高级搜索
ISSN 1008-2204
CN 11-3979/C

政府公共危机管理比较研究——以卡特里娜和桑迪飓风为例

袁国栋

袁国栋. 政府公共危机管理比较研究——以卡特里娜和桑迪飓风为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(2): 19-23,32.
引用本文: 袁国栋. 政府公共危机管理比较研究——以卡特里娜和桑迪飓风为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2013, 26(2): 19-23,32.
shu
Yuan Guodong. Public Crisis Management Analysis: Based on Comparison between Hurricane Katrina and Sandy[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(2): 19-23,32.
Citation: Yuan Guodong. Public Crisis Management Analysis: Based on Comparison between Hurricane Katrina and Sandy[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2013, 26(2): 19-23,32.
shu

政府公共危机管理比较研究——以卡特里娜和桑迪飓风为例

  • 北京大学 政府管理学院, 北京 100871

详细信息
    作者简介:

    袁国栋(1987-),男,河南商丘人,硕士研究生,研究方向为公共危机管理.

  • 中图分类号: D63

Public Crisis Management Analysis: Based on Comparison between Hurricane Katrina and Sandy

  • School of Government, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 近年来,公共危机发生呈常态化趋势,相应的政府公共危机管理能力也成为评价政府能力的重要指标。通过对比卡特里娜和桑迪飓风发生时美国政府不同的表现,特别从灾前应急准备、府际间合作协调机制、社会心理调控机制三个方面剖析应对的策略,认为美国政府在应对桑迪飓风时在这三个方面都有改进并取得了不错的结果。提出其对中国政府危机管理的两点启示,即建立常设的全国性应急管理体系和利用新媒体建立完善的社会心理调控机制。
    Abstract: Recently, along with the tendency of normalization in occurrence of public crisis,the capability of government managing crisis has become one of important evaluation indicators. This article reviews the different strategies, especially from the aspects of emergency preparedness before disasters,intergovernmental and cross'agencies cooperation mechanism and social psychological regulation mechanism, adopted by U.S. government between hurricane Katrina and Sandy to draw a conclusion that U.S. government improved all three aspects and obtained better results of coping with hurricane Sandy. Finally, this essay points out two revelations to public crisis management in China,which are building normalized national emergency management system and constructing perfect social psychological regulation mechanism with the help of new media.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(26)
  • [1] 乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 上海: 译林出版社, 2003:15.
    [2] Knabb R D, Rhome J R, Brown D P. Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina (23～30 August 2005) [R].Miami: National Hurricane Center, 2006.
    [3] Baker K. The future of new orleans.[J]. American Heritage, 2006, 57(2): 23-25.
    [4] Collins S, Lieberman J. Hurricane Katrina: a nation still unprepared [R].Washington D C: U S Senate Committee on Homeland Security Affairs, 2006.
    [5] 赵德余. 权利、危机与公共政策:一个比较政治的视角[M]. 上海: 三联书店, 2012.
    [6] 国家发展改革委外事司. 美国应急反应体系在卡特里娜飓风中暴露出的问题及启示[J]. 中国经贸导刊, 2005(19): 47-48.
    [7] Ink D. An analysis of the house select committee and white house reports on Hurricane Katrina[J]. Public Administration Review,2006, 66(6).
    [8] 孙春霞,蓝志勇. 新奥尔良飓风灾难应对失当的成因剖析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2008(2): 51-54.
    [9] Tollefson J. Hurricane Sandy spins up climate discussion [J/OL]. Nature, (2012-10-30).
    [10] Samenow J. Cause for concern: the 7 most alarming Hurricane Sandy images [N/OL]. Washington Post,(2012-10-28). 2012/10/28/615bbbfe-210b-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html.
    [11] Pratt M, Rubinkam M, Matthews K. Eastern utilities brace for expected super storm [N/OL]. Washington Post,(2012-10-25).
    [12] 杨丽明. 飓风"桑迪"为美国大选增添变数 [N/OL]. 中国青年报,(2012-10-31).
    [13] Greenhill J. National guard aids in Hurricane Sandy response [EB/OL].National Guard Bureau,(2012-10-30).
    [14] DOD provides Hurricane Sandy response update [EB/OL].American Forces Press Service,(2012-10-30).
    [15] National Response Framework [EB/OL].U S Department of Homeland Security, (2012-03-06).
    [16] Anderson L. Closely monitoring Hurricane Sandy [EB/OL].FEMA,(2012-10-25).
    [17] FEMA and federal partners continue to support areas affected by the aftermath of Sandy [EB/OL]. FEMA News Desk,(2012-10-30).
    [18] Zezima K, Mcclam E. Superstorm Sandy causes flooding in New York City [EB/OL]. Associated Press,(2012-10-29).
    [19] Dewey C. Hurricane Sandy’s social media clean-up efforts help New York [N/OL]. Washington Post,(2012-11-20).
    [20] Hurricane Sandy: rumor control [EB/OL]. FEMA,(2012-11-03).
    [21] 李学梅. 飓风后的思考:城市该如何应对灾难 [N/OL]. 新华社, (2012-11-01).
    [22] Factbox: Storm Sandy blamed for at least 132 deaths in US, Canada [EB/OL]. Reuters,(2012-11-16).
    [23] Plumer B. Is Sandy the second-most destructive U S hurricane ever? Or not even top 10? [N/OL]. Washington Post,(2012-11-05).
    [24] 山东大学经济研究中心"Sars防治成本研究"课题组. SARS防治无效成本的制度经济学反思[J]. 山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2004(5): 69-74.
    [25] 闪淳昌,周玲. 从SARS到大雪灾:中国应急管理体系建设的发展脉络及经验反思[J]. 甘肃社会科学,2008(5): 40-44.
    [26] 李彦冰. 重大危机事件中我国政府形象传播存在的问题[J]. 声屏世界, 2009(1): 19-20.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  845
  • HTML全文浏览量:  26
  • PDF下载量:  1283
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-12-16
  • 发布日期:  2013-03-24

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(26)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》编辑部
    电话: 010-82338013E-mail: bhskxb@buaa.edu.cn邮编：100083

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发  百度统计