutional Change and Technical Progress: View from Emergency Event

  • 摘要: 现代社会科学的研究对象具有连续性、线性发展特征,这是现代定量研究的基础。现代社会科学普遍缺乏对于非连续、非线性的突发事件的研究,但突发事件对社会发展意义重大。突发事件打破路径依赖,使制度变迁和技术进步障碍消除,机会之窗打开。突发事件可以暴露系统存在的缺陷,是制度变迁、技术进步的动力,也决定了变迁方向、地点和时机。在公共政策制定与公共管理中,应用突发事件相关的脆弱性、混沌、制度变迁理论,可以探讨如何有效推动制度和技术进步。
    Abstract: The object of modern social science has features of continuity and linearity. But there are few research on sudden event, but they are dynamics of social development. Both the path dependence or obstacle of development will be broken by a sudden event, and the opportunity windows will be opened. Failure in system will be exposed by sudden event, which will guide the direction of institutional change and technical progress. In public policy and public management the applying of vulnerability, chaos and event-institution change theory will be useful to push institution and technical progress.
  • [1] 汪丁丁. 中国社会进入高风险时期?[J]. 中国改革,1999(5):29.
    [2] 刘汉民. 路径依赖理论研究综述[J].经济学动态,2003(6):65—69.
    [3] David Paul A. Why are institutions the carriers of history: path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,1994,5(2).
    [4] Arthur W Brian. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy[M]. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press, 1994:49—53.
    [5] 周业安. 政治过程中的路径依赖[J].学术月刊,2007(8):71—74.
    [6] Grabher G. The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the ruhr area[M]//Gernot Grabher. The Embedded Firm-on the Socia-Economics of Industrial Networks. London: Routledge, 1993:255—277.
    [7] Justin, Lin Yifu. An economic theory of institutional change: induced and imposed change [J]. Cato Journal,1989, 9(1):1—33.
    [8] Paul Pierson. Increasing return, path dependence and the study of politics[J].American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(2):251—267.
    [9] 汤因比. 历史研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1986:33—47.
    [10] 夏明方. 自然灾害、环境危机与中国现代化研究的新视野[J].历史理论研究,2003(4):5—9.
    [11] Musgrave R A. Schumpeter-s crisis of the tax state: an essay in fiscal sociology[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1992(2): 89—113.
    [12] James O Connor. The fiscal crisis of the state[M]. New York:St Martin-s Press,1973:46—60.
    [13] 张宇燕,何帆. 由财政压力引起的制度变迁[M]//盛洪,张宇燕.从计划经济到市场经济.北京:北京大学出版社,1998:69—70.
    [14] Lindblom, 邹建锋, 王东. 渐进调试的科学[J]. 中共天津市委党校学报,2011(2):72—78.
    [15] North Douglass. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990:92—106.
    [16] Braybrooke,Lindblom. A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. [M]. New York: Free Press of Glencoe,1963: 93—102.
    [17] Arthur W Brian,Thomas J Espenshade. Immigration policy and immigrants'age[J]. Population and Development Review,1988,14(2):315—331.
    [18] Baumgartner, Jones. Agendas and instability in American politics [M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1993: 132—148.
    [19] Lowenstein G, Elster J. Choice over time[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1990: 287—330.
    [20] Jones, Bryan D. Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: attention, choice, and public policy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994:92—120.
    [22] Stan J Liebowitz, Stephen E Margolis. Path dependence, lock-in and history[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1995,11(1):205—226.
    [23] 彭文平.制度变迁理论的新动向[J].经济学动态,2000(7):57—60.
    [24] Thomas A Birkland. After disaster: agenda setting, public policy and focusing events[M]. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1997:24—53.
    [25] 宁军明.路径依赖、路径创造与中国的经济体制转轨[J].学术月刊,2006(4):86—90.
    [26] 张伟. 打开政策之窗[N]学习时报,2006-09-11(06).
    [27] 约翰·W·金登. 议程、备选方案与公共政策[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2004:52.
    [28] 拉雷·N·格斯顿. 公共政策的制定——程序和原理[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2001:23,25.
    [29] Stilwell J. Managing Chaos[J]. Public Management, 1996,78 (9):6—9.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1001
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  577
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-12-13
  • 发布日期:  2013-01-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回