ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

规制俘获理论研究评述

李健

李健. 规制俘获理论研究评述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(1): 77-82.
引用本文: 李健. 规制俘获理论研究评述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(1): 77-82.
Li Jian. Review of Regulatory Capture Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 77-82.
Citation: Li Jian. Review of Regulatory Capture Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(1): 77-82.

规制俘获理论研究评述

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李健(1981—),男,辽宁盘锦人,讲师,博士,研究方向为规制经济学.

  • 中图分类号: F091.3

Review of Regulatory Capture Theory

  • 摘要: 在近年来规制俘获理论发展的主要特点的基础上,指出随着规制环境的变化,规制俘获研究开始呈现跨学科趋势,在管理学、法学、政治学、社会学与经济学之间规制俘获理论交叉、融合,发展出企业政治战略理论、规制的法律与经济分析、特殊利益政治学、规制社会资本理论等新的研究内容和领域。通过介绍这些领域的理论基础、研究范式和最新进展,指出跨学科研究丰富和完善了规制俘获理论,并最终使其向综合的科学理论方向发展。
    Abstract: The main characteristics of the development of regulatory capture in recent years are discussed here. It is pointed out that the study on regulatory capture is a kind of interdisciplinary research, and then is a new energetic field developed by crossing and syncretizing the regulatory capture with many related disciplines such as management, law, political science and sociology; in which the connotations, developments and trends of company political strategy, regulation legal form and economic theory, special interest groups, social capital of regulation are expatiated. It is indicated that the refinements of these disciplines imply the profound understanding of the human being on the regulatory capture. The interdiscipline will definitely follow the principles of the integrity and ultimately develop toward the establishment of the comprehensive theories for the regulatory capture.
  • [1] Amy J Hillman, Michael A Hitt. Corporate political strategy formulation: a model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4): 825—842.
    [2] Khwaja A, Mian A. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120(4):1371—1411.
    [3] Faccio M, Masulis R W, McConnell J J. Political conections and corporate baiouts[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(6):2597—2635.
    [4] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Politicians and firms[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109(4):995—1025.
    [5] Cooper M J, Gulen H, Ovtchinnikov A V. Corporate political contributions and stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(2):687—724.
    [6] Aggarwal R K, Meschke F, Wang T. Corporate political contributions: investment or agency?[C]//The 5th WFA Meeting. Las Vegas: College of Business, 2011: 1—34.
    [7] Boubakri N, Cosset J C, Saffar W. Political connection of newly privatized firms[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008, 14(5):654—673.
    [8] 西耶斯. 论特权第三等级是什么?[M]. 冯棠,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1990: 1—2.
    [9] Cheung S U A. Theory of price control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1974,17(1):53—71.
    [10] 丹尼尔·F·史普博. 管制与市场[M]. 余晖,何帆,钱家骏,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,1999: 388.
    [11] Neuberger Edon, Dufly Wiliam. Comparative economic systems: a design making approach[M]. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1976:128—145.
    [12] 爱德华·格莱泽,西蒙·约翰逊,安德烈·施莱弗. 科斯对科斯定理——波兰与捷克证券市场规制的比较[G]//孙宽平. 转轨、规制与制度选择. 北京:社会科学出版社,2004:233—294.
    [13] 小贾尔斯·伯吉斯. 管制和反垄断经济学[M]. 冯金华,译. 上海: 上海财经大学出版社,2003:112—116.
    [14] 安东尼·奥格斯. 规制的法律形式与经济分析[M]. 骆梅英,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:243—248.
    [15] 唐要家. 试析政府管制的行政过程与控制机制[J]. 天津社会科学,2008(11):75—80.
    [16] 唐要家. 反垄断与政府管制理论与政策研究新进展——"反垄断与政府管制:理论与政策"国际研讨会观点综述[J]. 中国工业经济,2009(1):147—154.
    [17] Schlozman K L, Tierney J T. Organized interests and american democracy[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1986: 456—478.
    [18] Ken Kollman. Outside lobbying: public opinion and interest group strategies[M].New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998: 323—329.
    [19] Gene M Grossman, Elhanan Helpman. Special interest politics[M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001: 14—16.
    [20] Anderear Dur. Measuring interest group influence in the EU[J]. European Union Politics, 2008, 19(4): 559—576.
    [21] Slapin Jonathan B, Sven Oliver Proksch. A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 2008, 52(3): 705—722.
    [22] Heike Kluve. Measuring interest group influence using quantitative text analysis[J]. European Union Politics, 2009, 10(4): 535—549.
    [23] 马克·格兰诺维特. 镶嵌:社会网与经济行动[M]. 罗家德, 译. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007:3—10.
    [24] Mark Granovetter. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78 (6):1360—1380.
    [25] Xin K R, Pearce J L. Guanxi: connections as substitutes for formal institutional support[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(6): 1614—1658.
    [26] Bian Y. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China[J]. American Sociological Review, 1997, 62(3): 366—383.
    [27] Ronald Burt. Structural holes: the social structure of competition[M].Chicago: Harvard University Press, 1995:18—30.
    [28] 姚小涛,张田,席酉民. 强关系与弱关系:企业成长的社会关系依赖研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2008(1):143—152.
    [29] 张闯. 社会网络视角下的渠道权力结构与策略研究[M]. 大连: 东北财经大学出版社,2008.
    [30] 罗纳德·伯特. 结构洞——竞争的社会结构[M]. 任敏,李璐,林虹,译. 上海: 上海人民出版社,2008:3—12.
    [31] 理查德·斯图尔特. 美国行政法的重构[M]. 沈岿,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2002:24—26.
    [32] 边燕杰,丘海雄. 企业的社会资本及其功效[J]. 中国社会科学,2000(2):87—99.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  883
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  586
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-07-07
  • 发布日期:  2013-01-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回