"Reengineering" or "Return to Education": Comment on U S Engineering Education Reform
-
摘要: 近20年来发生在美国工程教育领域的一系列改革,被世界公认是最成功的,各国工程教育界纷纷效仿,但结果都不理想。在分析美国工程教育改革现状的基础上,深入探讨其成功背后蕴藏的问题和危机,明确指出中国与美国工程教育的对象和状况迥异,因此中国的工程教育改革不能一味效仿美国,而是应该抓住"回归教育"潮流的大好机遇,深入研究工程教育的本质问题,开辟一条有中国特色的工程教育之路。Abstract: In the past two decades, a series of reforms in the field of engineering education in the U.S. has been recognized worldwide as the most successful. Peers in other countries have emulated its successful experience one after another, but the results are not satisfactory. This paper analyzes the problems and crises behind its "success", based on the status of the U.S. engineering education reform, and clearly points out the causes why we can not emulate it. As in the following, China can explore its own unique set of engineering education road.
-
-
[1] 王子先.如何认识十七大指出的我国新时期经济国际化趋势之二:当前我国经济国际化水平的评估[EB/OL].(2008-01-08)[2011-05-02]. [2] 教育部考试中心海外考试报名信息网.麻省理工学院的学生科研项目UROP和IROP[EB/OL].(2010-11-11)[2011-05-02]. [3] 瞿福平.通往成功:MIT工学院本科实践机会计划[J].高等工程教育研究,2005(1):84. [4] 陶永芳.CDIO大纲对高等工科教育创新的启示[J].中国高教研究,2006(11):81. [5] Gordon MIT engineering leadership program: building engineering leaders[EB/OL]. [2011-05-02]. [6] 国家教委工程教育考察团. 回归工程·多样化·宏观管理[J]. 高等工程教育研究,1996(1). [7] 徐明明,季忠玉,翁元垣."回归工程"观与"素质教育"观[J].化工高等教育,1997(3):56—58. [8] Li Qing,McCoach D Betsy, Swaminathan Hariharan. Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students[J].Journal of Engineering Education, 2008(1):47—56. [9] Maura Borrego. Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: a study of the publication patterns of four coalitions[J].Journal of Engineering Education,2007(1):5—18. [10] Diane Rover T. Engineering identity[J].Journal of Engineering Education, 2008(7):389—392. [11] Haghighi,Smith K, Olds K A, et al. The time is now: are we ready for our role[J]. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008(4):119—121. [12] 王沛民,孔寒冰. 我国高等工程教育需要整体反思[J]. 中国高等教育, 2001(5):28—30.
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: